Trumpworld’s Overlap: Kushner’s Invitation to Jeffrey Epstein In 2013

Trumpworld’s Overlap: Kushner’s Invitation to Jeffrey Epstein In 2013

In 2013, Jared Kushner extended an invitation to Jeffrey Epstein for a Trump family event, a move that looks worse with every passing year and every new revelation. By that point, Epstein wasn’t some misunderstood financier or eccentric recluse. He was a convicted sex offender whose crimes were well-documented, widely reported, and inexcusable. Yet somehow, he still made the guest list for an event tied directly to one of the most image-obsessed families in American public life. Kushner’s spokesperson later tried to claim that Epstein never attended and that Kushner had never even met him, but the invitation alone exposes a damning level of proximity. It reveals a world where a man like Epstein still had enough social currency to be casually ushered toward the inner orbit of political royalty.

What makes this even more infuriating is how aggressively people have tried to memory-hole this detail. Epstein wasn’t invited by some random cousin or a clueless PR assistant. He received an invitation linked to the husband of Ivanka Trump—someone who was not only a member of the family but a rising political strategist shaping the future of the Republican Party. Kushner’s attempt to distance himself after the fact doesn’t erase the paper trail or the undeniable truth that Epstein was still circulating among power brokers long after his conviction. It underscores a much larger pattern: the powerful knew exactly who Epstein was, and they still opened their doors for him. That is what makes the 2013 invitation so damning, and why no amount of post-hoc denial can scrub the stain of it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Jared Kushner's company invited Jeffrey Epstein to star-studded NYC party with Trump and Harvey Weinstein | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Episoder(1000)

Mega Edition:   Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 7-9)  (4/20/26)

Mega Edition: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 7-9) (4/20/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge...

20 Apr 43min

Mega Edition:   Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 4-6)  (4/20/26)

Mega Edition: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 4-6) (4/20/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge...

20 Apr 40min

Mega Edition:   Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 1-3)  (4/19/26)

Mega Edition: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 1-3) (4/19/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge...

20 Apr 43min

Mike Johnson Slips: Did He Admit That Epstein Was an Intelligence Tool?

Mike Johnson Slips: Did He Admit That Epstein Was an Intelligence Tool?

In his recent remarks about the Jeffrey Epstein files, Mike Johnson shifted from publicly demanding transparency to cautioning that the disclosure could “publicly reveal the identity … of undercover l...

20 Apr 11min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

20 Apr 13min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

19 Apr 12min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

19 Apr 13min

Inside The OIG Interview:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 18) (4/19/26)

Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 18) (4/19/26)

Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to i...

19 Apr 11min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
forklart
stopp-verden
popradet
det-store-bildet
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-gukild-johaug
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
aftenbla-bla
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
e24-podden
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
frokostshowet-pa-p5
bt-dokumentar-2