Is It A Good Idea For Rex Heuermann To Be OFF Suicide Watch?

The recent episode of the popular "Hidden Killers" podcast brought to light the complex matter of suicide watch in jails, specifically focusing on the case of Rex Heuermann. Tony Brueski, the show's host, dives deep into the topic with psychologist Dr. John Delatorre.

Rex Heuermann's case has drawn attention due to the recent decision to take him off suicide watch. Tony questioned the wisdom behind this move, considering the potentially damning circumstances around Heuermann, wondering aloud if "he may be someone who would want to end it."

Delatorre shared the complexity behind such decisions, explaining, “The problem with the suicide watch is that it's too taxing on the resources of the facility.” He further elaborated that while Heuermann needs monitoring, he doesn’t necessarily need the stringent conditions of suicide watch.

When asked about the specific conditions and protocols surrounding suicide watch, Delatorre detailed, “When someone's on suicide watch, not only are there more frequent looks at his cell... they're also put in a smock.” This vest-like smock, often seen in crime-related documentaries, is primarily designed to prevent self-harm.

As the conversation progressed, Brueski sought clarity on how decisions are made regarding an inmate's placement on or removal from suicide watch. Delatorre explained that usually a "medical doctor" is responsible for such decisions, in consultation with the facility's main security officers.

The episode also touched upon the lack of family visits for Heuermann, and the attempts of public members, likely true crime enthusiasts, to interact with him. Such visits were, however, declined by Heuermann, indicating his reluctance or perhaps his understanding of the gravity of his situation.

In a turn to the collateral damage from crime investigations, the podcast also discussed claims made by Heuermann’s family against law enforcement concerning a raid on their home. They reported damaged beds, destroyed drain pipes, and general disorder, speculating on the possibility of their home being a hoarder house prior to the raid.

In answering Brueski’s query about the family's potential case against law enforcement, Delatorre commented, "I think a lot of that's gonna depend on what the warrant says.” He elaborated on the intricacies of warrants and probable cause statements, suggesting that if officers overstepped their permissions, the family could potentially have a legal argument.

However, the foundation of any such case will lie in the specifics of the warrant, Delatorre noted. If the warrant was broad, allowing officers to search any part of the home, the family's claims might not hold much weight. However, if it was restrictive, only allowing for a search of particular rooms or areas, the family might have grounds for a case.

The episode paints a vivid picture of the complexities surrounding criminal investigations, the treatment of those accused, and the potential collateral damage to their families. Both Brueski and Delatorre effectively highlight the balance between the rights of the accused, the safety of the community, and the efficient operation of law enforcement agencies.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com