Mega Edition:   Inside the Roles of Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn

Mega Edition: Inside the Roles of Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein’s world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein’s longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.

After Epstein’s death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein’s long-running operation possible.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:   Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal"  According To  The DOJ (2/16/26)

Mega Edition: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" According To The DOJ (2/16/26)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

16 Feb 38min

Spencer Kuvin Calls  On Bill Gates To Speak With Authorities About Jeffrey Epstein

Spencer Kuvin Calls On Bill Gates To Speak With Authorities About Jeffrey Epstein

Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing multiple survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, publicly criticized Bill Gates for continuing to meet with Epstein even after the financier’s conviction. Speaking to The...

16 Feb 19min

Jeffrey Epstein And His Great Pal Charlie Rose

Jeffrey Epstein And His Great Pal Charlie Rose

Charlie Rose’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein surfaced through reports that Epstein actively referred young women to Rose’s office, pitching them as “perfect assistants.” Phone logs reportedly showed Epstein...

16 Feb 13min

Eileen Guggenheim And The Allegations She Was A Conduit To Epstein

Eileen Guggenheim And The Allegations She Was A Conduit To Epstein

The article reports that Eileen Guggenheim, a former aide to then-Prince Charles and now president of the New York Academy of Art, has been accused i of introducing a studen, Maria  Farmer, to Jeffrey...

16 Feb 10min

How The State Of New York Failed To Stop Jeffrey Epstein's Predatory Behavior

How The State Of New York Failed To Stop Jeffrey Epstein's Predatory Behavior

Manhattan prosecutors in New York played a troubling role in allowing Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse to continue largely uninterrupted. As journalist Jane Coaston detailed, a Manhattan assistant distr...

15 Feb 18min

The Operational Spine: How the DOJ’s Final Epstein “List” Avoids the Infrastructure (2/15/26)

The Operational Spine: How the DOJ’s Final Epstein “List” Avoids the Infrastructure (2/15/26)

The DOJ’s so-called “list” is being framed as transparency, but it reads like controlled optics rather than a serious accounting of Jeffrey Epstein’s network. A genuine disclosure would distinguish be...

15 Feb 15min

The Legal Basis for Redactions: DOJ Explains Its Epstein File Edits In A Letter To Congress (2/16/26)

The Legal Basis for Redactions: DOJ Explains Its Epstein File Edits In A Letter To Congress (2/16/26)

The letter outlines the Department of Justice’s obligations under Section 3 of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates that within 15 days of completing its required document release, the D...

15 Feb 15min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
motiv
blenda-2
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
fordomspodden
flashback-forever
rss-viva-fotboll
rss-sanning-konsekvens
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
svenska-fall
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
spar
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-flodet
olyckan-inifran
rss-frandfors-horna
grans
dagens-eko