Falling in Love: Do the 36 Questions Actually Work?

Falling in Love: Do the 36 Questions Actually Work?

Can a list of questions really make two strangers fall in love? In 2015, a viral New York Times Modern Love column claimed psychologists had discovered a formula for love: 36 increasingly personal questions, plus four minutes of eye contact. Millions of people tried it. There was even an app. But when we followed the citation trail back to the science, the story started to unravel. In this episode, we crack open the 1997 study behind the “36 Questions,” unearth a forgotten pilot study with a different (and sexier) protocol, and track down the real origin of the eye-gazing task. Along the way, we break down why control groups matter, why scale midpoints mislead, and why group averages aren’t people. We also try the questions on each other—purely for science, of course—and ask the nerdiest Valentine’s Day question of all: can a list of questions really make anyone fall in love?



Statistical topics

  • Control groups
  • Correlated observations
  • Group averages vs individual inference
  • Pilot studies
  • Reference distributions
  • Scale interpretation
  • Units of observation


Methodological morals

  • “Before you repeat a scientific claim, follow it back to the original study and read it carefully.”
  • “You can slice the data into subgroups all you want, but that doesn't magically give you a control group. It gives you meaningless results.”

Our version of the “40 Questions” app!

References



Kristin and Regina’s online courses:

Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding

Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis

Medical Statistics Certificate Program

Writing in the Sciences

Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program

Programs that we teach in:

Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program


Find us on:

Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/X

Regina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com


  • (00:00) - Intro
  • (04:42) - Viral NYT Modern Love essay’s cultural influence
  • (09:32) - Science behind the 36 questions
  • (15:07) - The 1997 paper myth busting
  • (18:52) - Sleuthing the pilot study
  • (29:44) - What did the 1997 paper actually show
  • (41:24) - Discussion section
  • (49:58) - Did it replicate
  • (56:47) - Wrap up


Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(45)

Statistical Sleuthing: Can you spot a problem?

Statistical Sleuthing: Can you spot a problem?

Can you spot problems in a scientific study just by reading the published paper? We put our statistical sleuthing skills to the test with a famous study on procrastination and deadlines that was retra...

5 Okt 1h 11min

Ctrl-Z Awards: Will retracting your paper ruin your career?

Ctrl-Z Awards: Will retracting your paper ruin your career?

What happens when you discover that your published paper is wrong? Does retracting it ruin your reputation—or could owning the mistake actually make things better? In this episode, we meet the inaugur...

21 Sep 1h 15min

Statistical Power: When is it useful?

Statistical Power: When is it useful?

Statistical power is one of the most important ideas in statistics—and one of the most misunderstood. In this episode, we explain what statistical power really means, why researchers need to think abo...

7 Sep 55min

Cannabis and Brain Aging: Can weed keep your brain young?

Cannabis and Brain Aging: Can weed keep your brain young?

Can weed protect your brain as you get older? We unpack a study linking lifetime cannabis use to larger brain volumes and better cognitive test scores in older adults—and investigate how those finding...

24 Aug 48min

Double Duty: Can the meningitis vaccine also protect against gonorrhea?

Double Duty: Can the meningitis vaccine also protect against gonorrhea?

Can the meningitis vaccine do double duty against gonorrhea? We examine a fascinating randomized trial inspired by years of encouraging observational studies—and what happened when those earlier resul...

10 Aug 40min

Hot Tubbing: Can soaking in hot water help you run faster?

Hot Tubbing: Can soaking in hot water help you run faster?

Can you improve your endurance by sitting in a hot tub instead of doing another hard workout? We dig into a study that put elite runners through five weeks of what we affectionately call “endurance ho...

27 Juli 44min

Exercise Snacks: Can just four minutes of exercise a day improve blood sugar?

Exercise Snacks: Can just four minutes of exercise a day improve blood sugar?

Could four one-minute bursts of exercise really improve blood sugar? We try “exercise snacks” ourselves before taking a close look at the clinical trial that inspired headlines. We explain why the stu...

13 Juli 47min

Cancer Blood Tests Part 2: The clinical trial

Cancer Blood Tests Part 2: The clinical trial

How do you decide whether a clinical trial “worked”? In Part 2 of our Galleri series, we examine the landmark randomized trial of a blood test designed to detect more than 50 cancers. We explore why d...

29 Juni 57min

Populärt inom Vetenskap

p3-dystopia
dumma-manniskor
allt-du-velat-veta
kapitalet-en-podd-om-ekonomi
angestpodden
rss-ai-med-jonas-benjamin
rss-ronden
rss-mottagningen
halsorevolutionen
medicinvetarna
det-morka-psyket
sexet
rss-vetenskapsradion-2
bildningspodden
rss-experimentet
rss-ufobortom-rimligt-tvivel
bildningskomplexet
rss-spraket
ufo-sverige
rss-vetenskapsradion