“76x cash transfers: too good to be true or a (missed) opportunity? An invitation for dialogue on a recent Rethink Priorities Report” by Niek Versteegde, founder GOAL 3, Channelijne (Chan) Hulshof🔹

“76x cash transfers: too good to be true or a (missed) opportunity? An invitation for dialogue on a recent Rethink Priorities Report” by Niek Versteegde, founder GOAL 3, Channelijne (Chan) Hulshof🔹

TL;DR

  • GOAL 3 is a social enterprise that created IMPALA, a patient monitoring and digital platform system for low-resource settings. There is also a GOAL 3 foundation that raises funds to ensure underserved communities will be reached.
  • A recently completed report from Rethink Priorities calculated IMPALA to have a cost per DALY averted of 7 to 17 dollars in paediatric care and 12 to 30 dollars in neonatal care. This translates to around 76× and 28× unconditional cash transfers respectively for paediatrics and neonates against GiveWell's bar, and roughly 11,700× and 4,400× on Coefficient Giving's scale against their 1,000× bar.
  • RP corrected for study design and robustness of findings by applying a 60% internal-validity and a 30% external-validity discount to our measured mortality effects, arriving at roughly 12% for paediatric wards and 7% for neonatal units.
  • RP concluded that even at 1-2% relative reduction, the intervention would still be cost-effective.
  • The post concludes with an invitation for discussion on what these results mean for further research and scaling of IMPALA.

Introduction

GOAL 3 commissioned the Rethink Priorities Global Health and Development team to provide an external analysis of the impact and cost-effectiveness of our product ‘IMPALA.’ IMPALA is a [...]

---

Outline:

(00:21) TL;DR

(01:42) Introduction

(02:19) Understanding the problem in its context

(04:12) Theory of Change

(05:38) What the RP report tells us

(07:43) Interpretation, strengths and limitations

(09:58) Reasons the estimate may be too low or too high

(11:50) Discussion: What would it take to fund scale-up now? How much more evidence, and of what kind?

(16:22) Next steps

(17:42) I want to read more about IMPALA, where can I do that?

The original text contained 12 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
October 7th, 2026

Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/fhGryFtF7iDnFEKtr/76x-cash-transfers-too-good-to-be-true-or-a-missed

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(250)

“Epistemic security as infrastructure” by David Ritter

“Epistemic security as infrastructure” by David Ritter

Hey folks -- At EA Forum next week, I'd like to engage with people who are interested in epistemic security -- the ability of a society to reliably avert threats to the processes that produce reliable...

9 Okt 1min

“Why you should run a rationality group at your university” by Carolanne Jiang, Noah Birnbaum

“Why you should run a rationality group at your university” by Carolanne Jiang, Noah Birnbaum

This post was cross posted from LessWrong TL;DR: If you enjoy LessWrong (and/or do EA/AI safety field building), you should consider starting a rationality reading group at your university. It's fun...

9 Okt 8min

“Proof of useful work for verifying AI treaties” by Ondřej_Kubů 🔸

“Proof of useful work for verifying AI treaties” by Ondřej_Kubů 🔸

Audio note: this post contains a lot of mathematical notation. We narrate the simpler formulas and flag the complex ones, so you may want the original text to hand. Cross-posted from my website and ...

9 Okt 41min

“Technical people: actually consider comms” by meemi

“Technical people: actually consider comms” by meemi

For years I had a blindspot in my thinking. I dismissed policy and advocacy work as “in another [lower-status] category” because I’m obviously a technical person! Even when I felt super pessimistic ab...

9 Okt 2min

“AI Scaling vs Human Scaling” by Toby_Ord

“AI Scaling vs Human Scaling” by Toby_Ord

Audio note: this post contains a lot of mathematical notation. We narrate the simpler formulas and flag the complex ones, so you may want the original text to hand. Do AI models scale as well with m...

9 Okt 13min

“I’m leaving the Center for Reducing Suffering to pursue independent research” by Magnus Vinding

“I’m leaving the Center for Reducing Suffering to pursue independent research” by Magnus Vinding

I have recently decided to leave the Center for Reducing Suffering (CRS) to pursue independent research on the possible implications of UAP and quiet expansionist hypotheses for reducing suffering. I ...

9 Okt 4min

“The strategic implications of staff opportunity costs” by brentonmayer

“The strategic implications of staff opportunity costs” by brentonmayer

Our ecosystem is bottlenecked by people who have deep context and relevant skills. This means that the time of people with context and relevant skills is very valuable: usually more valuable than thei...

9 Okt 6min

“Population ethics is a big deal, which is why I made this population ethics quiz” by MichaelDickens

“Population ethics is a big deal, which is why I made this population ethics quiz” by MichaelDickens

TLDR: Take the population ethics quiz here: https://mdickens.me/pop-ethics/ Population ethics is an oft-overlooked subfield within ethics. Many people hold views that they don't realize contradict ea...

9 Okt 8min

Populært innen Samfunn

rss-spartsklubben
giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
konspirasjonspodden
aftenpodden-usa
rss-nesten-hele-uka-med-lepperod
popradet
rss-henlagt-andy-larsgaard
alt-fortalt
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
fladseth
wolfgang-wee-uncut
grenselos
min-barneoppdragelse
rss-herrepanelet
rss-dette-ma-aldri-skje-igjen
synnve-og-vanessa
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-siktet
opptur-med-annette-og-ingeborg