A Comparison of the Early Writings of Nietzsche and Kierkegaard - Part 4 (last part)
This is the fourth and last in a series of four short lectures that describe the similarities and differences between the early work of the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard and the German philosop...
23 Maalis 202227min
A Comparison of the Early Writings of Nietzsche and Kierkegaard - Part 3
This is the third in a series of four short lectures that describe the similarities and differences between the early work of the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard and the German philosopher Friedr...
23 Maalis 202226min
A Comparison of the Early Writings of Nietzsche and Kierkegaard - Part 2
This is the second in a series of four short lectures that describe the similarities and differences between the early work of the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard and the German philosopher Fried...
23 Maalis 202223min
A Comparison of the Early Writings of Nietzsche and Kierkegaard - Part 1
This is the first in a series of four short lectures that describe the similarities and differences between the early work of the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard and the German philosopher Friedr...
23 Maalis 202226min
Shai Dothan: International Judicial Review, The Conclusion.
The Conclusion describes briefly the contents of Chapter 7 of the book that is focused on contrasting the theories in the book with established theories of domestic judicial review and on presenting d...
24 Elo 20216min
Shai Dothan: International Judicial Review, Chapter 6.
Chapter 6 faces the final challenge to international courts' intervention, the fear that their intervention would lead to bad outcomes because it would change the incentives of relevant parties. It is...
24 Elo 20215min
Shai Dothan: International Judicial Review, Chapter 5.
Chapter 5 is focused on the risk of capture of international courts by NGOs. The chapter reviews the advantages and disadvantages of NGO involvement in international courts' proceedings either as dire...
24 Elo 20219min
Shai Dothan: International Judicial Review, Chapter 4.
Chapter 4 replies to the argument that international courts who decide important policy decisions take them off the public agenda and therefore stifle public debate. The chapter explains that an inter...
23 Elo 202110min
