Mega Edition:  How The Queen's Lifelong Enabling Of Andrew Led To Complete Disgrace (2/6/26)

Mega Edition: How The Queen's Lifelong Enabling Of Andrew Led To Complete Disgrace (2/6/26)

For years, Queen Elizabeth II chose preservation of the Crown over accountability, and nowhere was that failure clearer than in her handling of Prince Andrew and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Andrew continued to enjoy royal protection, status, and access, with no meaningful intervention from the monarch who ultimately controlled the institution’s response. The Queen allowed Andrew to remain a working royal for years after Epstein’s crimes were public knowledge, signaling that proximity to power outweighed the gravity of trafficking allegations. Even as public scrutiny intensified, the Palace defaulted to silence, denial, and delay, a pattern that insulated Andrew rather than confronting the moral rot of his associations. This was not ignorance; it was willful avoidance, a deliberate decision to treat Epstein as an embarrassment to be managed instead of a warning demanding decisive action. By prioritizing stability optics over ethical leadership, the Queen enabled a culture in which Andrew faced no immediate consequences.

That failure reached its nadir after Andrew’s disastrous 2019 interview, when the Palace response was reactive and begrudging, not principled. Only after overwhelming backlash did the Queen strip Andrew of military titles and patronages, and even then, the measures felt calculated to quiet outrage rather than acknowledge wrongdoing or institutional complicity. There was no transparent reckoning, no apology to survivors, and no clear admission that the monarchy had protected one of its own at the expense of justice. The Queen’s refusal to act sooner sent a message that royal blood conferred immunity from scrutiny, reinforcing a hierarchy where victims’ voices mattered less than preserving the façade of dignity. History will not remember this as quiet restraint; it will remember it as abdication. In shielding Andrew for as long as she did, Queen Elizabeth II didn’t merely overlook his Epstein ties—she normalized the idea that power excuses proximity to predation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 18min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 13min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 13min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

6 Feb 12min

Epstein Files Unsealed:  Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 2) (2/6/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 2) (2/6/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge...

6 Feb 17min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
motiv
rss-krimstad
p3-krim
fordomspodden
flashback-forever
rss-viva-fotboll
spar
svenska-fall
aftonbladet-daily
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
olyckan-inifran
grans
rss-aftonbladet-krim
rss-frandfors-horna
dagens-eko
rss-krimreportrarna
svd-ledarredaktionen