Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Elucidations13 Jun 2022

Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence

This time around, Matt sits down with Rob Goodman to talk about political eloquence. Goodman is the author of a new book on this topic called Words on Fire, which you can pick up a copy of wherever you like to get books.


Can you think of the last time you saw someone give a rousing speech? They step up to the podium with throngs of onlookers staring at them. Somehow, rather than nervously scampering offstage or melting into a puddle, they speak off the cuff in a way that transfixes everyone listening. Their words feel fresh, sincere, and yet somehow also perfect, like a movie star nailing their big scene on the first take. You’d think that someone speaking from the heart would falter or stumble the way the rest of us do, but against all odds, this feels both maximally authentic and maximally polished.


What is it that makes a speaker compelling to listen to? Rob Goodman thinks that in order to understand what eloquence is, we need to look not just at the person up on stage and how they’re talking, but how the people in the audience are responding, and how the speaker is responding to their responses, and how they’re responding to the responses to their responses, and so on, ad infinitum. What makes eloquence happen isn’t really individual speakers talking in vacuum, so much as it is groups of people conversing together. Or at least that’s his idea. Eloquence isn’t just one person speaking skillfully; it’s several people conversing skillfully.


In this episode, our distinguished guest also argues that when a public speech goes well, it goes well because both the person speaking and the people listening are taking some risks. The person speaking is sort of on the spot, risking embarrassment, and the people listening might have to rethink their prior beliefs, which takes a lot of work, at least assuming they make an effort to live by their beliefs. When a speech does what it’s supposed to, these risks are shared between all parties, rather than farmed off onto just one. But when the speaker tries to give the appearance of taking risks without actually doing so, you end up with the audience shouldering 100% of the burden, and the exchange ends up somewhat dysfunctional. This, argues our guest, is what happens when politicians go to great lengths to control or sanitize the environment in which they speak, so that no matter what, they don’t embarrass themselves. Sort of like riding a roller coaster with a safety bar.


Tune in to hear more about what makes for a great speech!


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episoder(153)

Episode 81: Cathy Legg discusses what Peirce's categories can do for you

Episode 81: Cathy Legg discusses what Peirce's categories can do for you

In this episode, Cathy Legg talks about why Charles Sanders Peirce thought that existing was only one of three ways of being. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

15 Mar 201637min

Episode 80: Mark Hopwood discusses love and moral value

Episode 80: Mark Hopwood discusses love and moral value

In this episode, Mark Hopwood discusses the moral relation that results when one person values another as a particular individual. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

10 Feb 201631min

Episode 79: Anthony S. Gillies discusses conditionals

Episode 79: Anthony S. Gillies discusses conditionals

In this episode, Anthony S. Gillies shows us how difficult it is to figure out what if/then statements mean! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

6 Jan 201632min

Episode 78: Stephen Engstrom discusses the categorical imperative

Episode 78: Stephen Engstrom discusses the categorical imperative

In this episode, Stephen Engstrom discusses the principle that Immanuel Kant thought to underlie all of ethics. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9 Des 201532min

Episode 77: Mark Schroeder discusses reasons for action and belief

Episode 77: Mark Schroeder discusses reasons for action and belief

In this episode, Mark Schroeder discusses an example of how something other than evidence against a claim can give you a reason not to believe that it's true. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy fo...

13 Nov 201538min

Episode 76: Barbara Herman discusses gratitude

Episode 76: Barbara Herman discusses gratitude

In this episode, Barbara Herman describes the intricacies of the relationship between two people that is created when one does a favor for the other. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more in...

13 Okt 201542min

Episode 75: Malte Willer discusses non-monotonic logic

Episode 75: Malte Willer discusses non-monotonic logic

In this episode, Malte Willer discusses attempts to give a formal theory of commonsense reasoning, and how it differs from the kind of reasoning that has traditionally been studied. Hosted on Acast. S...

8 Sep 201531min

Episode 74: Christina van Dyke discusses gender and medieval mysticism

Episode 74: Christina van Dyke discusses gender and medieval mysticism

In this episode, Christina van Dyke discusses the medieval mystics, a loose collection of authors who thought through philosophical issues by writing about their religious experiences. Hosted on Acast...

7 Aug 201530min

Populært innen Samfunn

rss-spartsklubben
giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
konspirasjonspodden
aftenpodden-usa
popradet
rss-nesten-hele-uka-med-lepperod
rss-henlagt-andy-larsgaard
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
alt-fortalt
wolfgang-wee-uncut
grenselos
rss-dannet-uten-piano
min-barneoppdragelse
fladseth
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-dette-ma-aldri-skje-igjen
synnve-og-vanessa
rss-frekvens-med-anine-olsen
opptur-med-annette-og-ingeborg