LinkedIn Profile Autoviewing

LinkedIn Profile Autoviewing

Welcome to episode 132, I’m busy with training & speaking engagements this week so I pre-recorded this episode. Therefore if any big news has recently broken, I won’t be covering it till next week!

You may recall in episode 79 I interviewed the founders of an interesting product called Autopilot about their Chrome extension that automatically viewed LinkedIn profiles. As I have mentioned in recent episodes, I have experienced several issues with Autopilot recently and really didn’t feel that it was a product that I could continue to recommend.


I still believe autoviewing is a valuable and a potentially highly productive action on LinkedIn so I set about finding an alternative product to recommend.


What is Autoviewing?


Autoviewing is a simple task conducted via a browser (normally Google Chrome) extension. Once the extension is installed you are able to ask it to view a list of profiles from a search result on LinkedIn. Autoviewing extensions are ostensibly bots, i.e. a software application that runs automated tasks (scripts) over the Internet. Typically, bots perform tasks that are both simple and structurally repetitive, at a much higher rate than would be possible for a human alone.


As a free LinkedIn member you are currently only able to view 150 profiles per day** whereas a premium member (Business Plus, Executive, Sales Navigator, Recruiter lite & Recruiter Professional) you can view up to 1000 a day* *These numbers are subject to change at any time ** A LinkedIn ‘day’ is from 5pm to 5pm EST or


By the nature of autoviewing, it’s a numbers game so to get impressive results, you really need one of the above premium accounts.


Why do it?


LinkedIn’s most popular feature is ‘Who’s viewed your profile’. On average 8-12% of people viewed will view your profile in return, this figure can be much higher if you view people that are known to be more active (possible with Sales Navigator). So viewing hundreds of profiles in a day will lead to gaining a high number of profile views which raises your profile, increases the number of invitations to connect you receive and may even help to win you business. In addition, this high level of activity can have a positive effect on how the algorithm views you, i.e. you appear to become more ‘interesting’ and this can have a positive knock on effect to other areas of LinkedIn. The effectiveness of autoviewing is significantly improved with; A strong profile, with a good headshot and clear, compelling headline Viewing targeted (not random) search results, appropriate to your objectives.


Do LinkedIn Allow it?


I have never seen a quote from LinkedIn that expressly bans the use of autoviewing extensions but I think it’s fair to say that by using them you are in breach of the user agreement. Here’s what the user agreement has to say about the use of bots;


This however, does not mean it’s wrong. The definition of ‘wrong’ is entirely up to you - it’s a personal decision. I personally think that viewing profiles is a harmless activity whereas I believe that sending automated messages, skill endorsements and invitations is spam and therefore, ethically crosses the line.


LinkedIn has limits on the number of profiles you can view and this is subject to change so it is essential that the company you purchase an autoviewing product from is completely on ‘top of their game’ in this respect.


Whilst LinkedIn do not openly approve of autoviewing, it’s also pretty obvious that they benefit from it; It increases page views which helps them sell more advertising Users have to buy a LinkedIn premium account for effective autoviewing


The net result is that it is very rare to hear of people running into problems with LinkedIn when they autoview - provided they stick to the guidelines which are made clear by all providers.


At the end of the day, you have to make a decision on what feels right to you. As previously mentioned your ethics do not have to mirror LinkedIn’s rules!


The Options


I have come up with two alternative solutions, Dux-soup and eLink Pro, I like both for different reasons.


I looked at a product called LinMailPro initially but it’s main features are automatic connection requests and messaging and I believe those actions to be unethical - it also Autoviews but it’s more expensive than the following two options (due to those extra features).


eLink Pro


Features


Autoviewing of up to 800 profiles per day. Compatibility with Sales Navigator 7 day scheduler Download viewed profiles & who viewed you. Drip marketing feature. Posts motivational quotes for you. Will favourite a tweet from every applicable person you view. Semi automation of invite accept message. Adds some icons to profiles Shows number of followers in profile.


Advantages Substantial business that was established in 2014, has strong backing and 20 employees providing good customer support. Scheduling feature is very useful for when you are on holiday or away from the office for a few days. Free trial for 5 days and at the time of writing they are extending that to 1 another month for $1


Disadvantages Using LinkedIn in a different tab (whilst autoviewing) sometimes causes issues. It’s expensive at $147 every 3 months or $95 per month No ‘skip’ already viewed feature.


Dux-Soup


Features


Configurable autoviewing of up to 1500 profiles per day (not advised) Advised viewing numbers of 150/day for free LinkedIn users, 400 for Business+, 600 for Sales Navigator premium accounts Profile skip feature (skipped if viewed within the last x number of days) Google X-ray search feature (400 per day) Group members autoview Download of visited profiles (to .csv) Auto endorse skills Variable visiting speed (configurable) Re-visit based on previously downloaded CSV Notes and tagging of profiles Searching by tag


Advantages


Free service allows an extended trial to see benefits Tagging very useful, especially for this not on a Sales Navigator account Cost - only $15 per month for Pro version


Disadvantages


Small and somewhat anonymous business behind the software No scheduling Auto endorse feature encourages bad practice.


Summary


I have used both products extensively over the last month or so, interchanging between them regularly to make a realistic comparison. At the end of the day I think both are great and well worth considering.


Dux-Soup’s greatest benefit is pricing whereas eLink pro has the useful scheduling feature and the company behind it does give me more confidence of longevity and capable customer support is something not to be sniffed at given that the reason I am looking at these products is due to Autopilot’s deficiencies in that area!

Mentioned in this episode:

This show was created by the original host of the show, Mark Williams.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(496)

497. Collaborative posts

497. Collaborative posts

Voice note from Gillian Whitney on out-of-network content viewersVoice note from Mary Wu on profile URLs, plus some feedback on limiting postsGet your ticket to UpLift Live Nano Bristol for Thursday 1...

10 Jul 10min

496. Post visibility

496. Post visibility

PostbagNigel Cliffe voice note on limiting your post visibilityAshley Leeds voice note on automation toolsLionel Guerraz on connecting with your company's CEO Caryn Yuen on link display in commentsTo ...

3 Jul 11min

495. Creator Marketplace and company page collaborations

495. Creator Marketplace and company page collaborations

PostbagLionel Guerraz voice note about content reachCome to UpLift Live Nano Bristol on 17 September 2026 – a chance to ask your LinkedIn questions direct to me and get yourself a live LinkedIn profil...

20 Jun 9min

494. GIFs and games

494. GIFs and games

Voice notes with feedback from Nigel Cliffe and Meena McDonaldNative GIF support in LinkedIn commentsWend gameSolo and small business owners: join the Espresso+ community to improve your LinkedIn and ...

11 Jun 8min

493. Who is looking at your content?

493. Who is looking at your content?

Discovery analytics for in and out of network viewersShould you comment on content where you don't expect to reply?Why you shouldn't delete AI comments on your postsWhy you shouldn't use "comment X to...

6 Jun 12min

492. More about AI, plus the Video tab returns

492. More about AI, plus the Video tab returns

More chat about AI on LinkedIn, plus the return of a feature in the mobile app.PostbagTrevor Lambert about AIRoss Thorpe about AI – check out RooverseAshley Leeds about profile URLsTrudy Pannekeet abo...

30 Mai 15min

491. AI slop and glitches on LinkedIn

491. AI slop and glitches on LinkedIn

PostbagJudi Radice Hays: feedback on birthdaysJeremy Freeman: LinkedIn newslettersKathie York: Since LinkedIn likes to see engagement within the first hour of a post, is it still bad form to be the fi...

23 Mai 12min

490. Should you change your posting schedule and topics on LinkedIn?

490. Should you change your posting schedule and topics on LinkedIn?

What happens when you need to change your plans?PostbagLionel Guerraz: commenting and its effects on topic authority.Judith Rafferty: how do we deal with birthdays on LinkedIn?———The main topic is abo...

12 Mai 14min

Populært innen Business og økonomi

stopp-verden
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
e24-podden
rss-borsmorgen-okonominyhetene
rss-skravla-gar
pengepodden-2
rss-pa-konto
finansredaksjonen
tid-er-penger-en-podcast-med-peter-warren
utbytte
livet-pa-veien-med-jan-erik-larssen
morgenkaffen-med-finansavisen
okonomiamatorene
lederpodden
liberal-halvtime
rss-kron-podden
paretopodden
rss-impressions-2