In Their Own Words: Theresa Helm And Her Lawsuit Filed Against The Epstein Estate (9/12/25)
Theresa Helm has alleged that Epstein’s estate has been uncooperative with survivors in terms of transparency, accountability, and compensation. She and other claimants have brought civil lawsuits against the estate, accusing it of rape, sexual battery, false imprisonment, and of perpetuating a system that allowed Epstein and his enablers to continue abusing and trafficker women and minors. Helm has called for the release of federal documents related to Epstein’s cases, arguing that they are essential for understanding the full scope of what happened, who was involved, and how much oversight (or negligence) there was.She has also alleged that many survivors were recruited under false pretenses (e.g. “job interviews,” modeling, legitimate opportunities), and that the estate has not done enough to address the harms done or to compensate victims fairly. Some of the lawsuits in which she is involved (including Teresa Helm et al v. Epstein’s estate) seek not only monetary damages but acknowledgment of wrongdoing, accountability for enablers, and public disclosure of records. Helm emphasizes that this is about more than money—it’s about exposing structural wrongdoing and ensuring survivors’ voices are heard.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
12 Sep 27min
In Their Own Words: Theresa Helm And The Building At 301 E. 66th Street (9/11/25)
Survivors and victims allege that 301 East 66th Street, a New York City condominium building tied to Jeffrey Epstein, was used as a hub in his trafficking network. Various witnesses say that people involved in coordinating, recruiting, or facilitating abuse—like Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adriana Ross, and others—had access to or worked out of units in that building. They’ve also claimed that underage girls were housed in multiple apartments there, sometimes several girls to a unit, and that the building served not merely as living quarters but as a location for parts of the abuse to take place.Victims also say the building was part of a broader system of control and deception. It’s alleged the ownership structure was opaque, providing a way to obscure who precisely was responsible for what went on inside. Some have claimed they were brought there under false pretenses (job offers or modeling opportunities), groomed, and then coerced into sexual activity. The claims include that Epstein—or people in his orbit—used the building to conceal the scale of the abuse and maintain oversight (staff, security, transport) so that the trafficking could continue with fewer questions.Teresa Helm gave an exclusive interview the Mirror recently and in the interview she talks about the time she stayed at Jeffrey Epstein's building at 301 E. 66th street. This building has long been rumored to be a place where Jeffrey Epstein and Jean Luc Brunel house trafficked girls, but very little has been disclosed about the inner workings.to contact me:In our second article...Thersa Helm is one of the women who was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. She is also one of the most vocal when it comes to his associates getting away with their alleged crimes. Now, in the wake of the document dump she is once again speaking out.In this episode, we hear from Theresa Helm about the document dump and how this new found interest in Epstein and his horrible crimes could catapult us closer to justice.bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
12 Sep 36min
Jeffrey Epstein And The Pilots Who Did His Bidding
Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilots became key witnesses during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, providing jurors with a rare, firsthand view of the inner workings of Epstein’s world. They testified about the many high-profile passengers who flew on Epstein’s private jets, including celebrities, politicians, and royalty, while also confirming that Maxwell was a constant presence who managed Epstein’s travel and household logistics. Their testimony helped prosecutors place Maxwell squarely at the center of Epstein’s operations, showing that she was not only his companion but also his right hand in coordinating the movement of both staff and guests.The pilots also corroborated the accounts of survivors by acknowledging that underage girls frequently traveled on Epstein’s planes, although they often claimed not to know the true ages of the passengers. Their logs, introduced as evidence, were particularly damaging, providing a meticulous record of Epstein’s flights and the individuals who accompanied him. This evidence reinforced the prosecution’s narrative that Maxwell was deeply involved in facilitating Epstein’s predatory lifestyle, while also cementing the aircraft themselves as symbols of the operation’s scope and brazenness.To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://blog.seattlepi.com/flyinglessons/2019/09/07/should-epsteins-pilots-have-foiled-his-child-sex-trafficking-ring/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
12 Sep 24min
Why Was The Public Corruptions Unit Involved In The Ghislaine Maxwell Investigation?
