Michael Sandel on the Case Against Meritocracy
TALKING POLITICS24 Sep 2020

Michael Sandel on the Case Against Meritocracy

David and Helen talk to the philosopher Michael Sandel about the damage that the idea of rewarding people on merit has done to education, democracy and public life. Why is it wrong to try to match the best students to the best universities? What is credentialism and how has it warped the way work is rewarded? Whatever happened to the idea of the common good? Plus we discuss America's sense of itself as God's chosen nation in the age of Obama and Trump.


Talking Points:


Places like Stanford and Harvard have more than 40,000 applicants for 2,000 places. Most of these applicants are qualified.

  • Michael thinks that universities should admit students based on a lottery.
  • The meritocratic way of thinking about success and social recognition has produced and intensified an epidemic of credentialism.
  • Should elite universities function as arbiters of opportunity?
  • Even going to university hasn’t delivered what people expected.
  • How do we translate what we can see is socially and morally wrong about our society into a different way of economically living?


For decades, we have been told that the solution to inequality is individual upward mobility through higher education.

  • The ‘rhetoric of rising’ has run its course.
  • How do we affirm and renew the dignity of work?


What kind of jobs has the shift towards credentialism encouraged?

  • There’s a concentration around law and finance, as well as public sector or public administration jobs.
  • The financialism of the economy is an important part of this story.
  • The divide between winners and losers has deepend.
  • It’s not just inequality: the people on top believe that their success is their own doing.
  • Michael thinks that the sense of elites looking down on the less credentialed has fueled the anger and resentment that authoritarian populists have exploited.
  • Could automation displace credentialism?


The money people make, or the recognition they receive, is not a measure of their contribution to the common good.

  • It’s easy to outsource this kind of moral judgment to markets, but Michael thinks that’s a mistake.
  • Can we reconfigure the economy to bring about a better alignment between the contributions people make and the rewards and recognition they receive?
  • The pandemic has revealed the importance of jobs that are hugely undervalued, particularly forms of human care.


There has been a structural, material transformation in Western economies since the 1980s that has gone hand and hand with the rise of credentialism and financialisation.

  • Industrial manufacturing employment has gone overseas.
  • We are nostalgic about an age that no longer exists, including the role of trade unions, which had power in part because they could disrupt the economy through strikes.


What happened to the nation as a source of identity and belonging?

  • The United States is a providential nation; the same forces of meritocracy can be at work at the national level.
  • Is it possible to challenge the sense of providence in American democracy?


Mentioned in this Episode:


Further Learning:

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(379)

New Podcast: These Times

New Podcast: These Times

UnHerd political editor Tom McTague and Cambridge professor Helen Thompson team up to investigate the history of today’s politics — and what it means for our future. Each week they will explore the gr...

11 Mai 202352s

New Podcast: Where Are You Going?

New Podcast: Where Are You Going?

Talking Politics producer Catherine Carr returns to her role as mic-wielder in 'Where Are You Going?' a unique storytelling podcast, delivered in bite-size episodes.Called 'utterly compelling and uniq...

24 Apr 20233min

New Podcast: Past Present Future

New Podcast: Past Present Future

Past Present Future is a new weekly podcast with David Runciman, host of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians,...

21 Apr 20232min

Finale

Finale

David, Helen and Catherine get together for our final episode, to reflect on podcasting through six extraordinary years of politics, and what it means to be ending at the beginning of a war. We talk a...

3 Mar 202239min

Helen Thompson/Disorder

Helen Thompson/Disorder

For our penultimate episode, David talks to Helen about her new book Disorder: Hard Times in the Twenty-First Century. It’s a conversation about many of the themes Helen has explored on Talking Politi...

24 Feb 202246min

The Meaning of Macron

The Meaning of Macron

David talks to Shahin Vallee and Chris Bickerton about the upcoming French presidential elections. Can anything or anyone stop Macron? Why has French politics moved so far to the right? And what do le...

17 Feb 202245min

The Meaning of Boris Johnson

The Meaning of Boris Johnson

David, Helen and Chris Brooke have one more go at making sense of the tangled web that is British politics. Can Johnson really survive, and even if he does, can his brand ever recover? Is this a scand...

10 Feb 202252min

Putin’s Next Move

Putin’s Next Move

David and Helen talk to Shashank Joshi, Defence Editor of the Economist, about what Vladimir Putin hopes to get out of the Ukraine crisis and what anyone can do to stop him. Is some sort of invasion i...

3 Feb 202250min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
fotballpodden-2
forklart
popradet
stopp-verden
det-store-bildet
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
nokon-ma-ga
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-gukild-johaug
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
e24-podden
aftenbla-bla
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-utenrikskomiteen-med-bogen-og-grasvik
chit-chat-med-helle