Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

Subpoena Dodging 101: The Clintons’ Epstein Playbook  (12/16/25)

Subpoena Dodging 101: The Clintons’ Epstein Playbook (12/16/25)

For the past few months, the Clintons have responded to congressional subpoenas tied to Jeffrey Epstein with a posture that suggests calculation, not cooperation. Instead of promptly appearing to answ...

16 Des 202513min

The Epstein Survivors Lawsuit Against Bank Of America And BNY Mellon Has It's First Hearing (12/16/25)

The Epstein Survivors Lawsuit Against Bank Of America And BNY Mellon Has It's First Hearing (12/16/25)

The lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against Bank of America and BNY Mellon has gotten off to a procedurally rocky but far from fatal start, after Judge Jed Rakoff expressed skepticism about...

16 Des 202518min

Paperwork Over Predators: How New York Tried to Soften Jeffrey Epstein’s Crimes (12/16/25)

Paperwork Over Predators: How New York Tried to Soften Jeffrey Epstein’s Crimes (12/16/25)

New York prosecutors once advanced an argument that bordered on the surreal: that Jeffrey Epstein’s status as a sex offender should be downgraded because his conduct, they claimed, did not fit the mos...

16 Des 202517min

Mega Edition:  How DOJ Buried the Truth About Jeffrey Epstein's Sweetheart Deal (12/16/25)

Mega Edition: How DOJ Buried the Truth About Jeffrey Epstein's Sweetheart Deal (12/16/25)

The official story has always painted Alex Acosta as the man solely responsible for Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, but that version is designed to mislead. Acosta was a mid-level figure,...

16 Des 202522min

Mega Edition:  The Epstein Congressional Hearings:  A True Pursuit Of Justice Or Just Optics? (12/16/25)

Mega Edition: The Epstein Congressional Hearings: A True Pursuit Of Justice Or Just Optics? (12/16/25)

The congressional hearings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein are less about justice and more about optics. Behind the staged outrage, secret depositions, and selective leaks lies a carefully managed narrati...

16 Des 202527min

Mega Edition:  Peter Thiel, Ehud Barak, and the Billionaire Spy Circle  (12/15/25)

Mega Edition: Peter Thiel, Ehud Barak, and the Billionaire Spy Circle (12/15/25)

In the final years of his life, Jeffrey Epstein attempted to reinvent himself as a player in the surveillance and security-tech industry. Newly leaked emails from Ehud Barak’s inbox show Epstein’s int...

16 Des 202527min

Judge Hafele And The Wall He  Imposed When It Comes To Florida Epstein Grand Jury Files

Judge Hafele And The Wall He Imposed When It Comes To Florida Epstein Grand Jury Files

Circuit Judge Donald W. Hafele was the trial-level judge in Palm Beach County who repeatedly denied efforts to unseal the secret grand jury transcripts from the 2006 grand jury that investigated Jeffr...

16 Des 202514min

How Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes Were Purposefully Mischaracterized In 2008

How Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes Were Purposefully Mischaracterized In 2008

The 2008 case against Jeffrey Epstein is often mischaracterized in the public memory as a simple “solicitation” or “prostitution” case, as if Epstein were caught in some run-of-the-mill vice crime. Th...

16 Des 202514min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
i-retten
stopp-verden
forklart
aftenpodden-usa
popradet
det-store-bildet
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
fotballpodden-2
rss-gukild-johaug
rss-ness
rss-dannet-uten-piano
frokostshowet-pa-p5
bt-dokumentar-2
grasoner-den-nye-kalde-krigen
e24-podden