Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Related Congressional Deposition (Part 13-15) (2/2/26)

Mega Edition: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Related Congressional Deposition (Part 13-15) (2/2/26)

When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn’t justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.

Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Bank of America Settles Epstein Victim Lawsuit for $72.5 Million (3/30/26)

Bank of America Settles Epstein Victim Lawsuit for $72.5 Million (3/30/26)

Bank of America agreed to pay approximately $72.5 million to settle a civil lawsuit brought by women who accused the bank of playing a role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. The...

30 Mars 14min

Inside the Epstein Files: Modeling Agent’s Disturbing Outreach to Jeffrey Epstein (3/30/26)

Inside the Epstein Files: Modeling Agent’s Disturbing Outreach to Jeffrey Epstein (3/30/26)

The communications in question center on a modeling agent who maintained a long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, during which he repeatedly attempted to introduce young women to him under th...

30 Mars 11min

Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Responds To Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Part 1-2) (3/30/26)

Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Responds To Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Part 1-2) (3/30/26)

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's a...

30 Mars 25min

Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 4-5) (3/30/26)

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 4-5) (3/30/26)

In the defamation lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as part of her motion for summary judgment. This statement aimed to establi...

30 Mars 31min

Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 1-3) (3/29/26)

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 1-3) (3/29/26)

In the defamation lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as part of her motion for summary judgment. This statement aimed to establi...

30 Mars 40min

Tea, Titles, and Trafficking: Prince Andrew’s Cozy Correspondence With Jeffrey Epstein

Tea, Titles, and Trafficking: Prince Andrew’s Cozy Correspondence With Jeffrey Epstein

Prince Andrew has become the walking definition of hypocrisy — a royal parasite sitting comfortably in Royal Lodge while pretending “no one is above the law.” The newly unearthed emails to Jeffrey Eps...

30 Mars 13min

No Title, No Honor, No Dignity:   Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 3)

No Title, No Honor, No Dignity: Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 3)

Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prer...

30 Mars 13min

No Title, No Honor, No Dignity:   Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 2)

No Title, No Honor, No Dignity: Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 2)

Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prer...

30 Mars 16min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
svenska-fall
p3-krim
flashback-forever
rss-krimstad
rss-sanning-konsekvens
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
motiv
spar
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-flodet
politiken
olyckan-inifran
rss-frandfors-horna
svd-ledarredaktionen
dagens-eko
blenda-2
grans
rss-aftonbladet-krim