Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Elucidations13 Juni 2022

Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence

This time around, Matt sits down with Rob Goodman to talk about political eloquence. Goodman is the author of a new book on this topic called Words on Fire, which you can pick up a copy of wherever you like to get books.


Can you think of the last time you saw someone give a rousing speech? They step up to the podium with throngs of onlookers staring at them. Somehow, rather than nervously scampering offstage or melting into a puddle, they speak off the cuff in a way that transfixes everyone listening. Their words feel fresh, sincere, and yet somehow also perfect, like a movie star nailing their big scene on the first take. You’d think that someone speaking from the heart would falter or stumble the way the rest of us do, but against all odds, this feels both maximally authentic and maximally polished.


What is it that makes a speaker compelling to listen to? Rob Goodman thinks that in order to understand what eloquence is, we need to look not just at the person up on stage and how they’re talking, but how the people in the audience are responding, and how the speaker is responding to their responses, and how they’re responding to the responses to their responses, and so on, ad infinitum. What makes eloquence happen isn’t really individual speakers talking in vacuum, so much as it is groups of people conversing together. Or at least that’s his idea. Eloquence isn’t just one person speaking skillfully; it’s several people conversing skillfully.


In this episode, our distinguished guest also argues that when a public speech goes well, it goes well because both the person speaking and the people listening are taking some risks. The person speaking is sort of on the spot, risking embarrassment, and the people listening might have to rethink their prior beliefs, which takes a lot of work, at least assuming they make an effort to live by their beliefs. When a speech does what it’s supposed to, these risks are shared between all parties, rather than farmed off onto just one. But when the speaker tries to give the appearance of taking risks without actually doing so, you end up with the audience shouldering 100% of the burden, and the exchange ends up somewhat dysfunctional. This, argues our guest, is what happens when politicians go to great lengths to control or sanitize the environment in which they speak, so that no matter what, they don’t embarrass themselves. Sort of like riding a roller coaster with a safety bar.


Tune in to hear more about what makes for a great speech!


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Avsnitt(153)

Episode 65: Julian Savulescu discusses doping in sports

Episode 65: Julian Savulescu discusses doping in sports

In this episode, Julian Savulescu argues that professional sports should change their regulations so as to allow for a certain amount of doping. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more informa...

17 Nov 201439min

Episode 64: James Conant and Jay Elliott discuss the analytic tradition

Episode 64: James Conant and Jay Elliott discuss the analytic tradition

In this episode, James Conant and Jay Elliott go into the history of the movement known as analytic philosophy. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

18 Okt 201452min

Episode 63: Michael Devitt discusses reference

Episode 63: Michael Devitt discusses reference

In this episode, Michael Devitt explains why we need a theory of what it means for a proper name to stand for a person or place. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

19 Sep 201438min

Episode 62: Sally Sedgwick discusses Hegel’s critique of Kant

Episode 62: Sally Sedgwick discusses Hegel’s critique of Kant

In this episode, Sally Sedgwick runs through Immanuel Kant’s idea that doing the right thing means doing whatever respects the dignity of all rational creatures, along with G. W. F. Hegel’s worry that...

21 Aug 201430min

Episode 61: Jeff Buechner discusses Kripke and functionalism

Episode 61: Jeff Buechner discusses Kripke and functionalism

In this episode, Jeff Buechner gives us an overview of the work of Saul Kripke, and explains his (not yet published) argument against the idea that the human mind is a kind of computer. Hosted on Acas...

16 Juli 201444min

Episode 60: Fabrizio Cariani shares some thoughts about oughts

Episode 60: Fabrizio Cariani shares some thoughts about oughts

In this episode, Fabrizio Cariani explains some of the challenges that arise when we try to precisely define the words 'ought' and 'should.' Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information...

23 Juni 201426min

Episode 59: Quill Kukla discusses reproductive risk

Episode 59: Quill Kukla discusses reproductive risk

In this episode, Quill Kukla questions the assumptions behind the idea that keeping unborn fetuses safe is simply a matter of individual mothers managing risk responsibly. Hosted on Acast. See acast.c...

14 Maj 201437min

Episode 58: Stewart Shapiro discusses vagueness, part II

Episode 58: Stewart Shapiro discusses vagueness, part II

In this episode, we return to the topic of vagueness from a new perspective. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

17 Apr 201427min

Populärt inom Samhälle & Kultur

en-mork-historia
podme-dokumentar
gynning-berg
p3-dokumentar
aftonbladet-krim
mardromsgasten
nemo-moter-en-van
skaringer-nessvold
badfluence
killradet
creepypodden-med-jack-werner
hor-har
spar
flashback-forever
kod-katastrof
vad-blir-det-for-mord
aftonbladet-daily
historiska-brott
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rattsfallen