The Epstein Chronicles

In the early 1990s, specifically from 1992 to 1995, Jeffrey Epstein leased a former Iranian diplomatic townhouse at 34 East 69th Street in Manhattan—property that the U.S. State Department had taken over after diplomatic relations with Iran ended. He paid $15,000 per month for the lease, and at some point sublet it to attorney Ivan Fisher and others. The State Department later sued Epstein, alleging he had violated the lease terms by subletting without permission and failed to make proper rent payments, ultimately seeking to evict him.This arrangement has drawn attention because, at the same time Epstein was building his reputation as a financial advisor and philanthropist, he leveraged government-leased real estate to house his associates. The legal case underscores a pattern of Epstein navigating institutional systems—from government leases to elite circles—often stretching or disregarding the rules while maintaining a facade of legitimacy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/jeffrey-epstein-state-departmentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

24 Jul 14min

In September 2014, internal emails revealed that Jeffrey Epstein was invited to sit in on editorial meetings at Scientific American, one of the most respected science magazines in the world. The invitations were extended by the then–editor-in-chief, and Epstein was scheduled to attend at least two meetings. The emails show that the editor acknowledged Epstein’s interest in how scientific topics were selected and covered by the publication, implying that he may have been exploring ways to influence or replicate that process for his own ventures.Although the magazine later stated that Epstein ultimately did not attend those meetings, the fact that he was invited at all raises disturbing questions about how deeply embedded he was within elite scientific and media circles. It underscores his broader pattern of using money, charm, and institutional access to infiltrate areas of influence—including not just academia and research, but now journalism. That an alleged serial trafficker could get within striking distance of editorial control at a legacy science publication speaks volumes about the blind spots of power and the ease with which he operated under the guise of philanthropy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein Invited to Scientific American Editorial Meetings (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

24 Jul 13min

Spencer Kuvin, who represented multiple victims of Jeffrey Epstein, has consistently voiced serious doubts about the official claim that Epstein’s death was a suicide. According to Kuvin, Epstein was arrogant, self-assured, and utterly convinced that he would never face true accountability. He described Epstein as someone who believed he was untouchable, which made the news of his death feel immediately suspicious. In Kuvin’s view, Epstein’s narcissism and belief in his own invincibility made him the least likely person to take his own life while awaiting trial.Kuvin has also emphasized the troubling pattern of failed safeguards at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, such as broken cameras, inattentive guards, and questionable autopsy findings, as reasons to reject the suicide narrative. While not indulging in outright conspiracy, he believes the sheer volume of irregularities surrounding Epstein’s death forms a compelling case for foul play. To him, the idea that all of these failures were mere coincidence strains credibility and leaves open the possibility that Epstein was silenced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7386035/Attorney-Jeffrey-Epsteins-victims-believes-pedophile-financier-MURDERED.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Jul 15min

Melinda French Gates has described her single meeting with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 as deeply unsettling, stating that she “regretted it the second [she] walked in the door” and later referred to him as “evil personified.” She said the dinner at his Manhattan residence left her disturbed—uncomfortable with both the setting and her then-husband Bill’s decision to associate with Epstein. Her unease was so strong that she made her disapproval known directly to Bill, highlighting how Epstein’s presence and ties created significant tension in their marriageMoreover, Melinda has indicated that Epstein’s involvement with Bill Gates became one of the contributing factors in her decision to seek a divorce after 27 years of marriage. In her memoir and past interviews, she has attributed part of the breakdown in their relationship to what she viewed as Bill’s ill-advised meetings and connection with Epstein. The public resurgence of her comments—calling Epstein abhorrent and acknowledging how the revelations caused nightmares—has underscored her continuing disapproval of that association.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comTo contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10573431/Melinda-Gates-slams-Bills-friendship-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-CBS-interview.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Jul 26min

