Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And It's Alleged Transparency Problems

Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And It's Alleged Transparency Problems

Shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s death in August 2019, he signed a will on August 9 bequeathing his estimated $577 million fortune into a trust known as the “1953 Trust.” Critics quickly raised concern...

9 Des 202515min

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Tantrum That Never Ends

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Tantrum That Never Ends

Ghislaine Maxwell has attempted to cast her hair loss as yet another injury inflicted by incarceration, blaming the physical effects of prison while serving a sentence for facilitating the sexual abus...

8 Des 202526min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Des 202513min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Des 202512min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Des 202513min

Bruce Reinhart and the Prosecutors Who Crossed to Epstein’s Side (12/8/25)

Bruce Reinhart and the Prosecutors Who Crossed to Epstein’s Side (12/8/25)

The first Epstein prosecution in Florida was compromised not just by what happened in court, but by what happened afterward, when multiple federal prosecutors left the Southern District of Florida and...

8 Des 202516min

Purity Test Politics: Epstein Files and Marjorie Taylor Greene’s MAGA Fallout (12/8/25)

Purity Test Politics: Epstein Files and Marjorie Taylor Greene’s MAGA Fallout (12/8/25)

The ongoing fight over the Epstein files has exposed a widening fracture inside the MAGA movement, turning what was once a unifying rallying cry about corruption and elite criminality into a loyalty t...

8 Des 202511min

Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Birthday Book And The Blue Print For The So Called Elite (12/8/25)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein's Birthday Book And The Blue Print For The So Called Elite (12/8/25)

Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday book is far more than a grotesque artifact—it’s a rare glimpse into how the ruling class truly thinks when they believe no one is watching. The notes and jokes scrawled...

8 Des 202533min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
i-retten
stopp-verden
forklart
popradet
det-store-bildet
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
fotballpodden-2
rss-gukild-johaug
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
bt-dokumentar-2
frokostshowet-pa-p5
e24-podden
rss-dannet-uten-piano
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk