Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 3) (1/23/26)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 3) (1/23/26)

In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal ...

23 Jan 12min

Power Protects Power: Nancy Pelosi’s Backroom Rebuke Over the Epstein Subpoenas (1/23/26)

Power Protects Power: Nancy Pelosi’s Backroom Rebuke Over the Epstein Subpoenas (1/23/26)

Nancy Pelosi’s reaction to her own party voting to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt was less about principle and more about protecting power. Instead of defending the authority of Congress or...

23 Jan 23min

The New York Post Editorial vs. Reality: My Takedown of Their Latest Epstein Narrative (1/23/26)

The New York Post Editorial vs. Reality: My Takedown of Their Latest Epstein Narrative (1/23/26)

The Post editorial is not an argument, it is a tantrum disguised as analysis, built almost entirely out of contempt for the reader rather than engagement with the facts. Instead of explaining why the ...

23 Jan 19min

The Hypocrisy of Anna Paulina Luna in the Epstein Transparency Fight (1/23/26)

The Hypocrisy of Anna Paulina Luna in the Epstein Transparency Fight (1/23/26)

Representative Anna Paulina Luna publicly accused Judge Paul Engelmayer of obstructing transparency in the Epstein files by denying requests for a special master and refusing to intervene in what she ...

23 Jan 11min

Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And  His  Pal Alan Dershowitz (1/23/26)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Pal Alan Dershowitz (1/23/26)

Alan Dershowitz’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has drawn sustained criticism because it went far beyond a routine attorney-client connection and placed one of the country’s most famous legal scho...

23 Jan 41min

Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 3-5) (1/23/26)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 3-5) (1/23/26)

In July 2019, following his arrest on federal sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, Jeffrey Epstein was formally ordered remanded to custody after a detention hearing before Judge Richard Berman. Pr...

23 Jan 45min

Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 1-2) (1/22/26)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 1-2) (1/22/26)

In July 2019, following his arrest on federal sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, Jeffrey Epstein was formally ordered remanded to custody after a detention hearing before Judge Richard Berman. Pr...

23 Jan 27min

Jeffrey Epstein,  Ghislaine Maxwell  And The Sexual Ponzi Scheme They Managed

Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell And The Sexual Ponzi Scheme They Managed

Epstein’s operation has been explained as a sexual Ponzi scheme because it relied on the same core mechanics as a financial fraud: constant recruitment, layered incentives, and silence bought through ...

23 Jan 14min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden-usa
aftenpodden
stopp-verden
forklart
i-retten
popradet
det-store-bildet
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-gukild-johaug
bt-dokumentar-2
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
rss-dannet-uten-piano
e24-podden