Mega Edition:   Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 10-13)  (4/19/26)

Mega Edition: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 10-13) (4/19/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell’s deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz’s defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors’ allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein’s secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.


The deposition also addresses Dershowitz’s accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz’s narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.




to contact me:

EFTA00594390.pdf

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:   Zorro Ranch Hit's The Market Before Selling For A Reduced Price (7/6/26)

Mega Edition: Zorro Ranch Hit's The Market Before Selling For A Reduced Price (7/6/26)

Zorro Ranch, Jeffrey Epstein’s sprawling New Mexico property, hit the market in 2021 after years of being tied to allegations of abuse, trafficking, secrecy, and unanswered questions. The estate first...

7 Juli 51min

Mega Edition:  The Legacy Media Ignored The Epstein Story For Years.  What Changed? (7/6/26)

Mega Edition: The Legacy Media Ignored The Epstein Story For Years. What Changed? (7/6/26)

For decades, much of the legacy media treated Jeffrey Epstein’s world with a caution that often functioned like protection for the powerful people around him. The allegations against Epstein were not ...

7 Juli 52min

Mega Edition: Zorro Ranch, The Management Team And The Unanswered Questions (7/6/26)

Mega Edition: Zorro Ranch, The Management Team And The Unanswered Questions (7/6/26)

Zorro Ranch remains one of the most unresolved locations in the Jeffrey Epstein story because it was not just a vacation property; it was a remote, controlled environment where Epstein could operate w...

7 Juli 41min

How Epstein’s Operation Required a Network the DOJ Won’t Confront

How Epstein’s Operation Required a Network the DOJ Won’t Confront

The Department of Justice’s long-standing claim that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell acted alone is contradicted by the government’s own records. Federal prosecutors explicitly acknowledged the ...

7 Juli 13min

Is TikTok Censoring Jeffrey Epstein  Related  Content?

Is TikTok Censoring Jeffrey Epstein Related Content?

Recent reports in U.S. media and on social platforms surfaced in late January 2026 alleging that TikTok users were experiencing censorship related to the name “Epstein” and other politically sensitive...

7 Juli 11min

Lawyers For Epstein Survivors Seek Judicial Intervention Due To Redaction Issues

Lawyers For Epstein Survivors Seek Judicial Intervention Due To Redaction Issues

The letter urges immediate judicial intervention by Judges Berman and Engelmayer after what the authors describe as a serious failure by the Department of Justice in releasing Epstein-related records....

6 Juli 14min

Maria Farmer Was Right: The FBI Knew About Jeffrey Epstein in 1996

Maria Farmer Was Right: The FBI Knew About Jeffrey Epstein in 1996

The recent Epstein files dump has finally produced documentary confirmation of what Maria Farmer has said for decades: in 1996, she formally warned the Federal Bureau of Investigation about Jeffrey Ep...

6 Juli 14min

Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 11) (7/6/26)

Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 11) (7/6/26)

Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coo...

6 Juli 15min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

svenska-fall
aftonbladet-krim
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
tv4-nyheterna-story
aftonbladet-daily
flashback-forever
motiv
de-fyras-gang
spar
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-expressen-dok
rss-flodet
rss-vad-fan-hande
politiken
rss-frandfors-horna
kungligt
rss-aftonbladet-krim
krimmagasinet