Is this investigation A Search For Truth Or  An Attempt To Bury The Epstein’s Files Forever? (Part 3) (11/18/25)

Is this investigation A Search For Truth Or An Attempt To Bury The Epstein’s Files Forever? (Part 3) (11/18/25)

The controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s associations—specifically targeting political opponents and several high-profile figures in finance and technology. The timing of this announcement is drawing significant scrutiny, arriving just months after the DOJ and FBI publicly stated that they had already conducted a comprehensive review of all Epstein-related materials, including more than 300 gigabytes of digital evidence, and concluded there was no basis to open any further criminal inquiries. That review asserted that the majority of evidence remained sealed primarily to protect victims and that there was no credible evidence of an Epstein “client list” or coordinated blackmail operation. Critics argue that the sudden reversal raises red flags about political motivations rather than new facts, particularly as Congress moves forward with a discharge petition intended to force the release of unredacted Epstein records to the public.

Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Episoder(1000)

The Mega Edition:   Jay-Z And His Motion To Sanction Tony Buzbee (Parts 3-4) (10/16/25)

The Mega Edition: Jay-Z And His Motion To Sanction Tony Buzbee (Parts 3-4) (10/16/25)

Defendant Shawn Carter, known as Jay-Z, has filed a motion for sanctions and dismissal of the complaint against him under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, arguing that the plaintiff’s claims lack legal merit and are unsupported by factual evidence. Carter asserts that the lawsuit is frivolous and intended to harass or burden him, violating Rule 11’s requirement that legal filings be grounded in a factual and legal basis. The memorandum outlines how the plaintiff’s complaint contains baseless allegations, lacks sufficient evidence, and misuses the judicial process. Carter’s legal team seeks not only dismissal of the case but also sanctions against the plaintiff and their counsel for filing the allegedly improper lawsuit.The memorandum further emphasizes that Rule 11 exists to prevent abuse of the court system and to deter frivolous litigation. Carter’s attorneys argue that the plaintiff's actions have wasted judicial resources and caused unnecessary legal expenses. They call for appropriate penalties, including financial sanctions, to discourage similar conduct in the future. Carter maintains that the court should swiftly dismiss the complaint to uphold the integrity of the judicial system and ensure accountability for those who misuse it.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions - FINAL(15510670.10).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Okt 21min

The Mega Edition:   Jay-Z And His Motion To Sanction Tony Buzbee (Parts 1-2) (10/15/25)

The Mega Edition: Jay-Z And His Motion To Sanction Tony Buzbee (Parts 1-2) (10/15/25)

Defendant Shawn Carter, known as Jay-Z, has filed a motion for sanctions and dismissal of the complaint against him under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, arguing that the plaintiff’s claims lack legal merit and are unsupported by factual evidence. Carter asserts that the lawsuit is frivolous and intended to harass or burden him, violating Rule 11’s requirement that legal filings be grounded in a factual and legal basis. The memorandum outlines how the plaintiff’s complaint contains baseless allegations, lacks sufficient evidence, and misuses the judicial process. Carter’s legal team seeks not only dismissal of the case but also sanctions against the plaintiff and their counsel for filing the allegedly improper lawsuit.The memorandum further emphasizes that Rule 11 exists to prevent abuse of the court system and to deter frivolous litigation. Carter’s attorneys argue that the plaintiff's actions have wasted judicial resources and caused unnecessary legal expenses. They call for appropriate penalties, including financial sanctions, to discourage similar conduct in the future. Carter maintains that the court should swiftly dismiss the complaint to uphold the integrity of the judicial system and ensure accountability for those who misuse it.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions - FINAL(15510670.10).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Okt 25min

1.4 Million Dollars In Extra Costs Were Incurred By The University Of Idaho In The Wake Of The Murders

1.4 Million Dollars In Extra Costs Were Incurred By The University Of Idaho In The Wake Of The Murders

From the archives: 8-17-23The amount of money that has been spent by The University of Idaho in the wake of the murders in Moscow is eye popping. With the total number coming in at over 1.4 million dollars so far with more costs sure to be on the way. The University was given a 1 million dollar boost by the state of Idaho previously, but they have already have spent much more than that.In this episode, we take a look at the bill so far and also get an update about Kohberger's court appearance tomorrow.(commercial at 7:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cost of security prompted by Idaho college killings tops $1.2M for university - ABC News (go.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Okt 11min

The Moscow PD Denies Keeping Families In The Dark During The Early Stages Of The Investigation

The Moscow PD Denies Keeping Families In The Dark During The Early Stages Of The Investigation

From the archives: 12-22-22On this edition of the morning update, we are diving right back into the headlines from overnight and taking a look at where the investigation currently stands as of this morning.(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders updates: Moscow police deny families are ‘left in dark’ as university offers self-defence classes | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Okt 13min

Former FBI Profiler Jim Clemente Discusses The Murders

Former FBI Profiler Jim Clemente Discusses The Murders

Jim Clemente, a retired FBI supervisory special agent and criminal behavioral analysis expert had some interesting things to say to Fox news about who this suspect might be and what might have motivated them to commit these horrible murders. In this episode, we take a look at what Mr. Clemente had to say and discuss the profile that he says will likely match the killer.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.foxnews.com/us/idaho-coed-killer-fbi-profiler-reveals-suspects-likely-attributesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Okt 14min

Social Media, Lawsuits And The Murders in Moscow

Social Media, Lawsuits And The Murders in Moscow

Ever since the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee, there have been people pointing their fingers at others without any evidence. From psychics to tarot card readers to content creators who fabricate information, it's safe to say that the circus has certainly drawn out the clowns.In this episode we take a look at the legal ramifications for people making threats and bullying others online and we also hear about the first lawsuit being filed over baseless claims made against a professor at the University.(commercial at 8:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Can social media sleuths be sued for wrongful accusations? | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

15 Okt 17min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 5) (10/15/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 5) (10/15/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

15 Okt 13min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 4) (10/15/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 4) (10/15/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

15 Okt 11min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
forklart
aftenpodden-usa
popradet
stopp-verden
nokon-ma-ga
fotballpodden-2
det-store-bildet
dine-penger-pengeradet
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-ness
rss-gukild-johaug
rss-dannet-uten-piano
aftenbla-bla
e24-podden
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
unitedno
rss-gilbrantsuvatne
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten