#82 – James Forman Jr on reducing the cruelty of the US criminal legal system

#82 – James Forman Jr on reducing the cruelty of the US criminal legal system

No democracy has ever incarcerated as many people as the United States. To get its incarceration rate down to the global average, the US would have to release 3 in 4 people in its prisons today.

The effects on Black Americans have been especially severe — Black people make up 12% of the US population but 33% of its prison population. In the early 2000's when incarceration reached its peak, the US government estimated that 32% of Black boys would go to prison at some point in their lives, 5.5 times the figure for whites.

Contrary to popular understanding, nonviolent drug offenders make up less than a fifth of the incarcerated population. The only way to get its incarceration rate near the global average will be to shorten prison sentences for so-called 'violent criminals' — a politically toxic idea. But could we change that?

According to today’s guest, Professor James Forman Jr — a former public defender in Washington DC, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America, and now a professor at Yale Law School — there are two things we have to do to make that happen.

Links to learn more, summary and full transcript.

First, he thinks we should lose the term 'violent offender', and maybe even 'violent crime'. When you say 'violent crime', most people immediately think of murder and rape — but they're only a small fraction of the crimes that the law deems as violent.

In reality, the crime that puts the most people in prison in the US is robbery. And the law says that robbery is a violent crime whether a weapon is involved or not. By moving away from the catch-all category of 'violent criminals' we can judge the risk posed by individual people more sensibly.

Second, he thinks we should embrace the restorative justice movement. Instead of asking "What was the law? Who broke it? What should the punishment be", restorative justice asks "Who was harmed? Who harmed them? And what can we as a society, including the person who committed the harm, do to try to remedy that harm?"

Instead of being narrowly focused on how many years people should spend in prison as retribution, it starts a different conversation.

You might think this apparently softer approach would be unsatisfying to victims of crime. But James has discovered that a lot of victims of crime find that the current system doesn't help them in any meaningful way. What they primarily want to know is: why did this happen to me?

The best way to find that out is to actually talk to the person who harmed them, and in doing so gain a better understanding of the underlying factors behind the crime. The restorative justice approach facilitates these conversations in a way the current system doesn't allow, and can include restitution, apologies, and face-to-face reconciliation.

That’s just one topic of many covered in today’s episode, with much of the conversation focusing on Professor Forman’s 2018 book Locking Up Our Own — an examination of the historical roots of contemporary criminal justice practices in the US, and his experience setting up a charter school for at-risk youth in DC.

Chapters:

  • Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
  • The interview begins (00:02:02)
  • How did we get here? (00:04:07)
  • The role racism plays in policing today (00:14:47)
  • Black American views on policing and criminal justice (00:22:37)
  • Has the core argument of the book been controversial? (00:31:51)
  • The role that class divisions played in forming the current legal system (00:37:33)
  • What are the biggest problems today? (00:40:56)
  • What changes in policy would make the biggest difference? (00:52:41)
  • Shorter sentences for violent crimes (00:58:26)
  • Important recent successes (01:08:21)
  • What can people actually do to help? (01:14:38)


Get this episode by subscribing: type 80,000 Hours into your podcasting app. Or read the linked transcript.

Producer: Keiran Harris.
Audio mastering: Ben Cordell.
Transcriptions: Zakee Ulhaq.

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(359)

How to get into AI safety in 3 months (article reading by career advisor Matt Beard)

How to get into AI safety in 3 months (article reading by career advisor Matt Beard)

The AI safety field has grown by about 30x in the last eight years. Yet it is still in need of more people. Many want to help, but don’t know where to start. As an advisor at 80,000 Hours, Matt Beard ...

15 Okt 18min

OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is Now ‘Hell’ (AI Explained cross-post)

OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is Now ‘Hell’ (AI Explained cross-post)

This is an (unpaid) cross-post of a video from the podcast 'AI Explained', which Rob Wiblin thought you might be interested in.You can find the original on YouTube here. If you like it and want more s...

9 Okt 40min

In 2023 Ajeya Cotra already knew what was coming (classic episode)

In 2023 Ajeya Cotra already knew what was coming (classic episode)

We're rereleasing some of older episodes that seem more relevant than ever with new rogue AI incidents now seemingly announced every day. Ajeya was one of three independent investigators into the Hugg...

8 Okt 2h 46min

19 Astra and 'Hugging Face' details that reveal what's coming next | Rob Wiblin

19 Astra and 'Hugging Face' details that reveal what's coming next | Rob Wiblin

OpenAI’s rogue agent swarm was eventually caught hacking Hugging Face for a simple reason: it wasn’t trying to hide from us at all. What could a swarm that wants to stay hidden get away with?Host Rob ...

2 Okt 20min

The case for giving AI (some) legal rights | Simon Goldstein

The case for giving AI (some) legal rights | Simon Goldstein

It sounds like the worst idea in the world: pay AIs, let them own property, give them rights. But AI ethics and safety researcher Simon Goldstein thinks it might actually be the best way to keep human...

1 Okt 1h 53min

Will AI take power — or will humans use it to take power first? With Katja Grace and Tom Davidson

Will AI take power — or will humans use it to take power first? With Katja Grace and Tom Davidson

In our first-ever debate, we asked two leading AI risk researchers which catastrophe we should fear most: misaligned AI seizing control from humans, or a small group of humans using AI to seize power....

29 Sep 1h 28min

How we get from AI cyberattacks to human extinction

How we get from AI cyberattacks to human extinction

You’ve seen the headlines: AI could kill us all. Think it sounds ridiculous? So did host Luisa Rodriguez, until she tried to pick apart the arguments. She starts with the motive: why would AI ‘want’ t...

24 Sep 27min

#254 – Max Nadeau on why ambitious people should start AI safety nonprofits

#254 – Max Nadeau on why ambitious people should start AI safety nonprofits

There are millions available for anyone who can launch a successful nonprofit AI safety startup. The hard part, it turns out, is finding people to take the money. Coefficient Giving has drawn up a lis...

17 Sep 1h 3min

Populärt inom Utbildning

husmodern-med-amanda-schulman
rss-bara-en-till-om-beroende-medberoende
historiepodden-se
det-skaver
nu-blir-det-historia
rss-viktmedicinpodden
allt-du-velat-veta
harrisons-dramatiska-historia
not-fanny-anymore
rss-dr-bjorklund
roda-vita-rosen
johannes-hansen-podcast
sa-in-i-sjalen
rikatillsammans-om-privatekonomi-rikedom-i-livet
rss-ai-med-jonas-benjamin
rss-foraldramotet-bring-lagercrantz
i-vantan-pa-katastrofen
sektledare
rss-max-tant-med-max-villman
rss-basta-livet