“An unexplained annual spike in false claims on the EA Forum” by Tobias Häberli

“An unexplained annual spike in false claims on the EA Forum” by Tobias Häberli

Epistemic status: Very high confidence in the statistical findings. Genuinely confused about the cause. For reasons that will become obvious, I wanted to publish this post on March 31, but unfortunately I could only get it done today.

I've been building a classifier to flag potentially misleading content on the EA Forum as part of a side project on epistemics infrastructure. While validating the model, I noticed something I initially assumed was a bug. This is an interim report on that.


Summary: Every year, on April 1, the rate of posts containing verifiably untrue claims spikes by roughly 2,200% relative to the annual daily average (p < 0.0001, 8 years of Forum data).


1. The effect is enormous

On a typical day, approximately 2 to 4% of Forum posts contain claims that are verifiably false. On April 1, this rises to 57–73%, depending on the year. For context, this is an implausibly large effect by normal social-science standards. I have genuinely never seen anything like it.

2. It repeats every year

This is not a one-off event. The pattern recurs in every year of the dataset.

3. "It's only one day" is misleading

A natural reaction is that [...]


---

Outline:

(01:00) 1. The effect is enormous

(01:38) 2. It repeats every year

(01:57) 3. Its only one day is misleading

(02:57) 4. The false posts are high effort

(03:21) Possible explanations

(03:30) Why this matters

(04:48) Proposed interventions

---

First published:
April 1st, 2026

Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/EAokRDmQTjCAWgGdq/an-unexplained-annual-spike-in-false-claims-on-the-ea-forum

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(250)

“Pivotal Research Fellowship Q1 2027 Applications Open (deadline November 1)” by Tobias Häberli, Elinor Oren

“Pivotal Research Fellowship Q1 2027 Applications Open (deadline November 1)” by Tobias Häberli, Elinor Oren

Advanced AI could go badly wrong for humanity. Pivotal exists to lower that risk. We try to find the strongest new researchers and put them to work on it with experienced mentors in our fellowship. TL...

9 Okt 5min

“Clarifying types of rogue AI activity: Breakout, breakin, exfiltration, … What’s what?” by Oliver Sourbut

“Clarifying types of rogue AI activity: Breakout, breakin, exfiltration, … What’s what?” by Oliver Sourbut

In case you haven’t heard, the rogue AI agents are here. From an insider's perspective, the real news is that (rogue) AI is in the news — this is all stuff we’ve foreseen and been trying to warn peopl...

9 Okt 19min

“The Public Intellectual Is Dead. And AI Has Killed Them.” by Walter Veit

“The Public Intellectual Is Dead. And AI Has Killed Them.” by Walter Veit

Crosspost Once upon a time, public intellectuals routinely made it into the news to discuss political, economic, medical, and scientific issues. To some extent, this is still true, but the appreciatio...

9 Okt 8min

“Epistemic security as infrastructure” by David Ritter

“Epistemic security as infrastructure” by David Ritter

Hey folks -- At EA Forum next week, I'd like to engage with people who are interested in epistemic security -- the ability of a society to reliably avert threats to the processes that produce reliable...

9 Okt 1min

“Why you should run a rationality group at your university” by Carolanne Jiang, Noah Birnbaum

“Why you should run a rationality group at your university” by Carolanne Jiang, Noah Birnbaum

This post was cross posted from LessWrong TL;DR: If you enjoy LessWrong (and/or do EA/AI safety field building), you should consider starting a rationality reading group at your university. It's fun...

9 Okt 8min

“Proof of useful work for verifying AI treaties” by Ondřej_Kubů 🔸

“Proof of useful work for verifying AI treaties” by Ondřej_Kubů 🔸

Audio note: this post contains a lot of mathematical notation. We narrate the simpler formulas and flag the complex ones, so you may want the original text to hand. Cross-posted from my website and ...

9 Okt 41min

“Technical people: actually consider comms” by meemi

“Technical people: actually consider comms” by meemi

For years I had a blindspot in my thinking. I dismissed policy and advocacy work as “in another [lower-status] category” because I’m obviously a technical person! Even when I felt super pessimistic ab...

9 Okt 2min

“AI Scaling vs Human Scaling” by Toby_Ord

“AI Scaling vs Human Scaling” by Toby_Ord

Audio note: this post contains a lot of mathematical notation. We narrate the simpler formulas and flag the complex ones, so you may want the original text to hand. Do AI models scale as well with m...

9 Okt 13min

Populært innen Samfunn

rss-spartsklubben
giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
konspirasjonspodden
aftenpodden-usa
popradet
rss-nesten-hele-uka-med-lepperod
rss-henlagt-andy-larsgaard
alt-fortalt
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
wolfgang-wee-uncut
grenselos
fladseth
min-barneoppdragelse
synnve-og-vanessa
rss-dette-ma-aldri-skje-igjen
rss-herrepanelet
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-siktet
opptur-med-annette-og-ingeborg