The DOJ’s decision to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell after years of declaring the Epstein investigation closed is being met with deep skepticism. Critics argue that the timing—coinciding with mounting public and congressional pressure over the Epstein cover-up—suggests this is less about justice and more about optics. Maxwell is a convicted perjurer and trafficker with zero credibility, and any cooperation from her at this late stage is likely viewed as self-serving. The DOJ’s sudden willingness to hear her out, despite previously insisting there was no further evidence, raises serious doubts about their motivations and whether this is merely a distraction tactic designed to pacify outrage.Rather than pursuing unprosecuted co-conspirators or unsealing the trove of sealed Epstein files, the DOJ has opted for a tightly controlled, low-risk meeting with a disgraced inmate already behind bars. This move is seen by many as classic “bread and circus”—a gesture meant to create the illusion of accountability without threatening the powerful or reopening the case in a meaningful way. Unless the government follows this meeting with real indictments, transparency, and bold legal action, the public will continue to view it as hollow theater—a last-ditch attempt to salvage credibility in a case defined by betrayal, secrecy, and elite protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Jul 13min

The DOJ’s decision to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell after years of declaring the Epstein investigation closed is being met with deep skepticism. Critics argue that the timing—coinciding with mounting public and congressional pressure over the Epstein cover-up—suggests this is less about justice and more about optics. Maxwell is a convicted perjurer and trafficker with zero credibility, and any cooperation from her at this late stage is likely viewed as self-serving. The DOJ’s sudden willingness to hear her out, despite previously insisting there was no further evidence, raises serious doubts about their motivations and whether this is merely a distraction tactic designed to pacify outrage.Rather than pursuing unprosecuted co-conspirators or unsealing the trove of sealed Epstein files, the DOJ has opted for a tightly controlled, low-risk meeting with a disgraced inmate already behind bars. This move is seen by many as classic “bread and circus”—a gesture meant to create the illusion of accountability without threatening the powerful or reopening the case in a meaningful way. Unless the government follows this meeting with real indictments, transparency, and bold legal action, the public will continue to view it as hollow theater—a last-ditch attempt to salvage credibility in a case defined by betrayal, secrecy, and elite protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Jul 11min

Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s younger brother, responded to the DOJ’s announcement that it is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell by doubling down on his longtime suspicion that his brother’s official death was a homicide, not a suicide. He criticized the Department’s video release and other materials as misleading or incomplete, stating that they omit crucial evidence—for example, he disputes that the footage even shows Epstein’s actual cell, saying “that video is bullshit.” Mark also reiterated his belief that government agencies are withholding details, insisting that “they’re holding things back” and that meaningful transparency remains absent.Despite the DOJ’s shift toward engaging Maxwell—which it says may be key to identifying additional perpetrators—Mark remains doubtful that any forthcoming testimony or disclosures will address the core mysteries: who orchestrated his brother’s death and whether the full scope of Epstein’s network will ever be revealed. As Maxwell and her legal team negotiate the terms of her cooperation, Mark continues to call for a full reopening of the investigation into Jeffrey’s death and broader transparency around Epstein-related evidence.to contact me:Jeffrey Epstein's brother claims the true motive behind Trump's DOJ meeting Ghislaine Maxwell is nothing to do with 'what she knows' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Jul 14min

Bryan Kohberger is expected to be formally sentenced today in Boise, Idaho, to four consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole, plus an additional decade for burglary, after pleading guilty to the November 13, 2022, murders of four University of Idaho students. The death penalty was removed through his plea deal, and he has waived his right to appeal. While the sentencing itself is largely procedural given the agreement, the hearing represents the first time the surviving victims' families and roommates may address him directly, read impact statements, and share the emotional aftermath of the tragedy.A pivotal moment to watch is whether Kohberger chooses to exercise his right of allocution — that is, whether he will speak to the court. Though legally allowed to do so, he is under no obligation, and experts believe there's a low likelihood he'll offer any explanation or expression of remorse. Many families, public figures (including former President Trump), and the broader community are pressing for answers about motive and intent — questions that remain largely unanswered. Following the hearing, the judge may unseal additional documents, and Kohberger will likely be transferred to a maximum-security facility to serve out his life sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Jul 13min