From Two Weeks to Three Days: The KEV Deadline Debate

From Two Weeks to Three Days: The KEV Deadline Debate

Drawing on his experience from his time in government working directly on CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, Todd Beardsley, VP of Security Research at runZero, explains what it actually took behind the scenes to get a vulnerability added: verifying that real exploitation occurred, confirming the incident mattered to federal interests (including state/local governments, critical infrastructure, or allied nations), and ensuring there was a concrete remediation option before publishing. He walks Greg through how those judgments tied back to Binding Operational Directive 22-01 and how deadlines were set and adjusted from the two-week baseline—context that frames the recent trend toward three-day turnaround requirements. From that insider perspective, Beardsley outlines the practical risks of compressing timelines (especially around testing and change-control realities across 100+ civilian agencies) and why ultra-short deadlines can dilute KEV’s value as an “urgency signal,” even as they may push agencies to modernize staffing, automation, and patch processes to respond faster.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(138)

Zero days, zero order: The chaos reshaping vulnerability disclosure

Zero days, zero order: The chaos reshaping vulnerability disclosure

The rules of responsible disclosure were written for a different era — one where humans found bugs, humans reported them, and 90 days felt like plenty of time to patch. That era is over. In this epis...

18 Jun 40min

Why the autonomous SOC Is the wrong goal

Why the autonomous SOC Is the wrong goal

On this week's episode, we're joined by Mike Nichols, General Manager of Security at Elastic, fresh off the Gartner Security and Risk Summit in the D.C. area, where AI dominated every conversation on ...

11 Jun 33min

The last layer standing

The last layer standing

What happens when an "assume breach" scenario turns into a total corporate wipeout? In this episode of Safe Mode, host Greg welcomes Brandon Willitts, Director of Cyber Resilience at Everpure, to pull...

4 Jun 35min

Can specialized security survive Daybreak and Mythos?

Can specialized security survive Daybreak and Mythos?

In this episode, we sit down with Lior Div, CEO of 7AI, at a moment when the ground is shifting under the entire security industry. With AI lowering the barrier to entry for attackers, supply chain co...

21 Mai 38min

Why access brokers have stubbornly remained successful

Why access brokers have stubbornly remained successful

Anna Pham of Huntress joins Safe Mode to discuss the current landscape of initial access brokers and how their tactics continue to support ransomware operations. She explains that attackers are still ...

14 Mai 31min

Can you prove which agent did what?

Can you prove which agent did what?

In this week's episode, Greg Otto talks with Howard Ting, CEO of Opal Security, about the growing security challenges created by AI agents inside the enterprise, especially around identity governance,...

7 Mai 28min

How government and Industry can raise the cost of cybercrime

How government and Industry can raise the cost of cybercrime

Sophos CEO Joe Levy and Director of Government Partnerships Alex Rose join Safe Mode from Washington, D.C. to discuss what meaningful public-private cybersecurity partnership looks like right now—movi...

30 Apr 43min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
forklart
fotballpodden-2
popradet
stopp-verden
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
nokon-ma-ga
det-store-bildet
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
dine-penger-pengeradet
hanna-de-heldige
rss-gukild-johaug
rss-ness
aftenbla-bla
i-retten
frokostshowet-pa-p5
e24-podden
rss-utenrikskomiteen-med-bogen-og-grasvik