#164 - Can Constitutional Free Speech Principles Save Social Media Companies From Themselves?
Open to Debate22 Mar 2019

#164 - Can Constitutional Free Speech Principles Save Social Media Companies From Themselves?

With David French, Corynne McSherry, Nathaniel Persily, and Marietje Schaake How should the world's largest social media companies respond to a pernicious online climate, including hate speech and false content posted by users? For some, the answer is clear: Take the fake and offensive content down. But for others, censorship - even by a private company - is dangerous in a time when digital platforms have become the new public square and many Americans cite Facebook and Twitter as their primary news sources. Rather than embracing European hate speech laws or developing platform-specific community standards that are sometimes seen as partisan, they argue, social media companies should voluntarily adopt the First Amendment and block content only if it violates American law. Should First Amendment doctrine govern free speech online? Or are new, more internationally focused speech policies better equipped to handle the modern challenges of regulating content and speech in the digital era? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episoder(457)

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
forklart
popradet
aftenpodden-usa
stopp-verden
det-store-bildet
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
rss-gukild-johaug
dine-penger-pengeradet
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
aftenbla-bla
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
rss-utenrikskomiteen-med-bogen-og-grasvik
rss-dannet-uten-piano
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
frokostshowet-pa-p5