Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma 2020 INSC 487
Nyay Samachar19 Aug 2025

Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma 2020 INSC 487

Discover the landmark Supreme Court judgment on the interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. This historic ruling brings clarity on daughters' rights as coparceners in Hindu Mitakshara joint family property, affirming their equal entitlement with sons by birth, irrespective of whether the father or other coparcener was alive on the amendment date.


This judgment marks a significant step towards gender equality in Hindu succession law and the empowerment of daughters in ancestral property rights.

#coparcenaryrights #daughtersrights #jointfamilyproperty

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(149)

Zainul vs. State of Bihar 2025 INSC 1192

Zainul vs. State of Bihar 2025 INSC 1192

What happens when the conviction of a large group is based on vague and inconsistent evidence in a land dispute turned violent? The Supreme Court revisits constructive liability under Section 149 IPC,...

30 Okt 20255min

Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi & ors. vs. Syeda Arifa Parveen 2025 INSC 1187

Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi & ors. vs. Syeda Arifa Parveen 2025 INSC 1187

Can an oral gift (Hiba) of immovable property, claimed decades later, stand its ground against consistent documentary evidence of possession and the bar of limitation?Key Takeaways:✅ Supreme Court cla...

30 Okt 20256min

Nilesh Baburao Gitte. vs. State of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 1191

Nilesh Baburao Gitte. vs. State of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 1191

In this judgement, the Apex Court revisits the crucial principles of circumstantial evidence in criminal law. This verdict underscores the necessity of a complete and unquestionable chain of evidence ...

30 Okt 20255min

Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttaranchal Etc. 2025 INSC 1193

Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttaranchal Etc. 2025 INSC 1193

In this case, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court’s conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder, reinstating the Trial Court’s acquittal. Central to the judgment was the assessment of eyewitne...

30 Okt 20256min

K.S. Shivappa vs. Smt. K. Neelamma 2025 INSC 1195

K.S. Shivappa vs. Smt. K. Neelamma 2025 INSC 1195

MINORS CAN REPUDIATE GUARDIAN CONDUCTED PROPERTY SALES, EVEN WITHOUT FILING A SUIT. If a minor, upon attaining majority, resells or otherwise demonstrates repudiation within the time limit, the prior ...

30 Okt 20255min

S . Santhana Lakshmi & Ors. vs. D. Rajammal 2025 INSC 1197 -

S . Santhana Lakshmi & Ors. vs. D. Rajammal 2025 INSC 1197 -

What happens when a suit seeks only an injunction without asking for a declaration of title—especially amidst disputed ownership and admitted lack of possession? The Court holds that when possession a...

30 Okt 20256min

Swacch Association, Nagpur vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2025 INSC 1199

Swacch Association, Nagpur vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2025 INSC 1199

The Supreme Court has delivered a significant ruling regarding the status of Nagpur's iconic Futala Lake. The Court concluded that Futala Lake is a man-made waterbody, not a statutory wetland under re...

30 Okt 20255min

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Dr. Kamala Selvaraj 2025 INSC 1200

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Dr. Kamala Selvaraj 2025 INSC 1200

Imagine undertaking the project of a lifetime—building a state-of-the-art hospital—only to be blindsided by an unexpected, multi-crore fee from a government authority. This is the exact scenario that ...

30 Okt 20255min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
svenska-fall
tv4-nyheterna-story
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
motiv
de-fyras-gang
aftonbladet-daily
flashback-forever
spar
rss-expressen-dok
rss-sanning-konsekvens
politiken
rss-vad-fan-hande
krimmagasinet
rss-krimreportrarna
kungligt
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
olyckan-inifran
rss-flodet