How the DOJ Defended the Indefensible: Inside Marie Villafaña’s Epstein CVRA Claim (Part 3) (12/11/25)

How the DOJ Defended the Indefensible: Inside Marie Villafaña’s Epstein CVRA Claim (Part 3) (12/11/25)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Former Prince Andrew And His Crude And Rude Behavior  Towards Staff

Former Prince Andrew And His Crude And Rude Behavior Towards Staff

Prince Andrew has long carried a reputation among former palace staff as arrogant, dismissive, and routinely rude, a pattern that multiple aides and insiders have described as ingrained rather than ep...

28 Jan 12min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 5) (1/28/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 5) (1/28/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

28 Jan 15min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 4) (1/27/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 4) (1/27/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

28 Jan 14min

Believe Washington, Not Your Eyes: Epstein and the Rise of Orwellian Federal Power  (1/28/26)

Believe Washington, Not Your Eyes: Epstein and the Rise of Orwellian Federal Power (1/28/26)

The Epstein affair is not merely a scandal of crime and privilege, but a masterclass in Orwellian control, where institutions demand obedience not to law, but to narrative. Cameras fail at the precise...

28 Jan 18min

Is TikTok Censoring Jeffrey Epstein  Related  Content?   (1/28/26)

Is TikTok Censoring Jeffrey Epstein Related Content? (1/28/26)

Recent reports in U.S. media and on social platforms surfaced in late January 2026 alleging that TikTok users were experiencing censorship related to the name “Epstein” and other politically sensitive...

28 Jan 11min

That  Time Prince Andrew Missed His Daughters Birthday To Hang Out With Epstein (1/28/26)

That Time Prince Andrew Missed His Daughters Birthday To Hang Out With Epstein (1/28/26)

Prince Andrew’s decision to skip his own daughter Princess Eugenie’s eleventh birthday in order to remain with Jeffrey Epstein stands as one of the clearest illustrations of how distorted his prioriti...

28 Jan 12min

Mega Edition:  The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 21-24) (1/28/26)

Mega Edition: The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 21-24) (1/28/26)

In this segment we’re going back to the Office of Inspector General’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn’t exist when most people ...

28 Jan 51min

Mega Edition:  The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 17-20) (1/28/26)

Mega Edition: The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 17-20) (1/28/26)

In this segment we’re going back to the Office of Inspector General’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn’t exist when most people ...

28 Jan 53min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

p3-krim
rss-krimstad
svenska-fall
rss-viva-fotboll
flashback-forever
motiv
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-sanning-konsekvens
aftonbladet-krim
rss-krimreportrarna
olyckan-inifran
rss-frandfors-horna
fordomspodden
dagens-eko
spar
rss-flodet
blenda-2
politiken
rss-klubbland-en-podd-mest-om-frolunda