Amarica's Constitution

Amarica's Constitution

Professor Akhil Reed Amar, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University and one of the nation's leading authorities on the Constitution, offers weekly in-depth discussions on the most urgent and fascinating constitutional issues of our day. He is joined by co-host Andy Lipka and guests drawn from other top experts including Bob Woodward, Nina Totenberg, Neal Katyal, Lawrence Lessig, Michael Gerhardt, and many more.

Denne podkasten er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(280)

What the Concurrences Should Have Said

What the Concurrences Should Have Said

The concurrence by three Justices (as opposed to that of Justice Barrett) in Trump v. Anderson concurs only in the judgment.  We look at different types of concurrences and why a Justice might choose ...

13 Mar 20241h 16min

Happy Anniversary Mr. Lincoln from the Court

Happy Anniversary Mr. Lincoln from the Court

The Court has ruled in Trump v. Anderson, and a strange day it was.  An announcement on a Sunday of opinion on Monday; no justices present; metadata weirdness, and worst of all, a unanimous opinion th...

6 Mar 20241h 33min

Staking our Claim

Staking our Claim

We’re back, and still waiting for the opinion in Trump v. Anderson, which gives us a chance to highlight important new evidence that has come to light - thanks in large part to Professor Amar’s great ...

28 Feb 20241h 4min

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said - Part 2

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said - Part 2

As promised, we return in very short order with the completion of our analysis and response to the oral argument in Trump v. Anderson - before the Court has ruled. Again, key clips from the argument a...

15 Feb 20241h 48min

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said

EARLY UPLOAD - The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson on Thursday, and we were so alarmed by the errant direction they took that we decided to take to the air early. Here are key ...

11 Feb 20241h 31min

20 Questions on Section 3 and Insurrection #1 - Special Guest Ted Widmer

20 Questions on Section 3 and Insurrection #1 - Special Guest Ted Widmer

Oral arguments are scheduled for this Thursday in the Trump v. Anderson case, concerning the possible disqualification of former President Trump from the ballot in Colorado, and with a myriad of quest...

7 Feb 20241h 47min

A Self-Educating Gaffe

A Self-Educating Gaffe

Oral arguments are approaching in the Trump v. Anderson case, and the nation is talking about little else.  At the Harvard Law School, Professor Amar is invited to debate a former US Attorney General ...

31 Jan 20241h 36min

The Amicus Brief - Part Two

The Amicus Brief - Part Two

The legal world is abuzz with the impending oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson in a couple of weeks.  In the forefront are the powerful arguments and compelling history that are introduced in the ami...

24 Jan 20241h 17min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
popradet
forklart
fotballpodden-2
stopp-verden
nokon-ma-ga
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
det-store-bildet
hanna-de-heldige
rss-gukild-johaug
lydartikler-fra-aftenposten
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-ness
aftenbla-bla
rss-dannet-uten-piano
e24-podden
rss-utenrikskomiteen-med-bogen-og-grasvik
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk