Sixteen Epstein Files Removed as DOJ Faces Transparency Backlash  (12/21/25)

Sixteen Epstein Files Removed as DOJ Faces Transparency Backlash (12/21/25)

The U.S. Department of Justice has come under fire after releasing thousands of pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, only to include extensive redactions that critics say undermine the law’s intent. Lawmakers and advocates argue the heavily blacked-out material—some pages entirely obscured and many more with large sections removed—fails to meet the statutory requirement for transparency. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the redactions, saying they were legally necessary to protect victims’ identities and sensitive information, but opponents counter that the lack of clear explanations for the edits fuels suspicion and diminishes public trust in the process. The Hill noted that even innocuous or puzzling redactions (such as non-substantive content) have drawn ire and raised questions about whether the DOJ is fully complying with the law.

The controversy intensified as some documents initially published on the Justice Department’s website were removed without explanation just days after release, including files that appeared to contain a photograph featuring a former U.S. president alongside Epstein. Critics from both parties, including co-sponsors of the transparency legislation, accused the department of a “bare minimum” rollout that falls short of Congress’s mandate, and threatened further oversight or legal action to enforce compliance. DOJ officials maintain they are continuing to review and release additional materials on a rolling basis, but the dispute highlights ongoing tensions over how much of Epstein’s records should be public and how to balance survivor privacy with demands for accountability.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

16 Epstein files, including photo of Donald Trump, disappear from DOJ website: Report

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:  Is The Epstein Investigation Genuine Or Another Attempt To Bury The Truth? (2/7/26)

Mega Edition: Is The Epstein Investigation Genuine Or Another Attempt To Bury The Truth? (2/7/26)

The controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investiga...

7 Feb 1h 5min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 10-11) (2/7/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 10-11) (2/7/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 23min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 18min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 13min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 13min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
motiv
rss-krimstad
p3-krim
fordomspodden
flashback-forever
rss-viva-fotboll
spar
svenska-fall
aftonbladet-daily
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
olyckan-inifran
grans
rss-aftonbladet-krim
rss-frandfors-horna
dagens-eko
rss-krimreportrarna
svd-ledarredaktionen