Mega Edition: Leon Black And His "Rap" Performance (10/9/25)

The Dubin family’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein runs deep and has been clouded by controversy for decades. Glenn Dubin, a billionaire hedge fund manager, and his wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin, a former Miss Sweden and physician, were both longtime friends of Epstein. Eva dated Epstein for years before marrying Glenn in 1994, yet even after their marriage, the Dubins maintained close ties with him—hosting dinners, traveling on his jet, and continuing to socialize with him long after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor. Epstein was also known to have been close with their children, reportedly describing the Dubin family as like “family” to him.However, those ties later drew intense scrutiny. Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre alleged that she was trafficked to Glenn Dubin when she was a teenager, an accusation Dubin has vehemently denied. Additional reporting revealed that Epstein had allegedly referred massage therapists to both Glenn and Eva Dubin, a detail found in Epstein’s own business records. The Dubins insist they had no knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities and considered him merely a friend, but the sustained closeness between them—particularly after his sex offense conviction—has raised ongoing questions about their judgment, credibility, and what exactly they knew about the man at the center of one of the most notorious sex-trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

9 Okt 56min

The television series The Crown has been widely criticized for effectively ignoring or downplaying Prince Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein, despite the centrality of that scandal to his public legacy. Although the final seasons of the show cover the period when allegations involving Epstein and Virginia Giuffre emerged, the creators elected not to dramatize Andrew’s relationship with Epstein or the ensuing lawsuits. As Newsweek noted, the show’s writer Peter Morgan explicitly stated that “Haven’t gone anywhere near him” when asked about depicting Andrew’s ties to Epstein.Instead, the show skirts around the issue by making oblique references or metaphorical allusions (e.g. a scene where Andrew discusses a movie about a 17-year-old seduced by older predators) but never directly engages with the core claims, legal actions, or public uproar. Critics argue this amounts to a deliberate omission, shielding the royal narrative from one of the most consequential scandals of the era.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

9 Okt 10min

Leon Black is an American businessman and investor who co-founded the private equity firm Apollo Global Management. He has been a prominent figure in the financial industry. Jeffrey Epstein, on the other hand, was a financier and convicted sex offender who was known for his associations with numerous high-profile individuals, including politicians, celebrities, and business leaders.The history between Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein is primarily centered around their business and personal connections. Black and Epstein became acquainted in the late 1990s through their involvement in philanthropic and business circles. They both had connections to Harvard University and its financial and academic networks.Black's ties to Epstein included financial transactions, personal loans, and Epstein's involvement in managing some of Black's personal finances.One of the most significant points of contention was Black's relationship with Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. Despite Epstein's conviction, Black maintained a relationship with him, including financial transactions.This relationship became public knowledge and raised questions about Black's judgment and decision-making, considering Epstein's criminal history.In January 2021, Leon Black announced that he would step down as CEO of Apollo Global Management amid increased scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein.An internal review by Apollo's board found that Black had paid Epstein over $150 million for various services and advice, including tax and estate planning. Black stated that he deeply regretted his involvement with Epstein and acknowledged the mistake in judgment.As the story continued to evolve, even more disturbing allegations were brought against Leon Black, including that he took part in the abuse of some of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. In this episode, we get an update on an ongoing legal case between Leon Black and one of his accusers, a woman who is also afflicted with mosaic down syndrome. (commercial at 10:24)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Leon Black's Down syndrome rape accuser says he sent private investigators to her house and to her parents' home after she filed lawsuit | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

9 Okt 15min

Ghislaine Maxwell’s defense team prepared to cross-examine Juan Alessi—Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime house manager—after his compelling testimony linking Maxwell to the logistics of Epstein’s operations. Alessi testified that he drove the accuser known as “Jane” to Epstein’s Palm Beach home, often on instructions from both Epstein and Maxwell. He described Maxwell as “lady of the house,” claimed staff were constrained by a strict household manual that forbade disclosing activities, and recalled discovering sex toys and pornography in intimate settings.During cross-examination, defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca questioned Alessi about inconsistencies between his trial testimony and prior statements in depositions or civil cases—particularly about when he first met “Jane.” He also probed whether Alessi had disclosed instructions to remove photos of Maxwell before female guests arrived, pushing him to explain apparent discrepancies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

9 Okt 20min

Jeffrey Epstein had a long history working for and with the government, even if they do not want to acknowledge it. One example of this is when he turned snitch on his former company and helped the feds put some of his colleagues away. Somehow, just like every other time he had a brush with the law, he ended up landing on his feet. The reason? He was being protected by certain elements in the government.Let's dive in and discuss it!To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://nypost.com/2018/11/28/pedophile-millionaire-dodged-harsh-sentence-by-ratting-out-bear-stearns-execs/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Okt 15min

In October 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Maxwell’s appeal aimed at overturning her 2021 conviction for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse minors. The appeal argued that Maxwell should have been protected from prosecution under a 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) that had been made with Epstein — Maxwell’s legal team claimed that the government’s promise in that deal extended to co-conspirators like her, across jurisdictions. But lower courts (including the Second Circuit) rejected that argument, and the DOJ urged the high court not to take the case, saying the NPA did not cover Maxwell’s prosecution in New York. The Supreme Court’s denial (without explanation) means the conviction stands and Maxwell’s 20-year sentence remains intact.Maxwell’s plea of “but the deal should protect me” now lies in ashes. The refusal by the Supreme Court sends a message: the serious, prolonged, documented role she played in trafficking and grooming minors for Epstein can't be overwritten by legal technicalities or bargains made behind closed doors. Her efforts to invoke immunity through someone else's deal were flatly dismissed, underscoring that privilege and high-social standing won’t shield her from full accountability for her actions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Okt 13min

Diddy may be sitting in a cell after his criminal conviction, but his real problems are only just beginning. The civil cases stacked against him—ranging from assault and trafficking to racketeering—are like financial grenades waiting to explode. Prison might have taken his freedom, but the lawsuits are coming for his wallet, reputation, and empire. With his income frozen, legal bills soaring, and plaintiffs lining up, Diddy faces a perfect storm of financial destruction. Every civil case uses his conviction as leverage, every filing drains more money, and every new accusation keeps his name in the headlines. He can’t charm or intimidate from behind bars, and the “Bad Boy” image that once made him untouchable is now his biggest liability.While he fights appeals and clings to what’s left of his empire, the civil courts are dismantling everything he built. Revolt TV’s crumbling, his business partners have cut ties, and his assets are being targeted from every direction. Even if he wins a few cases, the cost of defending them could ruin him. Bankruptcy won’t save him, since most of these claims can’t be erased, and the IRS and creditors are already circling what’s left. In the end, the criminal sentence may prove easier than the long, slow bleed of civil court—where Diddy’s money, legacy, and reputation will be stripped away piece by piece until there’s nothing left but the shell of who he used to be.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Okt 11min

FBI Director Kash Patel recently claimed on X that his agency has delivered on promises of "transparency," but the post was flagged with a Community Note adding context and pushback. The note reminded viewers that many documents tied to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein remain sealed or redacted, and questioned Patel’s assertion that court orders were the main barrier to releasing full files. Critics say the claim glosses over this opacity.Patel's broader handling of the Epstein matter has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers, who pressed him on whether all relevant records have been reviewed or disclosed. In recent hearings, he declined to answer some questions — including how often former President Trump appears in the files — and defended the FBI’s disclosures by saying they had released all "legally allowed" material.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Okt 13min