The Investigation Into Bryan Kohberger At The One Month Mark
From the archives: 1-30-23It has been a month since Bryan Kohberger, the man the authorities allege killed Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee was arrested in Pennsylvania. In that month, we have learned more about Bryan Kohberger and who he is from former friends, classmates and current colleagues. So, what have we learned thus far?In this episode, we take a look at the man suspected of these murders and what we know about Bryan Kohberger thirty days after his arrest.(commercial at 9:36)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho Murder Suspect: What We Know About Bryan Kohberger (people.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
16 Dec 14min
Ethan Chapin's Parent's Discuss Their Memories Of Their Son
The parents of Ethan Chapin sat down for an interview recently where they discussed how they are honoring Ethan and how things have been going for them since that horrible morning last November.In this episode, we hear how the Chapin's have been navigating their new normal and what their plans are for the upcoming trial of the man that the state of Idaho says killed their son.(commercial at 8:32)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Parents of Ethan Chapin talk grief, new book honoring his memory | king5.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
16 Dec 12min
Bryan Kohberger Says He Is Eager To Be Exonerated
From the archives: 1-1-23On this edition of the morning update, we dive right back into the headlines that we might have missed from overnight and see where things currently stand in the investigation into the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee.(commercial at 6:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho student murders - update: ‘Bright and awkward’ suspect Bryan Kohberger ‘eager to be exonerated,’ public defender says | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
16 Dec 12min
Bryan Kohberger Onboards Another Lawyer
As the trial of Bryan Kohberger inches closer there has been all sorts of movement going on behind th the scenes and one of the biggest moves to happen recently was the news that Kohberger was adding another lawyer to his team.In this episode, we take a look at his new lawyer and what she might be bringing to the the team.(commercial at 7:24)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger hires one of the 'best defense lawyers in the state' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Dec 11min
Clayton Howard Turns Up The Pressure On Cassie And Diddy In His Amended Complaint (Part 2) (12/15/25)
The Second Amended Complaint filed by Clayton Howard in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California lays out a sweeping civil case against Sean Combs, Cassandra Ventura, Bad Boy Records, Combs Enterprises, and the Beverly Hills Hotel Corporation. Howard alleges a pattern of abuse, coercion, intimidation, and exploitation tied to Combs’ business empire, asserting that the defendants either directly participated in or knowingly enabled unlawful conduct. The complaint expands on earlier filings by adding detail, refining claims, and asserting that the alleged misconduct was not isolated but systemic, facilitated through corporate structures, private residences, hotels, and entertainment-industry power dynamics. Howard demands a jury trial and seeks damages, framing the case as one rooted in abuse of power, retaliation, and institutional complicity.The amended filing also emphasizes the role of corporate defendants and venues, particularly the Beverly Hills Hotel, arguing that they failed in their duty to protect individuals from foreseeable harm and instead allowed their premises to be used in furtherance of alleged misconduct. By naming both individuals and corporate entities, the complaint aims to pierce the separation between Combs’ personal actions and his business operations, asserting joint liability across the enterprise. The Second Amended Complaint positions the case not merely as a dispute between private parties, but as a broader reckoning with how celebrity, money, and corporate shielding can be used to suppress accountability, with Howard seeking both financial relief and public adjudication of the claims before a jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Second Amended Complaint Howard v Combs Ventura.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Dec 10min
Clayton Howard Turns Up The Pressure On Cassie And Diddy In His Amended Complaint (Part 1) (12/15/25)
The Second Amended Complaint filed by Clayton Howard in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California lays out a sweeping civil case against Sean Combs, Cassandra Ventura, Bad Boy Records, Combs Enterprises, and the Beverly Hills Hotel Corporation. Howard alleges a pattern of abuse, coercion, intimidation, and exploitation tied to Combs’ business empire, asserting that the defendants either directly participated in or knowingly enabled unlawful conduct. The complaint expands on earlier filings by adding detail, refining claims, and asserting that the alleged misconduct was not isolated but systemic, facilitated through corporate structures, private residences, hotels, and entertainment-industry power dynamics. Howard demands a jury trial and seeks damages, framing the case as one rooted in abuse of power, retaliation, and institutional complicity.The amended filing also emphasizes the role of corporate defendants and venues, particularly the Beverly Hills Hotel, arguing that they failed in their duty to protect individuals from foreseeable harm and instead allowed their premises to be used in furtherance of alleged misconduct. By naming both individuals and corporate entities, the complaint aims to pierce the separation between Combs’ personal actions and his business operations, asserting joint liability across the enterprise. The Second Amended Complaint positions the case not merely as a dispute between private parties, but as a broader reckoning with how celebrity, money, and corporate shielding can be used to suppress accountability, with Howard seeking both financial relief and public adjudication of the claims before a jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Second Amended Complaint Howard v Combs Ventura.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Dec 12min
Judge Marra’s Epstein Opinion and the CVRA Wall (Part 2) (12/15/25)
The court’s Opinion and Order addresses a petition brought by Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), challenging the federal government’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement in Florida. The petitioners argued that federal prosecutors violated their rights by negotiating and finalizing the deal without notifying them, depriving them of the opportunity to be heard and to confer with the government. The court acknowledged the gravity of the allegations and the disturbing nature of the underlying conduct but focused its analysis on jurisdiction, statutory limits, and the scope of relief available under the CVRA.Ultimately, the court denied the requested relief, concluding that the CVRA did not provide a basis to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement or to grant the remedies sought against the United States. The order emphasized that the CVRA’s enforcement mechanisms are narrow, do not waive sovereign immunity for damages, and do not authorize courts to unwind completed prosecutorial decisions. While recognizing the petitioners’ claims of exclusion and harm, the court held that it lacked authority under the statute to grant retrospective relief that would nullify the agreement, leaving the petitioners without a judicial remedy in that proceeding despite the acknowledged concerns about how the case was handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.478.0_9.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Dec 12min
Judge Marra’s Epstein Opinion and the CVRA Wall (Part 1) (12/15/25)
The court’s Opinion and Order addresses a petition brought by Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), challenging the federal government’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement in Florida. The petitioners argued that federal prosecutors violated their rights by negotiating and finalizing the deal without notifying them, depriving them of the opportunity to be heard and to confer with the government. The court acknowledged the gravity of the allegations and the disturbing nature of the underlying conduct but focused its analysis on jurisdiction, statutory limits, and the scope of relief available under the CVRA.Ultimately, the court denied the requested relief, concluding that the CVRA did not provide a basis to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement or to grant the remedies sought against the United States. The order emphasized that the CVRA’s enforcement mechanisms are narrow, do not waive sovereign immunity for damages, and do not authorize courts to unwind completed prosecutorial decisions. While recognizing the petitioners’ claims of exclusion and harm, the court held that it lacked authority under the statute to grant retrospective relief that would nullify the agreement, leaving the petitioners without a judicial remedy in that proceeding despite the acknowledged concerns about how the case was handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.478.0_9.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Dec 12min
