Epstein Files Unsealed:  Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 9) (2/13/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 9) (2/13/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell’s deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz’s defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors’ allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein’s secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.


The deposition also addresses Dershowitz’s accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz’s narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.




to contact me:

EFTA00594390.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:   Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 1-3)  (4/19/26)

Mega Edition: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 1-3) (4/19/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge...

20 Apr 43min

Mike Johnson Slips: Did He Admit That Epstein Was an Intelligence Tool?

Mike Johnson Slips: Did He Admit That Epstein Was an Intelligence Tool?

In his recent remarks about the Jeffrey Epstein files, Mike Johnson shifted from publicly demanding transparency to cautioning that the disclosure could “publicly reveal the identity … of undercover l...

20 Apr 11min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

20 Apr 13min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

19 Apr 12min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

19 Apr 13min

Inside The OIG Interview:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 18) (4/19/26)

Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 18) (4/19/26)

Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to i...

19 Apr 11min

Inside The OIG Interview:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 17) (4/19/26)

Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 17) (4/19/26)

Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to i...

19 Apr 13min

Inside The OIG Interview:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 16) (4/19/26)

Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 16) (4/19/26)

Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to i...

19 Apr 12min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
svenska-fall
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
blenda-2
flashback-forever
politiken
rss-sanning-konsekvens
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
motiv
grans
rss-krimreportrarna
spar
svd-ledarredaktionen
dagens-eko
rss-frandfors-horna
rss-flodet
olyckan-inifran
rss-klubbland-en-podd-mest-om-frolunda