Layoffs, M3GAN, Returnal, and Daredevil

In this episode of Geek Freaks Headlines, we break down the biggest fan theory attached to the four Avengers: Doomsday teaser drops: the “glitched timecode” numbers at the end of each teaser might be pointing to specific Avengers: Endgame time heist moments. We walk through how fans are lining those timestamps up with scenes tied to the Infinity Stones, why the Russo brothers calling Doomsday a direct follow-up to Endgame makes this theory feel plausible, and how all of it connects to incursions, Secret Wars, and Jonathan Hickman’s Time Runs Out. We also touch on the idea that even if the codes are a stretch, the themes across the teasers (home, loss, and what gets left behind) might be the real clue.00:00 Intro: the biggest Doomsday theory so far and why the teaser “glitches” matter00:15 The core claim: the codes line up with Endgame time heist scenes tied to Infinity Stones00:24 Why this theory has traction: direct sequel talk, incursions, and the road to Secret Wars00:37 Timestamp #1: The Ancient One and Hulk, the Time Stone, and the “it’ll be fine” assumption00:53 Timestamp #2: Avengers Tower, Loki chaos, and the Mind Stone plus Space Stone connection01:07 Timestamp #3: Thor and Rocket in Asgard, planning the Reality Stone grab01:10 Timestamp #4: Rocket and Ant-Man, space talk, and the Soul Stone discussion timing01:22 Bigger read: recurring themes of home, loss, and what’s left standing after it’s gone01:36 Comic corner: starting Hickman’s Time Runs Out and why it matters for Secret Wars01:47 Why theories hit so hard: the fun of clue hunting and community pattern spotting02:00 Wrap-up: what listeners are seeing and what to watch for nextThe leading theory says the teaser timecode glitches can be mapped to Endgame time heist scenes that reference the Infinity Stones.The Endgame connection feels stronger because Doomsday is being framed as a story that depends on what happened there, not just a vague sequel.Incursions and multiverse collapse ideas make the “small choices turn into big consequences” angle feel very Marvel right now.Even if the codes do not hold up, the broader theme work across the teasers might be the more intentional thread.The fun factor is real: this is the kind of shared “clue board” energy fandom loves when Marvel marketing leans into it.“Let’s talk about the biggest doomsday theory we got so far.”“A lot of us are out here to try to find patterns.”“I love this stuff. Man, this is so much fun.”If you enjoyed this breakdown, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a quick rating and review, and share this episode with #GeekFreaksHeadlines so more Marvel fans can jump into the theory talk.GeekFreaksPodcast.com (source of all news discussed on Geek Freaks Headlines)Instagram: @geekfreakspodcastTwitter: @geekfreakspodThreads: @geekfreakspodcastFacebook: Geek Freaks PodcastPatreon: Geek Freaks PodcastWhat’s your read on the Doomsday codes: smart breadcrumb trail, pure coincidence, or intentional vibes without a literal answer? Send in your theories, timestamps, and comic tie-ins you want us to cover on a future episode.Marvel, Avengers Doomsday, Avengers Endgame, Infinity Stones, Time Heist, Russo Brothers, Secret Wars, Time Runs Out, Incursions, Multiverse, MCU Theories, Marvel Teasers, Doctor Doom, Marvel News, Geek Freaks HeadlinesTimestamps and TopicsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall to ActionLinks and ResourcesFollow Geek Freaks HeadlinesListener QuestionsApple Podcast Tags

14 Jan 2min

Episode SummaryMarvel Studios dropped the latest Avengers: Doomsday teaser, and this one puts Shuri, M’Baku, Namor, and Ben Grimm (The Thing) in the same conversation fast. Frank breaks down the desert setting, the “preparing for war” energy, and why Shuri’s vibe feels like a turning point for Wakanda going into the next big MCU conflict. He also digs into the fun contrast between M’Baku’s kingly intro and Ben Grimm’s straight-up New York response, then connects the crossover to comic history. To top it off, Frank reacts to a Russo brothers post that frames these releases as “stories” and “clues,” and shares how he’s been rewatching the teasers to see what Marvel’s hiding in plain sight.00:00 The Avengers: Doomsday teaser is out and who’s featured00:18 Desert setting and “preparing for war” vibes00:33 Namor and Talokan in a dry environment and what that could look like00:41 Wakanda and Fantastic Four connections in Marvel Comics history00:57 Russo brothers quote: these are “stories” and “clues”01:09 Rewatching teasers for hidden details01:16 Geek Fix episode note: Marvel’s leak-and-release marketing strategy01:22 Wrap-up and what Frank wants listeners to spot nextThe teaser leans more on mood than plot, with a clear “war is coming” tone.Shuri’s narration and presence signal a tougher, more resolute Black Panther era.The M’Baku and Ben Grimm moment works because it’s all personality and contrast.Namor’s return raises practical questions about how Talokan operates outside the ocean.Marvel may be treating these teaser drops like a puzzle trail, not standard trailers.The Russo brothers framing suggests fans should watch for small details across all teasers.“Shuri definitely gives off the vibes like she’s done losing.”“They are stories. They are clues. Pay attention.”“It doesn’t give you a ton of information.”If you enjoyed this breakdown, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a quick rating and review, and share the episode using #GeekFreaksHeadlines. It helps more Marvel fans find the show.GeekFreaksPodcast.com is the source of all news discussed during our podcast.Instagram: @geekfreakspodcastTwitter: @geekfreakspodThreads: @geekfreakspodcastFacebook: @thegeekfreakspodcastPatreon: @GeekFreakspodcastWhat did you catch in this teaser, or any of the earlier ones, that feels like an intentional clue? Send in your theories and we may highlight them in an upcoming episode.Marvel, Marvel Studios, MCU, Avengers: Doomsday, Doctor Doom, Black Panther, Shuri, Wakanda, M’Baku, Namor, Talokan, Fantastic Four, The Thing, Ben Grimm, Russo Brothers, Trailer Breakdown, Superhero Movies, Geek Culture NewsTimestamps and TopicsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall to ActionLinks and ResourcesFollow UsListener QuestionsApple Podcast Tags

13 Jan 1min

After years away from Magic: The Gathering, a Christmas gift (the Avatar: The Last Airbender box set) has the host seriously considering a comeback. This quick solo segment breaks down the full 2026 MTG release schedule and which sets feel like the real “must-watch” moments.Along the way, there’s a candid take on Universes Beyond fatigue versus how hard the art and themes can pull you back in, plus a few personal hype picks (especially The Hobbit and a full-on Star Trek set). The episode wraps with a plan to relearn the game, shoutouts to friends who keep up with MTG content, and an open invite for listener tips.00:00 Getting pulled back into MTG after years away (thanks to the Avatar box set)00:18 The 2026 schedule rundown: what’s coming and when00:32 Universes Beyond thoughts: why crossovers pushed me away, and why I still get tempted00:45 The Hobbit set hype and why Middle-earth fits MTG so well01:00 Reality Fracture as the final in-universe set of the year01:04 Star Trek in November: instant buy, all eras, and my personal wish list01:17 Relearning the game and leaning on creators for pointers01:32 Listener call: what should I be paying attention to?2026 is stacked, and it’s easy to feel overwhelmed if you’re trying to keep up with every release.Universes Beyond is still the most divisive part of the schedule, but the right IP can absolutely reignite interest.The Hobbit feels like the crossover that naturally clicks with MTG’s fantasy DNA.Star Trek is the personal “all-in” set, especially with multiple eras represented.If you’ve fallen off MTG, having a simple re-entry plan helps: pick one set, relearn the basics, find a community, then expand.“I’m thinking about getting back into Magic: The Gathering. Haven’t played it in years.”“This is one of the reasons I kind of stopped caring about MTG… because they were starting to bring in other brands.”“When they did Lord of the Rings and that artwork. Holy cow.”“November… it is a Star Trek set. I will make sure to own for sure.”If you enjoyed the quick rundown, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a review, and share this episode with #GeekFreaksHeadlines. It helps more people find the show.All news discussed on the show is sourced from GeekFreaksPodcast.com.Instagram: @geekfreakspodcastThreads: @geekfreakspodcastTwitter: @geekfreakspodFacebook: The Geek Freaks PodcastPatreon: Geek Freaks PodcastGetting back into MTG after a long break: what should I focus on first? Starter products, Commander, Arena, local play, favorite channels to learn from, anything. Send your tips and questions for a future follow-up.Magic: The Gathering, MTG, TCG, Trading Card Games, Card Games, Wizards of the Coast, Universes Beyond, Lorwyn Eclipsed, Strixhaven, Marvel Super Heroes, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, The Hobbit, Star Trek, Commander, Geek CultureTimestamps and TopicsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall to ActionNews SourceFollow UsListener QuestionsApple Podcast Tags

9 Jan 1min

Disney’s live-action Tangled has its rumored leads, with Teagan Croft set to play Rapunzel and Milo Manheim cast as Flynn Rider. In this quick headline, we talk about why this movie comes down to chemistry, what Flynn and Rapunzel need to feel like on screen, and the big question mark: does Disney lean into the songs, add new ones, or play it safer and ditch the musical angle altogether?00:00 Casting news and quick background on both actors00:17 Why Rapunzel and Flynn chemistry is the whole movie00:31 The music factor and what Disney might do with the songs00:45 Listener reactions and sign-offTeagan Croft (best known for Titans) is reportedly Disney’s live-action Rapunzel.Milo Manheim (Disney’s Zombies franchise) is reportedly set for Flynn Rider.The make-or-break element is their chemistry and that push-pull dynamic early on.Live-action Disney success often depends on whether the music lands with the audience.There’s a real possibility Disney changes the song approach, or skips songs entirely.“When you think of Tangled, what’s the key? It’s going to be the chemistry between these two.”“If the chemistry doesn’t work for these two, the movie won’t work.”“Maybe they won’t do songs at all, which I think might be the safer bet.”If you enjoyed the quick breakdown, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a review, and share this episode using #GeekFreaksHeadlines.GeekFreaksPodcast.com is the source of all news discussed on Geek Freaks Headlines.Twitter: @geekfreakspodInstagram: @geekfreakspodcastThreads: @geekfreakspodcastPatreon: Geek Freaks PodcastWhat do you want Disney to prioritize for live-action Tangled: casting chemistry, the music, or the visuals? Send your thoughts and we’ll highlight the best takes in a future episode.Timestamps And TopicsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall To ActionLinks And ResourcesFollow UsListener Questions

7 Jan 54s

A brand-new Avengers: Doomsday trailer drops and it’s all X-Men. We walk through the haunting ruins of Xavier’s School, catch the classic Magneto and Xavier chess symbolism, then get a big Cyclops moment that feels ripped straight out of iconic comic panels. The conversation also digs into why this teaser plays like the emotional spine of the film, how nostalgia gives the X-Men instant stakes, and why Cyclops finally looks like he’s being positioned as a true leader.00:00 New Avengers: Doomsday trailer and why it feels like a memorial walkthrough00:12 Xavier’s School ruins and what “post-action” implies for the story’s stakes00:17 Magneto and Xavier chess scene and the ideological tie that never breaks00:20 Cyclops gets the big action beat with the visor-off optic blast00:28 The “large foot” tease and why it reads Sentinel-coded (not confirmed)00:34 Sentinels in past films vs a chunkier 90s vibe here00:47 Why Marvel might be framing the X-Men as the emotional core of Doomsday01:05 Cyclops leader energy and the redemption arc fans have wanted01:08 Personal Cyclops journey: Wolverine fandom, X-Men ’97, and comics01:20 Ranking the hype: why this teaser lands hardest so far01:33 Quick housekeeping: keep comment spoilers under controlThe trailer’s opening tone is grief-forward, like the fight already happened and the cost was massive.Xavier and Magneto playing chess quickly communicates legacy, conflict, and connection without exposition.Cyclops is treated like the trailer’s action centerpiece, which feels intentional.The Sentinel tease (if that’s what it is) suggests a threat that goes beyond standard Avengers-level brawls.The 90s-coded visuals and color palette tap straight into X-Men nostalgia.The X-Men’s Fox-era context gives them emotional weight, even if they’re “new” to the MCU.“Starting off this quiet walkthrough of, like, the ruins of Xavier’s school.”“Cyclops gets the big action punch, right?”“Marvel is putting X-Men as, like this emotional spine in the Avengers doomsday movie.”“They’re also positioning Cyclops to be a leader. The redemption he deserves.”GeekFreaksPodcast.com (source of all news discussed)Twitter: @geekfreakspodInstagram: @geekfreakspodcastThreads: @geekfreakspodcastFacebook: Geek Freaks PodcastPatreon: Geek Freaks PodcastIf you enjoyed this breakdown, subscribe so you don’t miss the next headline episode. Leave a review, and share the episode with #GeekFreaksHeadlines.What was your biggest “wait… oh snap” moment in this teaser? And are you buying the Sentinel hint, or do you think it’s something else entirely? Send your thoughts and trailer theories and we’ll read our favorites on the show.Reference (transcript): Marvel, Avengers, Avengers Doomsday, X-Men, Cyclops, Magneto, Professor X, Sentinels, MCU, Trailer Breakdown, Comic Book Movies, Pop Culture News, Geek Culture, X-Men 97TimestampsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesLinks and ResourcesFollow UsCall to ActionListener Questions

6 Jan 1min

In this quick Geek Freaks Headlines segment, we talk about Simu Liu once again insisting Shang-Chi 2 is still happening, even if Marvel hasn’t made it official yet. We also react to Liu confirming he’ll return for Avengers: Secret Wars, what that implies for Avengers: Doomsday, and why Shang-Chi’s live-action absence since 2021 has been so frustrating for fans. We wrap with a quick tease about the X-Men trailer expected tomorrow.00:00 Shang-Chi’s long absence and why the character still feels important00:16 Shang-Chi 2 “is happening,” plus the Blade comparison and Marvel priorities00:31 Secret Wars confirmation and what it suggests about surviving Doomsday00:44 Realistic timeline for Shang-Chi 2 and why it might be late in the decade00:59 X-Men trailer tease and sign-offSimu Liu continues to publicly reaffirm Shang-Chi 2 is in the worksLiu confirms he’ll be in Secret Wars, which suggests Shang-Chi makes it through DoomsdayThe lack of live-action Shang-Chi appearances since 2021 still feels like a missed opportunityEven if the sequel is real, the timeline could stretch further out than fans want“I sound like a broken record, but it is happening.”“I have a feel we’re gonna be losing a lot of people in Doomsday.”“It’s probably gonna be late in this decade that we get the new sequel.”If you enjoyed this update, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a review, and share the episode with #GeekFreaksHeadlines.Geek Freaks Podcast website is our news source for everything we discuss.Facebook: Geek Freaks PodcastThreads: @geekfreakspodcastPatreon: Geek Freaks PodcastTwitter: @geekfreakspodInstagram: @geekfreakspodcastGot a headline you want us to cover, or a hot take you want us to react to? Send it to us on social and we’ll feature the best ones in a future episode.Sources: Transcript provided by user , GeekFreaksPodcast.com, https://www.facebook.com/thegeekfreakspodcast, https://www.threads.net/@geekfreakspodcast, https://www.patreon.com/GeekFreakspodcast, https://twitter.com/geekfreakspod, https://www.instagram.com/geekfreakspodcast/Marvel, MCU, Shang-Chi, Simu Liu, Shang-Chi 2, Avengers Doomsday, Avengers Secret Wars, Marvel Studios, Destin Daniel Cretton, X-Men, Superhero Movies, Disney Plus, Pop Culture, Entertainment News, Geek Freaks HeadlinesTimestamps and TopicsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall to ActionLinks and ResourcesFollow UsListener Questions

