#57: Cheatin on GDPR and Joost Case Corner

We have good news and bad news. Good news are, we are returning with Joost’s Case Corner, so expect lots of CJEU goodness from this episode. Bad news are, we get pretty distracted by other (equally important) topics before actually getting to the CJEU privacy cases… But don’t worry, whatever recent case law we didn’t cover in this episode, we’ll come back to in another episode in a few weeks!

Ok, so what do we discuss in this episode? We had to start with EDPB’s Pay or Consent Opinion, as that is the most exciting piece of news from last week. Related to that, we also dare to talk about the Advocate General’s Opinion in the C-446/21 Schrems v Facebook case - even though the AG Opinion was only published after we recorded the episode.

The CJEU cases we cover in this episode are:

• CJEU Belgian State – Data processed by an official journal [C-231/22]

• CJEU Gesamtverband Autoteile-Handel [C-319/22]

• CJEU FT – Copies of medical records [C-307/22]

• CJEU Ministerstvo zdravotnictví – COVID-19 mobile application [C-659/22]

• (Upcoming on 7 May 2024) - CJEU NADA and Others [C-115/22]

Did you enjoy our show? Support us by buying us a coffee here: https://bmc.link/privacypod4u

We would love to get feedback – so please tag us, follow us, DM us, or send us traditional email:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PodPrivacy, #privacypod

Instagram: @privacypod

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tietosuojapod/about/

Email: tietosuojapod@protonmail.com