The Public Corruption Unit of the Southern District of New York played a central role in the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, underscoring how seriously the government regarded her alleged crimes. Typically focused on rooting out misconduct by officials and abuses of power, the unit’s involvement highlighted that the case was not treated as a routine sex-trafficking prosecution but one with broader implications for systemic corruption and the abuse of privilege. By taking charge, the unit signaled that Maxwell’s conduct—and her ties to Jeffrey Epstein—raised concerns that reached far beyond individual victims, touching on networks of influence and power.This unusual assignment was not lost on observers, who noted that it suggested prosecutors were framing the case as part of a larger pattern of accountability, ensuring that Maxwell’s proximity to wealth, politics, and international connections would not shield her from justice. The Public Corruption Unit’s presence lent the proceedings additional weight, reflecting an institutional recognition that the crimes alleged were intertwined with how elites exploited their positions. It also reassured critics who feared the case would be mishandled, presenting the trial as not only about Maxwell’s personal actions but about confronting the broader culture of impunity surrounding Epstein’s circle.To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ghislaine-maxwells-case-being-handled-by-sdny-public-corruption-unit-could-spell-trouble-for-u-s-elites/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
12 Sep 22min
Jeffrey Epstein And The Intimidation Tactics He Used Another Means Of Control
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein have consistently described how intimidation was one of his primary tools of control, ensuring their silence and compliance. Many testified that he surrounded himself with wealth, influence, and a carefully cultivated aura of untouchability, which made speaking out feel impossible. Epstein reportedly warned some victims that he had powerful friends who could ruin their lives if they tried to resist or expose him. Others recalled the presence of armed security, locked doors, and the isolation of being flown to private islands or estates, all of which heightened the sense that escape wasn’t an option. These tactics made young women feel trapped in a system where Epstein held all the power.Beyond threats of retaliation, survivors explained that Epstein’s intimidation extended into psychological manipulation. He would remind them of their vulnerability, their youth, or their lack of resources, exploiting these insecurities to keep them compliant. Some survivors said he kept meticulous records and hinted he had leverage on anyone who crossed him, reinforcing the perception that he could destroy them socially or legally. This culture of fear ensured that even those who wanted to break away often stayed silent for years. Their accounts make clear that intimidation was not incidental to Epstein’s crimes but a deliberate, calculated strategy to maintain control and prolong the abuse while keeping outsiders from intervening.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7779829/amp/Virginia-Roberts-posts-chilling-Twitter-message-claiming-Im-not-suicidal.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
11 Sep 14min
Ghislaine Maxwell Attempts To Get A Gag Order Draped Over Her Case
During her federal sex-trafficking trial, Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team pushed for a gag order, arguing that the intense media coverage surrounding the proceedings was prejudicial and risked influencing the jury pool. They claimed that sensational reporting and constant commentary created an atmosphere that made it impossible for Maxwell to receive a fair trial, and therefore sought to limit what attorneys, prosecutors, and other involved parties could say publicly about the case.Prosecutors opposed the move, stressing that the public had a strong interest in transparency given the magnitude of the allegations, Maxwell’s high-profile status, and the decades-long nature of the accusations. Judge Alison Nathan ultimately declined to impose the sweeping gag order Maxwell requested, emphasizing the importance of open judicial proceedings and finding that normal court safeguards—such as careful jury selection and instructions—were sufficient to protect Maxwell’s rights while maintaining public accountability.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/22/metro/ghislaine-maxwells-lawyers-seek-order-barring-prosecutors-talking-press/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
11 Sep 16min
The Death of Dialogue: When Words Are Replaced by Bullets (9/11/25)
The assassination of Charlie Kirk is not just a violent act—it’s a grim reflection of where society is heading. Instead of silence, grief, or even sober acknowledgment, the response has been grotesque celebration: memes, applause, and smug satisfaction from those who believe bullets can replace debate. This moment isn’t about Kirk as a person or his politics—it’s about whether words still hold meaning in a world that increasingly treats violence as the ultimate form of persuasion.The chilling truth is that if we normalize this response, no one is safe. To cheer the silencing of one voice is to declare open season on all voices, including our own. The precedent being set is not one of justice, but of mob rule—where disagreement can mean death, and where communication is abandoned in favor of carnage. If we don’t recognize the danger now, then we’ve already lost the fragile thread of dialogue that keeps civilization intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
11 Sep 16min
From Fringe to Front Page: The Media’s Great Jeffrey Epstein Rewrite (9/11/25)
The same voices that now brand themselves as guardians of truth spent years burying it. They didn’t just miss the story—they smothered it. When it mattered most, they mocked anyone who dared raise questions, dismissed survivors, and labeled investigators as “conspiracy theorists.” They weren’t protecting the public; they were protecting power, trimming out inconvenient facts to shield the reputations of their political favorites and social allies. Silence wasn’t ignorance—it was strategy.Now those same outlets stand on their platforms with furrowed brows and solemn voices, lecturing about justice as if they hadn’t tried to strangle the truth in its cradle. Yesterday’s “fringe” is today’s breaking news, and the very people who laughed off the facts are suddenly parading them as revelations. It’s not a moral awakening; it’s a performance. Their outrage isn’t about what happened—it’s about being forced to confront what they ignored. And that’s why their sudden righteousness rings hollow.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
11 Sep 13min
