The USVI And Their Request For An Epstein Related Summary Judgement Against JP Morgan (Part 1-2) (8/5/25)

Bradley Edwards, a longtime attorney for dozens of Jeffrey Epstein survivors, has been outspoken about Prince Andrew’s role in the Epstein saga, though he remains cautious given legal constraints. Edwards has said he believes Andrew does have relevant information about Epstein’s network and associations. He has suggested that the Prince’s connections—though not necessarily indicative of direct wrongdoing—warrant deeper scrutiny. Edwards has also reiterated that he is bound by client privilege, and so cannot disclose details if his clients have not permitted itEdwards, who has represented many of Jeffrey Epstein’s survivors, has aggressively pursued accountability not just for Epstein but for those who may have abetted or benefited from his operations. In public interviews and filings, Edwards has argued that Epstein’s transactions, travel, and relationships point to a far larger ecosystem of enabling actors—financial institutions, intermediaries, and elite figures—who must also be scrutinized. He has asserted that his clients deserve full disclosure, demanding that sealed and redacted documents be unsealed to reveal whether names of prominent figures were concealed under the veil of “privacy” or other procedural claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Okt 49min

In late 2022, a plaintiff identified as “Jane Doe 1” filed a civil suit in Manhattan federal court accusing JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operations by facilitating his financial transactions, ignoring red flags, and providing essential services to his network. The complaint asked the court to certify the case as a class action, representing all women who were abused or trafficked by Epstein during the period when he held accounts or related financial relationships with JPMorgan (from about January 1, 1998, to August 19, 2013).On June 12, 2023, Judge Jed Rakoff granted Jane Doe’s motion for class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, officially recognizing the case as a class action.   JPMorgan later agreed to a tentative $290 million settlement with the now-certified class of Epstein survivors, a deal which was subsequently approved by the court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Okt 22min

In her civil racketeering (CICO) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands, former Attorney General Denise George aggressively sought detailed financial records and transactional documents to trace how Epstein’s wealth was structured, moved, and possibly laundered through shell companies, banks, and trusts. Her office subpoenaed institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank, demanding account statements, wire transfers, communications, and internal documents tied to more than 30 corporate entities and trusts connected to Epstein.George’s subpoenas and lawsuits did more than simply map Epstein’s money flows—they asserted that major financial players may have knowingly facilitated or concealed elements of his sex trafficking enterprise. In December 2022, she filed a federal suit accusing JPMorgan of “turning a blind eye” to Epstein’s operations and of financially benefiting from themIn her effort to dig into Jeffrey Epstein’s financial networks under the Virgin Islands’ CICO (racketeering) statute, Attorney General Denise George asked U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska to unseal and grant her access to court documents, including deposition transcripts and filings in related Epstein-linked proceedings. In September of 2020, Preska granted part—but not all—of George’s request, allowing her to review certain sealed materials while still protecting sensitive portions.This decision by Preska gave George a stronger footing in her investigation, enabling her team to follow paper trails, understand prior testimony, and press subpoenas against financial institutions with more clarity on the evidentiary landscape. At the same time, Preska maintained limitations on disclosure, balancing public interest and transparency against privacy, privilege, and security concernsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Okt 34min

During Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 federal trial, prosecutors introduced a green massage table seized from Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion as physical evidence. They argued that many of Epstein’s sexual encounters with underage girls began under the pretense of “massages,” which were arranged and facilitated by Maxwell. The prosecution presented the table in court to demonstrate how the so-called massages were a recurring setup for abuse, forming a central part of Epstein’s predatory system. Former staff members testified that Maxwell managed Epstein’s schedule, often organizing and directing the girls who came to the house for “massages.”Investigators who raided Epstein’s residence found an array of incriminating items alongside the tables — including massage oils, sex toys, and suggestive notes — which reinforced the prosecution’s argument that the massages were a front for exploitation. Epstein’s former house manager, Juan Alessi, testified that Maxwell frequently gave instructions about the massages and even kept items from the massage rooms in her own bathroom. The evidence became a powerful visual and symbolic element of the case, underscoring Maxwell’s alleged role in normalizing and operationalizing Epstein’s abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Okt 18min

Prince Andrew was effectively pushed out of Buckingham Palace following the public backlash over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his ill-fated 2019 Newsnight interview. His charity initiative, Pitch@Palace, was told it could no longer operate out of the royal residence, with palace officials confirming the program would have to continue its work elsewhere. This marked one of the first visible steps in distancing Andrew from the royal household, as the monarchy sought to limit reputational damage while the scandal dominated headlines.In subsequent years, Andrew’s separation from the palace became even more formalized. Reports confirmed that King Charles ordered him to vacate his suite of rooms in Buckingham Palace, effectively ending his ability to use it as a residence or office. This move coincided with Andrew being stripped of his military titles and royal patronages in early 2022, underscoring his diminished status within the royal family and leaving him largely isolated from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Okt 10min

Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein, has repeatedly ridiculed Prince Andrew by questioning both his integrity and his willingness to cooperate with investigations. In public interviews he has called Andrew’s denials “despicable,” accused him of ignoring calls to assist U.S. authorities, and branded his behavior “an insult to victims.” He has also mocked Andrew’s infamous 2019 Newsnight interview, arguing that the prince’s vow to help was empty and pointing out that “defendants don’t pay money unless they’ve done something wrong.”Kuvin has further taunted Andrew’s evasiveness and urged him to “stop hiding like a coward,” insisting the prince should come forward and speak to U.S. law enforcement about what he knows. He has characterized Andrew’s ongoing silence and refusal to travel to face questioning as proof of guilt, suggesting that avoiding accountability only reinforces the perception that he has something to hide.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

6 Okt 13min

Back in September 2021, the High Court of England and Wales agreed to intervene to ensure that legal papers from a U.S. civil lawsuit could be formally served on Prince Andrew. Virginia Giuffre, who alleged Andrew had sexually assaulted her after being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, had filed her suit in a New York federal court. Her legal team had struggled to complete service under U.K. law and the Hague Service Convention, with Andrew’s lawyers contesting the validity of various delivery attempts. The High Court accepted the request (after additional information was submitted) and committed to taking steps to authorize service under the Convention, thereby removing a procedural hurdle that might otherwise have stalled or dismissed the case.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

6 Okt 18min

From the very beginning, confusion wasn’t a byproduct of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal—it was the blueprint. The overlapping jurisdictions, sealed filings, contradictory statements, and conveniently “lost” evidence weren’t mistakes; they were smoke screens. Every agency, from the DOJ to the FBI, played its part in creating a legal labyrinth so dense that the public would lose track of who was responsible for what. The result? A tangled web of “ongoing investigations” and “confidential agreements” that made it nearly impossible to follow the truth to its source. Epstein’s sweetheart plea deal, the destruction of surveillance footage, and the endless redactions were all gears in the same machine: controlled chaos that guaranteed plausible deniability at every level.And it worked. The public got dizzy trying to track timelines, jurisdictions, and shifting narratives, while those who pulled the strings quietly slipped out of view. Every layer of confusion—who prosecuted, who didn’t, who was “technically” covered by a deal—bought more time for the system to protect itself. Epstein’s death only deepened the fog, allowing the media, courts, and power players to endlessly recycle distraction while the core question—who else was involved—got buried under noise. The cover-up was never about clarity or closure; it was about exhaustion. Make it confusing enough, make people doubt their own understanding, and eventually, most stop asking. That’s not incompetence—that’s strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

6 Okt 12min