Guardianship, not paternalism: A different way to think about surrogacy and the state

Guardianship, not paternalism: A different way to think about surrogacy and the state

Before the NSW Legislative Council even asked its first question, we made a deliberate choice: to shift the entire frame of the hearing. In this short episode, Emma and Megan discuss the opening statement we delivered to the inquiry, and the political philosophy driving it.

They explore what it means to say that parliamentarians hold power but not rights against the citizens they represent; why guardianship and paternalism are fundamentally different ideas, and why that distinction matters enormously in the surrogacy debate; and how accepting the framing of 'fertility support' stewardship quietly forecloses the most important question of all — whether this market should exist at all.

If you have ever wondered why the opening move in an inquiry matters as much as the evidence that follows, this conversation explains it.

__

Donate

If you wish to donate to AAWAA you can do so by making a direct deposit or bank transfer to:

  • Account name: Affiliation of Australian Women’s Advocacy Alliances
  • Account number: 04201471
  • BSB: 325-185

__

Disclosure statement

Some voices in this podcast are AI-generated clones of real, named AAWAA members, created and used with their informed consent to help amplify women's words and stories. All scripts and spoken content are written by AAWAA women, and all editorial judgement, fact-checking, and production decisions remain entirely human. AI is used only to voice this content: never to generate, alter, or invent what is said. Learn more at womensadvocacy.net.



This podcast provides general information and opinion only and does not constitute legal advice. Listeners should seek independent, professional legal advice before acting on any matters discussed. The hosts and AAWAA accept no liability for decisions made based on this content.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(104)

Different standards in sport and online: Protecting women and girls

Different standards in sport and online: Protecting women and girls

Women’s protection should survive a portfolio change. At the National Press Club, Anika Wells argued that institutions must take responsibility for preventing online harm and recognised that online en...

15 Okt 11min

Surrogacy laws and parliamentary process: An interview with Hon Michelle Hofmann MLC

Surrogacy laws and parliamentary process: An interview with Hon Michelle Hofmann MLC

The Hon Michelle Hofmann MLC, member of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia, speaks to Amber from The Women's Advocate about Ms Hofmann's fight against the Assisted Reproduc...

8 Okt 15min

Female association depends on naming sex: The question now before the UN

Female association depends on naming sex: The question now before the UN

In this episode, Emma and Lucy discuss AAWAA's submission to the UN Human Rights Committee on its draft General Comment on freedom of association. They cover why women's associations depend on organis...

1 Okt 11min

Why sex-neutral language fails family violence policy

Why sex-neutral language fails family violence policy

In this episode, Emma and Lucy discuss two recent submissions on family violence, one to the Tasmanian Government, one to the federal Second Action Plan consultation, both built on the same argument: ...

27 Sep 12min

TUF. Be kind, part I: An instruction, not a virtue (The Unmoved Feminist)

TUF. Be kind, part I: An instruction, not a virtue (The Unmoved Feminist)

In this episode of The Unmoved Feminist, Martine and Liv take apart the idea that 'be kind' is a harmless, universal instruction. Drawing on Robin Lakoff, Dale Spender and Sandra Lee Bartky, they trac...

24 Sep 13min

Women, structural harm, and where a digital duty of care needs to begin

Women, structural harm, and where a digital duty of care needs to begin

Emma and Lucy unpack a gap in the Digital Duty of Care Bill: harms from pornography and misogynist material are fixed directly into law for children, but for adult women, the same harms are left to a ...

17 Sep 10min

What a new FOI release reveals about the ALRC surrogacy laws review

What a new FOI release reveals about the ALRC surrogacy laws review

Emma and Amber unpack a newly released Freedom of Information document showing how the Attorney-General's Department and the Australian Law Reform Commission negotiated the terms of reference for the ...

16 Sep 9min

Women are not for use and children are not for transfer: The Melbourne Declaration to Abolish Surrogacy

Women are not for use and children are not for transfer: The Melbourne Declaration to Abolish Surrogacy

As the Australian Law Reform Commission prepares to provide its report on surrogacy laws, Megan and Amber read the Melbourne Declaration to Abolish Surrogacy in full. The Declaration emerged from the ...

10 Sep 14min

Populært innen Fakta

fastlegen
dine-penger-pengeradet
fryktlos
rss-kunsten-a-leve
relasjonspodden-med-dora-thorhallsdottir-kjersti-idem
rss-strid
rss-bisarr-historie
treningspodden
foreldreradet
jakt-og-fiskepodden
rss-orjasater
sinnsyn
hverdagspsyken
mikkels-paskenotter
takk-og-lov-med-anine-kierulf
dopet
gravid-uke-for-uke
rss-mind-body-podden
hr-podden-2
rss-var-forste-kaffe