Dr. Peter Attia and the Epstein Files  (2/3/26)

Dr. Peter Attia and the Epstein Files (2/3/26)

The backlash against Dr. Peter Attia has been swift and unforgiving since newly released documents from the Jeffrey Epstein files revealed an extensive and friendly correspondence between the celebrity longevity doctor and the convicted sex offender — including over 1,700 mentions of Attia in the trove — complete with casual and crude exchanges that reflected an ongoing relationship well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Attia’s name popping up repeatedly in the federal materials has shocked many of his followers and critics alike, not least because he built his public brand on health, integrity, and longevity advice while quietly maintaining a social rapport with someone now widely understood as a deeply exploitative predator. One especially unsettling detail — emails joking about sex and lifestyle — has made even the most technical defense of his interactions ring hollow for critics who see this not as harmless professional contact but as an elitist embrace of a man whose abuses were known to the world.

The blowback hasn’t been abstract — it’s already cost Attia real-world roles and credibility. He resigned from his position as Chief Science Officer at David Protein and has been forced to apologize publicly, calling the emails “embarrassing, tasteless, and indefensible,” while CBS News reportedly weighs cutting ties with him as a contributor amid internal and public pressure to dissociate from his tarnished judgment. Many observers have labeled his apology as insufficiently contrite and criticized him for not addressing the deeper ethical implications of befriending a convicted child trafficker, arguing that his reputation as a trusted health authority is fundamentally shaken. Rather than confronting how his willingness to hobnob with Epstein reflects on his values and professional integrity, Attia’s defensive framing — insisting he wasn’t involved in criminal activity and emphasizing that he wouldn’t act that way “today” — has been seen by some as tone-deaf and self-protective, feeding into narratives about elites dodging accountability.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

Jeffrey Epstein And The Odd Visits He Received While In Jail

Jeffrey Epstein And The Odd Visits He Received While In Jail

While Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated in Florida following his 2008 state conviction, he maintained access to a stream of visitors that critics have long argued was wildly inappropriate given the nat...

9 Des 202528min

Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And It's Alleged Transparency Problems

Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And It's Alleged Transparency Problems

Shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s death in August 2019, he signed a will on August 9 bequeathing his estimated $577 million fortune into a trust known as the “1953 Trust.” Critics quickly raised concern...

9 Des 202515min

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Tantrum That Never Ends

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Tantrum That Never Ends

Ghislaine Maxwell has attempted to cast her hair loss as yet another injury inflicted by incarceration, blaming the physical effects of prison while serving a sentence for facilitating the sexual abus...

8 Des 202526min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Des 202513min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Des 202512min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Des 202513min

Bruce Reinhart and the Prosecutors Who Crossed to Epstein’s Side (12/8/25)

Bruce Reinhart and the Prosecutors Who Crossed to Epstein’s Side (12/8/25)

The first Epstein prosecution in Florida was compromised not just by what happened in court, but by what happened afterward, when multiple federal prosecutors left the Southern District of Florida and...

8 Des 202516min

Purity Test Politics: Epstein Files and Marjorie Taylor Greene’s MAGA Fallout (12/8/25)

Purity Test Politics: Epstein Files and Marjorie Taylor Greene’s MAGA Fallout (12/8/25)

The ongoing fight over the Epstein files has exposed a widening fracture inside the MAGA movement, turning what was once a unifying rallying cry about corruption and elite criminality into a loyalty t...

8 Des 202511min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
i-retten
forklart
stopp-verden
popradet
det-store-bildet
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
fotballpodden-2
rss-gukild-johaug
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
frokostshowet-pa-p5
e24-podden
rss-dannet-uten-piano
bt-dokumentar-2
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk