PrivacyPod20 Jun 2023

#37: Exploring Landmark Privacy Cases with Professor Herke Kranenborg

In this episode of PrivacyPod, Joost and Panu talk to professor Herke Kranenborg who holds a chair in European Data Protection and Privacy Law at Maastricht University. In addition, professor Kranenborg is a member of the European Commission's Legal Service, which serves as an in-house legal counsel to the commission as well as represents the Commission in the Court of European Union in Luxembourg.

Professor Kranenborg has a interesting position in the commission as he has taken part in many of the privacy related cases in the European Court of Justice as a commission representative.

You can hear Joost being a bit starstruck with his hero in this episode, but in the end he handles it well.

Professor Kranenborg gives us an unique look into what it is like to prepare and argue in the one of the most important privacy cases in this decade from the commission perspective. We also discuss other landmark cases, so get your pencils ready! Or actually, you dont, since all the cases are listed here below.

And what is the most important case this year according to professor Kranenborg? Listen in, and you will find out.

Delivered judgments Judgment of 6 November 2003, Lindqvist, C-101/01, EU:C:2003:596
Judgment of 8 November 2007, Bavarian Lager v Commission, T-194/04, EU:T:2007:334
Judgment of 29 June 2010, Commission v Bavarian Lager, C-28/08 P, EU:C:2010:378
Judgment of 9 March 2010, Commission v Germany, C-518/07, EU:C:2010:125
Judgment of 16 October 2012, Commission v Austria, C-614/10, EU:C:2012:631 Judgment of 8 April 2014, Commission v Hungary, C-288/12, EU:C:2014:237
Judgment of 16 July 2020, Facebook Ireland and Schrems (Schrems II), C-311/18, EU:C:2020:559 Judgment of 6 October 2020, Privacy International, C-623/17, EU:C:2020:790 Judgment of 6 October 2020, La Quadrature du Net and Others, C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18, EU:C:2020:791 Judgment of 15 June 2021, Facebook Ireland and Others, C-645/19, EU:C:2021:483 - Advocate General Bobek's opinion: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:2021:5 Judgment of 24 March 2022, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, C-245/20, EU:C:2022:216 - Advocate General Bobek's opinion: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:2021:822 Judgment of 5 April 2022, Commissioner of An Garda Síochána and Others, C-140/20, EU:C:2022:258
Judgment of 20 September 2022, VD and SR, C-339/20 and C-397/20, EU:C:2022:703
Judgment of 4 May 2023, Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF, C-487/21, EU:C:2023:369
Pending cases CJEU DPC v EDPB I (Facebook) (T-70/23) CJEU DPC v EDPB II (Instagram) (T-84/23) CJEU DPC v EDPB III (Whatsapp) (T-111/23) CJEU Meta v EDPB I (T-682/22) CJEU Meta v EDPB II (Instagram) (T-128/23) CJEU Meta v EDPB III (Facebook) (T-129/23) CJEU WhatsApp Ireland v EDPB (C-97/23 P) CJEU Meta v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21) CJEU Endemol Shine Finland (C-740/22) CJEU Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde (C-33/22) CJEU LQDN and Others (Personal data and the fight against counterfeiting (C-470/21) - Advocate General Szpunar's opinion: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:2022:838 Full list of pending cases available at https://digibeetle.eu

Did you enjoy our show? Support us by buying us a coffee here: https://bmc.link/privacypod4u

We would love to get feedback – so please tag us, follow us, DM us, or send us traditional email:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PodPrivacy, #privacypod

Instagram: @privacypod

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tietosuojapod/about/

Email: tietosuojapod@protonmail.com

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(79)

#79: Stay Frosty – The Massive City of Helsinki Data Breach

In this episode, our experts Hannes Saarinen and Pilvi Alopaeus take a closer look at one of the largest data breaches in Finland, where an attacker gained access to the City of Helsinki's network dri...

30 Okt 202552min

#78: Jyri is still annoyed at (or with?) Noyb

We are back from summer break with a bunch of positive energy (that lasted through about the first two cases). This episode was recorded by Hannes, Jyri, and Pilvi on the historical day of data transf...

10 Sep 202558min

#77: PrivacyPod special: Breaking Down the Latombe decision

This PrivacyPod special episode was recorded on the very day the Latombe decision (T-553/23) was made, capturing the immediacy and raw analysis of a pivotal moment in EU–US data privacy law. Host Joos...

8 Sep 20251h

#76: The one that got us banned from a country we cannot mention

In this episode, Jyri and Pilvi have been fished out from the pool and summer vacays to discuss privacy–and they desperately try to be optimistic, it's summer, after all. Whippii. In this episode, we ...

18 Jun 20251h 1min

#75: Joost's Case Corner – wait…whose sex ad is that?

In this Joost's Case Corner episode Joost, Pilvi and Jyri discuss running and privacy. In fact, the cases on our chopping block today highlights that no matter how complex privacy is, it always comes ...

19 Mai 20251h 5min

#74: Joost's Case Corner – why carrots are orange

In this Joost's Case Corner episode Joost, Jyri, and Pilvi discuss why Netherlands you should go to Netherlands as well as some of the latest CJEU cases. On our chopping block today, are: CJEU Deldi...

30 Apr 202544min

#73: If you want something different, do it yourself

In this episode Jyri and Pilvi try to overcome their urge to discuss anything else but privacy and just be negative and tired of how the world is going, and after a while they actually somewhat succee...

24 Apr 20251h 23min

#72 An A-Mousse-Bouche (get it????) of recent EU case law

Once again, Pilvi and Jyri are joined by the legendary Joost, in another episode of Joost Case Corner and the magic of European Court of Justice (and Court of First Instance) case law! In this episo...

10 Feb 202545min