Lindsay Clancy’s Lone Holdout Was Accused of Ignoring WHAT?!

Lindsay Clancy’s Lone Holdout Was Accused of Ignoring WHAT?!

The Lindsay Clancy holdout controversy centers on what the jury foreperson allegedly reported to the court, not simply on a juror voting differently. Kevin Reddington said the foreperson identified one juror who acknowledged doubt but would not apply Judge William Sullivan’s instruction on reasonable doubt.

That distinction mattered because jurors are allowed to disagree, including as a minority of one. Sullivan questioned jurors about their ability to follow the law and repeated the legal standard, but he declined Reddington’s request to remove the holdout. Seven days and more than 38 hours of deliberations ended with a September 4 mistrial.

The legal fallout did not stay inside Plymouth Superior Court. On September 8, Howard Cooper, attorney for Patrick Clancy, said online creators had spread false claims accusing Patrick of involvement in the deaths of his children. Cooper warned that appropriate legal measures would be pursued and said law enforcement had been notified.

Robin Dreeke, former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert, joins Tony Brueski to separate the observable group dynamics from speculation about what a single juror believed. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, explains why judges protect the secrecy and independence of deliberations even when other jurors report a problem.

Faddis then turns to the accusations involving Patrick and the legal exposure that can arise when commentary makes provably false factual claims about an identifiable person. The combined discussion follows two lines courts guard carefully: the independence of a juror and the boundary between protected speech and actionable defamation. Lindsay Clancy’s next scheduled court date is September 29 while prosecutors consider whether to retry the case.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #JuryDeadlock #ReasonableDoubt #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #DefamationCase #CourtroomCoverage #TrueCrimePodcast

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(500)

Lindsay Clancy’s 11-1 Split Got WHAT Response From Tim Cruz?!

Lindsay Clancy’s 11-1 Split Got WHAT Response From Tim Cruz?!

A mistrial usually resets a case. Lindsay Clancy’s left prosecutors with a reported 11-1 split and a public statement from DA Tim Cruz defending the theory jurors could not unanimously accept. Cruz de...

14 Sep 32min

Kevin Reddington Says WHAT Is Off the Table for Clancy?!

Kevin Reddington Says WHAT Is Off the Table for Clancy?!

Lindsay Clancy's mistrial ended one jury fight and immediately opened several others, including Kevin Reddington's public request for President Donald Trump to help his client. A president cannot pard...

13 Sep 37min

Donna & Wendi Adelson: Donna's Alleged Jail Script Said WHAT?!

Donna & Wendi Adelson: Donna's Alleged Jail Script Said WHAT?!

The Dan Markel murder-for-hire case turned a jailhouse notebook into evidence against Donna Adelson. Drina Bernhardt testified that Donna wrote a question-and-answer script meant to feed Bernhardt fal...

13 Sep 45min

Nick Reiner & Lindsay Clancy: What Separates These Cases?!

Nick Reiner & Lindsay Clancy: What Separates These Cases?!

Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are now sharing space in the same public argument: when does mental illness explain conduct, and when does the evidence still point toward criminal responsibility? Their...

13 Sep 46min

Patrick Clancy's Online Accusers Face WHAT Next?!

Patrick Clancy's Online Accusers Face WHAT Next?!

Patrick Clancy's lawyer says there may be consequences for people spreading false claims that Patrick was involved in the deaths of his children. Howard Cooper's September 8 statement said law enforce...

13 Sep 27min

Timothy Hudson’s Parents Are Fighting Over WHAT?!

Timothy Hudson’s Parents Are Fighting Over WHAT?!

Timothy Hudson’s parents are fighting over child support while he waits for trial in the Anna Kepner cruise ship murder case. The new petition from Shauntel Hudson asks a Florida family court to addre...

12 Sep 50min

Lindsay Clancy Went to Trial Without WHAT?!

Lindsay Clancy Went to Trial Without WHAT?!

Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney says prosecutors never put a plea offer on the table before her first trial. Kevin Reddington’s claim matters because Clancy was indicted on three counts of first-deg...

12 Sep 47min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
forklart
aftenpodden-usa
bt-dokumentar-2
stopp-verden
popradet
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
det-store-bildet
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
hanna-de-heldige
rss-gukild-johaug
unitedno
rss-ness
aftenbla-bla
e24-podden
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk