Everything Hertz
Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin)

Tämä podcast on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi podcastin jaksot saattavat sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(195)

99: Science advocacy

99: Science advocacy

Dan and James answer a listener question on science advocacy. Is this an activity that all scientists should do, and if so, how much advocacy work should we be doing? Here's other stuff they cover a...

6 Tammi 202049min

98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)

98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)

We chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research. Here's what we...

16 Joulu 201959min

97: Slow science

97: Slow science

Dan and James discuss the concept of "slow science", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment. Here's what they co...

2 Joulu 20191h

96: The chaotic state of doctoral research

96: The chaotic state of doctoral research

Dan and James discuss the results of this year's Nature survey of PhD students. Despite a majority of students reporting general satisfaction with their decision to undertake a PhD, many described a s...

18 Marras 201947min

95: All good presentations are alike; each bad presentation is bad in its own way

95: All good presentations are alike; each bad presentation is bad in its own way

Dan and James discuss why academia tolerates bad presentations and the strange distrust of polished presentations. Here's what else they discuss... James had a Filipino feast https://twitter.com/j...

4 Marras 20191h 3min

94: Predicting the replicability of research

94: Predicting the replicability of research

Dan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the repliCATS project, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. Th...

21 Loka 201958min

93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science

93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science

Dan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews. Stuff they cover: How common is ...

7 Loka 201954min

92: Chaos in the brickyard

92: Chaos in the brickyard

Dan and James discuss the role of Google Scholar in citation patterns and whether we should limit academics to only publishing two papers a year. Links and details: James has a new Hertz-quarters T...

16 Syys 20191h 13min

Suosittua kategoriassa Tiede

rss-poliisin-mieli
rss-mita-tulisi-tietaa
tiedekulma-podcast
rss-tiedetta-vai-tarinaa
docemilia
rss-duodecim-lehti
rss-bios-podcast
rss-lapsuuden-rakentajat-podcast
rss-hereilla
hippokrateen-vastaanotolla
filocast-filosofian-perusteet
radio-antro
utelias-mieli