5 Jan 1min

In this quick headlines segment, the host breaks down the report that Netflix wants a 17-day theatrical window for Warner Bros. movies if the acquisition goes through, while stressing what’s actually confirmed versus what’s still just reported. They compare that rumored 17-day window to the current 45-day standard theaters prefer, explain why Netflix would love the shorter timeline, and talk about what it could mean for the future of movie theaters. The episode wraps with a simple reminder that the deal will take time, and there will be more updates as new details come out.00:00 Reported 17-day window and what’s confirmed vs rumored00:16 Netflix’s public message about keeping releases “traditional”00:22 Why theaters want 45 days, not a throwback 90-day window00:30 Why 17 days works for Netflix’s release strategy00:43 What this could mean for theaters and how fans can support them00:55 Reminder: Netflix hasn’t publicly confirmed the 17-day plan01:08 Wrap-up and next updatesThe “17-day window” is being reported as what Netflix wants, but it has not been publicly confirmed by Netflix.Netflix has publicly said it wants releases to stay “traditional” and “industry standard,” which is part of its pitch around the acquisition.The current common standard theaters point to is around 45 days, which exhibitors see as the workable middle ground.A shorter window could front-load hype into opening weekend, then shift viewing to at-home right as word of mouth usually boosts later weeks.If theatrical exclusivity shrinks, theaters may lean even harder into event-style experiences, and attendance plus concession sales matter more than ever.“Let’s clarify what’s going on here.”“Netflix themselves have not said that.”“The standard is 45, and that’s what theaters want.”“Don’t sneak in candy or sodas. Buy them there.”If you enjoyed this update, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a quick rating and review, and share the episode with #GeekFreaksHeadlines.Instagram: @geekfreakspodcastTwitter: @geekfreakspodThreads: @geekfreakspodcastPatreon: GeekFreaksPodcastFacebook: Geek Freaks PodcastSend us what you want covered next, including your thoughts on theatrical windows, streaming-first releases, and what you think a “fair” theater-only window should be.Netflix, Warner Bros, Warner Bros Discovery, Movie Theaters, Theatrical Window, Box Office, Streaming, DC Movies, Entertainment News, Hollywood Business, Film Industry, Pop Culture PodcastTimestampsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall to ActionFollow UsListener QuestionsApple Podcast Tags

4 Jan 1min

Stranger Things may be finished, but the franchise is not slowing down. In this episode of Geek Freaks Headlines, Frank breaks down Netflix’s two planned spinoffs: the animated Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, set between Seasons 2 and 3, and an unannounced live-action spinoff that aims to explain the briefcase rock tied to Henry Creel’s origin. You also get a quick rundown of what we know so far, what sounds intentionally new about the live-action show, and why this feels like a smart way to keep the world going without dragging the original cast back in.00:00 Intro: Stranger Things continues with two spinoffs00:06 Tales From ’85: animated series setup, timeline, tone, animation vibes00:20 Live-action spinoff: briefcase rock mystery and what Netflix clarified00:39 Fresh start details: new town, new era, new characters00:45 Extra lore context: play and comics hints00:52 Possible timeline clues: WWII era and “invisible submarines” story thread01:06 Release talk: animated spinoff coming this year, live-action further out01:13 Closing thought and a quick Welcome to Derry shoutoutNetflix is developing two Stranger Things spinoffs, one animated and one live-action.Tales From ’85 sounds like a straightforward monster mystery with the core kid vibe, set between Seasons 2 and 3.The live-action spinoff is positioned as a clean slate that still answers lingering lore, starting with the briefcase rock.Netflix has clarified the rock contains Mind Flayer particles tied to Henry’s transformation.The Duffers are signaling “new mythology” energy: new setting, new cast, and no returning main characters.“Stranger Things is done, but we’re not done with this world.”“It’s simple, it’s fun.”“A new town, a new era, all new kids. It’s going to feel fresh.”“We don’t necessarily need to say goodbye to this storytelling that we really loved.”If you enjoyed the breakdown, subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines, leave a review, and share the episode using #GeekFreaksHeadlines.GeekFreaksPodcast.com (source of all news discussed on the show)Instagram: @geekfreakspodcastThreads: @geekfreakspodcastTwitter: @geekfreakspodFacebook: Geek Freaks PodcastHost: Frank (@franklourence79)Send us what you want covered next, plus any theories you have about where the live-action spinoff could land in the timeline.Transcript reference: Stranger Things, Stranger Things Spinoff, Stranger Things Tales From ’85, Geek News, Netflix, Mind Flayer, Vecna, Henry Creel, Dimension X, Horror TV, Sci Fi TV, TV Franchise, Welcome to Derry, TV News PodcastTimestamps and TopicsKey TakeawaysMemorable QuotesCall to ActionLinks and ResourcesFollow UsListener Questions

2 Jan 1min