Attorney Eric Faddis On Likelihood Of Alex Murdaugh Getting New Trial

As the saga of Alex Murdaugh's potential second murder trial unfolds, a new twist emerges with the involvement of Colleton County's clerk of court, Becky Hill. Her recent admission to plagiarism and allegations of misusing federal child support funds to pay office bonuses have cast a shadow over the case. But the question remains: Are these developments mere distractions, or could they significantly impact Murdaugh's quest for a new trial?

Attorney Eric Faddis joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these latest revelations. Faddis pointed out that while these allegations against Hill are eyebrow-raising, the focus remains on the possibility of jury tampering in the Murdaugh case. "Did this guy get a fair trial?" Faddis pondered, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

The credibility of Becky Hill is now under intense scrutiny, especially with sworn affidavits from at least one juror alleging her involvement in jury tampering. Faddis explained, "Becky Hill's credibility is on the line because she's saying, hey, this didn't happen." He suggested that these allegations of deceit might play a significant role in the upcoming hearing for a new trial for Alex Murdaugh.

The legal intricacies of the case are further complicated by the fact that the judge is already aware of these allegations against Hill. Faddis noted, "Even if they don't come into the hearing, one has to think, is that playing in the judge's mind?" This raises questions about the influence of external factors on legal decisions.

Murdaugh's defense argues that he doesn't need to show actual bias from any juror to obtain a new trial. Faddis clarified that while different jurisdictions have varying standards, Murdaugh would typically need to prove a credible allegation of jury tampering and substantial prejudice. "That's a huge burden," Faddis stated, highlighting the challenge Murdaugh's team faces in proving that the alleged tampering impacted the trial's outcome.

The difficulty lies in proving the influence of jury tampering on individual jurors' decisions. Faddis mused, "If even one juror would have disagreed, that could have resulted in a mistrial." This possibility underscores the significance of even a single juror's influence in such a high-stakes trial.

As the legal drama continues to unfold, the question lingers: Will the allegations against Becky Hill and the shadow of jury tampering pave the way for Alex Murdaugh to receive a new trial? And if so, what implications will this have for the justice system and those closely involved in this convoluted case?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com