Prince Andrew Asks Judge Kaplan To Dismiss Virginia Robert's Lawsuit

Prince Andrew asked U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan to dismiss the civil lawsuit filed against him by Virginia Giuffre, arguing that the case was legally flawed and barred by prior agreements. His legal team contended that a 2009 settlement Giuffre reached with Jeffrey Epstein included broad release language that shielded other potential defendants — including Andrew — from future claims. They also argued that the complaint failed to state a viable claim under federal sex-trafficking laws, asserting that Andrew had no knowledge of Epstein’s alleged trafficking operation and that Giuffre’s allegations lacked sufficient specificity. Additionally, they challenged the court’s jurisdiction, claiming Andrew’s limited contacts with New York were insufficient to justify the case being heard there.

Judge Kaplan ultimately rejected Andrew’s motion, ruling that the language in the Epstein settlement agreement did not automatically immunize the prince at the dismissal stage and that Giuffre’s complaint plausibly alleged claims under the relevant statutes. Kaplan emphasized that factual disputes — including the meaning and scope of the 2009 release — could not be resolved on a motion to dismiss and would require further proceedings. The ruling allowed the lawsuit to move forward into discovery, increasing pressure on Andrew and leading to intense public scrutiny. Shortly thereafter, the case was resolved through an out-of-court settlement, with Andrew denying wrongdoing but agreeing to a financial settlement and a statement expressing regret for his association with Epstein.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(1000)

Mega Edition: Why Did The FBI Ignore Jeffrey Epstein's Criminal Empire? (5/5/26)

Federal Bureau of Investigation encountered multiple points over the years where information about Jeffrey Epstein could have supported earlier, more aggressive action, but those moments repeatedly fa...

5 Mai 49min

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Time Spent In The Custody Of State/Feds (5/4/26)

Jeffrey Epstein’s time in custody—both during his 2008 Florida case and his 2019 detention at the Metropolitan Correctional Center—was marked by a pattern of irregularities that set him apart from typ...

5 Mai 46min

The Epstein Bill Passes Both Chambers Of Congress

The Epstein Files bill blasted through Congress with numbers you almost never see anymore—427-1 in the House, and then it slid through the Senate with unanimous consent like it was greased. On paper, ...

5 Mai 17min

America’s Reckoning With the Epstein Files According To Brad Edwards

In his remarks, Edwards emphasized that the government has been withholding key documents that could shed light on Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. He explained that much of the evidence gathered—through law...

5 Mai 12min

Jeffrey Epstein, The Treasury Department And The Red Flags That Were Ignored

Suspicious Activity Reports, or SARs, are confidential filings that financial institutions are legally required to send to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) whene...

4 Mai 15min

Epstein’s Banking Empire: A Deeper, Darker Network Than Anyone Admitted

The Wall Street Journal has uncovered that Epstein maintained accounts with more than 20 banks even in the years leading up to his 2019 death—among them, Wells Fargo, TD Bank, and FirstBank Puerto Ric...

4 Mai 19min

Inside The OIG Interview: The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 14) (5/4/26)

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing le...

4 Mai 14min