Epstein Files Unsealed:  Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 2) (2/6/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 2) (2/6/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell’s deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz’s defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors’ allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein’s secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.


The deposition also addresses Dershowitz’s accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz’s narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.




to contact me:

EFTA00594390.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:  Is The Epstein Investigation Genuine Or Another Attempt To Bury The Truth? (2/7/26)

Mega Edition: Is The Epstein Investigation Genuine Or Another Attempt To Bury The Truth? (2/7/26)

The controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investiga...

7 Feb 1h 5min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 10-11) (2/7/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 10-11) (2/7/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 23min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Feb 33min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 18min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 13min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Feb 13min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
motiv
rss-krimstad
p3-krim
fordomspodden
flashback-forever
rss-viva-fotboll
spar
svenska-fall
aftonbladet-daily
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
olyckan-inifran
grans
rss-aftonbladet-krim
rss-frandfors-horna
dagens-eko
rss-krimreportrarna
svd-ledarredaktionen