Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Elucidations13 Juni 2022

Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence

This time around, Matt sits down with Rob Goodman to talk about political eloquence. Goodman is the author of a new book on this topic called Words on Fire, which you can pick up a copy of wherever you like to get books.


Can you think of the last time you saw someone give a rousing speech? They step up to the podium with throngs of onlookers staring at them. Somehow, rather than nervously scampering offstage or melting into a puddle, they speak off the cuff in a way that transfixes everyone listening. Their words feel fresh, sincere, and yet somehow also perfect, like a movie star nailing their big scene on the first take. You’d think that someone speaking from the heart would falter or stumble the way the rest of us do, but against all odds, this feels both maximally authentic and maximally polished.


What is it that makes a speaker compelling to listen to? Rob Goodman thinks that in order to understand what eloquence is, we need to look not just at the person up on stage and how they’re talking, but how the people in the audience are responding, and how the speaker is responding to their responses, and how they’re responding to the responses to their responses, and so on, ad infinitum. What makes eloquence happen isn’t really individual speakers talking in vacuum, so much as it is groups of people conversing together. Or at least that’s his idea. Eloquence isn’t just one person speaking skillfully; it’s several people conversing skillfully.


In this episode, our distinguished guest also argues that when a public speech goes well, it goes well because both the person speaking and the people listening are taking some risks. The person speaking is sort of on the spot, risking embarrassment, and the people listening might have to rethink their prior beliefs, which takes a lot of work, at least assuming they make an effort to live by their beliefs. When a speech does what it’s supposed to, these risks are shared between all parties, rather than farmed off onto just one. But when the speaker tries to give the appearance of taking risks without actually doing so, you end up with the audience shouldering 100% of the burden, and the exchange ends up somewhat dysfunctional. This, argues our guest, is what happens when politicians go to great lengths to control or sanitize the environment in which they speak, so that no matter what, they don’t embarrass themselves. Sort of like riding a roller coaster with a safety bar.


Tune in to hear more about what makes for a great speech!


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Avsnitt(153)

Episode 41: David Enoch discusses metaethics

Episode 41: David Enoch discusses metaethics

In this episode, David Enoch argues that there are real facts of the matter about whether something is right or wrong, and that our ability to deliberate about what to do depends on this. Hosted on Ac...

9 Nov 201239min

Episode 40: Johan van Benthem discusses logical dynamics

Episode 40: Johan van Benthem discusses logical dynamics

In this episode, Johan van Benthem argues that the subject matter of logic should be broadened to encompass not only processes of inference performed by individuals, but also the sharing of informatio...

8 Okt 201236min

Episode 39: Nicholas Asher discusses the philosophy of language

Episode 39: Nicholas Asher discusses the philosophy of language

In this episode, Nicholas Asher discusses some of the challenges faced by philosophers, linguists, and computer scientists when it comes to developing a formal theory of meaning that (for example) a c...

4 Sep 201231min

Episode 38: Christopher Frey discusses Aristotle on living organisms and their parts

Episode 38: Christopher Frey discusses Aristotle on living organisms and their parts

In this episode, Christopher Frey explains why Aristotle thought that after you sever a person's hand, it isn't really a hand anymore. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

8 Aug 201225min

Episode 37: Catarina Dutilh Novaes discusses methods in philosophy

Episode 37: Catarina Dutilh Novaes discusses methods in philosophy

In this episode, Catarina Dutilh Novaes talks about whether there is any one method that's specific to philosophy, the way there is (for example) something we call the scientific method. Hosted on Aca...

10 Juli 201225min

Episode 36: Robert van Rooij discusses vagueness

Episode 36: Robert van Rooij discusses vagueness

In this episode, Robert van Rooij talks about a paradox that arises when you try to decide exactly how many millimeters high someone has to be in order to count as tall. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com...

15 Juni 201232min

Episode 35: Martha Nussbaum discusses the capabilities approach

Episode 35: Martha Nussbaum discusses the capabilities approach

In this episode, Martha Nussbaum proposes a new set of criteria for determining the overall health and prosperity of a country. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

7 Maj 201228min

Episode 34: Kieran Setiya discusses moral disagreement

Episode 34: Kieran Setiya discusses moral disagreement

In this episode, Kieran Setiya discusses the difference between disagreeing with someone about how you should live your life and disagreeing with someone about what you just saw (like, for example, wh...

9 Apr 201231min

Populärt inom Samhälle & Kultur

en-mork-historia
podme-dokumentar
gynning-berg
p3-dokumentar
mardromsgasten
aftonbladet-krim
nemo-moter-en-van
skaringer-nessvold
badfluence
creepypodden-med-jack-werner
killradet
hor-har
flashback-forever
kod-katastrof
spar
vad-blir-det-for-mord
p1-dokumentar
aftonbladet-daily
blenda-2
historiska-brott