Traffic School - Grave Robbing, Guillotines And Inflatable Anime Women - 08/28/2026

This episode of Traffic School begins with what sounds less like a legitimate radio program and more like two men standing outside a post office trying to resurrect the concept of 19th-century bounty hunting. Wanted posters come up almost immediately, along with the horrifying realization that Speaker 1 apparently considers himself an “outstanding young man,” despite the conversation rapidly turning toward suspicious behavior, mysterious electricity usage, heat sensors, and a house glowing so brightly that the government apparently needs to be informed. The conversation then takes a hard left into neighborhood fire trucks, elderly neighbors, Arizona vacations, and an absolutely bizarre story that is teased but never fully revealed because apparently even Traffic School has standards somewhere deep beneath the basement floor. Then, suddenly, it is time for actual law questions.

The first major legal crisis involves a supposed dine-and-dash, except the alleged criminal mastermind insists he actually paid. During a birthday dinner for Peaches, the restaurant payment system apparently displayed multiple tickets, the correct bill was selected, the payment was processed, the waitress confirmed everything was fine, and everyone left. Later, however, the crew discovered that another group had apparently departed without paying, while a friend had paid the original bill. The payment itself initially showed as pending, creating a spectacular bureaucratic nightmare in which one person had apparently paid, another person had apparently paid, and everyone was now wondering who had technically stolen dinner from whom. The discussion spirals into whether dine-and-dash can become theft, whether intentionally entering a business with the plan to steal food could constitute burglary, and whether eating more than $1,000 worth of food would transform the situation into grand theft. The answer, delivered with the confidence of a man who has already been accused of crimes he didn't commit, is essentially: Carl, stop committing felonies.

The episode then produces an incredible flashback involving Pizza Hut and a police captain who generously offered to buy pizza for everyone after a day at the gun range. The captain paid for his own meal and the lieutenant's, then apparently vanished into the sunset while everyone else assumed the bill had been handled. The waitress eventually stopped the remaining group and revealed the horrifying truth: the captain had not actually paid for everybody. He had merely paid for himself and one other person, leaving the sergeant to discover that he had accidentally inherited an entire restaurant bill. It becomes a masterclass in the ancient law-enforcement technique of saying, “The other guy said he was paying.”

Then comes an actual public-service announcement: school is back in session. Drivers are urged to watch the yellow flashing lights because ignoring them may result in the sudden appearance of red and blue flashing lights. The hosts discuss people flying down Alameda Road, children riding bikes and skateboards, kids on electric scooters, and the general nightmare of trying to navigate roads while children are simultaneously excited about returning to school and apparently operating under the assumption that traffic laws are more of a suggestion. The conversation emphasizes defensive driving, paying attention, adding time to your commute, and remembering that Idaho is still in the “100 deadliest days of driving.”

Then the show returns to the crucial matter of parking your car facing the wrong direction. Apparently this is generally governed by city ordinance, leading to a story about Burley enforcing the rule with enough enthusiasm to become a recurring character in the episode. Speaker 1 recalls parking backward in front of his own house, only to have an officer come to his door and inform him that his vehicle was illegally positioned. Unfortunately, the story gets worse because the car also contained a garbage bag full of beer cans from band practice. Although the beer cans were apparently leftovers from the previous night and the driver wasn't intoxicated when confronted, the visual of a police officer approaching a car parked illegally backward in front of a house containing a suspicious bag of beer cans is objectively spectacular. Somehow, he received only a warning.

That leads into the bizarre discussion of seat-belt enforcement, including the claim that a seat belt violation is generally a secondary offense but that Burley apparently operates according to its own mysterious gravitational field. The hosts joke about officers finding additional reasons to initiate a traffic stop, including broken taillights and speeding. A story about an 80-mph freeway on-ramp then gets dragged into the conversation, with the horrifying realization that admitting “I'm used to getting on the freeway at 80” may not be the optimal strategy when speaking to law enforcement. The segment eventually clarifies the distinction between primary and secondary offenses and whether passengers or drivers can be cited when children aren't properly buckled.

And then everything gets weird.

The hosts suddenly ask whether guillotines are legal to possess. Nobody seems entirely certain, but the working theory is essentially that owning one may be legal while using it is where the problems begin. This leads directly into a story about a man who allegedly drove from California to Washington, D.C. with a gigantic guillotine mounted on the back of a flatbed truck. The group becomes increasingly fascinated by the logistical nightmare of transporting a giant head-chopping apparatus across the entire country without being stopped, especially because the guillotine apparently towers over the truck and might have presented a potential height violation. The conclusion is that even if the authorities weren't concerned about the historical implications of the device, somebody should probably have noticed the enormous guillotine sticking into the sky.

The episode then receives a call from Deborah, who asks whether it is legal to have a hangman's noose hanging from the ceiling of your house. This question somehow leads to the revelation that Deborah owns multiple coffins built by her deceased husband, keeps swords and axes around the house, used to have a guillotine in her living room, got married on Halloween inside a funeral home while everyone was dressed in black, and apparently considers this all perfectly normal. The hosts attempt to process the fact that this is a real person's actual home while Deborah calmly explains that she and her husband simply loved Halloween. The conversation eventually becomes an accidental architectural tour of what may be the most intimidating house in Pocatello.

That naturally leads to human remains. Another caller asks about transporting a casket or skeleton in a privately owned vehicle. The discussion distinguishes between decorative or 3D-printed skeletons and actual human remains, before the hosts discuss Idaho's law concerning human remains taken from graves or burial sites. Lieutenant Crane explains that, as of July 1, Idaho made it a felony to own, sell, or lease human remains taken from a grave, and that advertising them for sale is prohibited as well. The discussion then somehow turns to Facebook Marketplace and the horrifying possibility that someone might actually be browsing local listings for human bones.

The skeleton conversation gets even darker when the hosts discuss excavators who have accidentally uncovered human remains in the region. In those cases, Idaho State University was reportedly brought in to help de...