Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Elucidations13 Juni 2022

Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence

This time around, Matt sits down with Rob Goodman to talk about political eloquence. Goodman is the author of a new book on this topic called Words on Fire, which you can pick up a copy of wherever you like to get books.


Can you think of the last time you saw someone give a rousing speech? They step up to the podium with throngs of onlookers staring at them. Somehow, rather than nervously scampering offstage or melting into a puddle, they speak off the cuff in a way that transfixes everyone listening. Their words feel fresh, sincere, and yet somehow also perfect, like a movie star nailing their big scene on the first take. You’d think that someone speaking from the heart would falter or stumble the way the rest of us do, but against all odds, this feels both maximally authentic and maximally polished.


What is it that makes a speaker compelling to listen to? Rob Goodman thinks that in order to understand what eloquence is, we need to look not just at the person up on stage and how they’re talking, but how the people in the audience are responding, and how the speaker is responding to their responses, and how they’re responding to the responses to their responses, and so on, ad infinitum. What makes eloquence happen isn’t really individual speakers talking in vacuum, so much as it is groups of people conversing together. Or at least that’s his idea. Eloquence isn’t just one person speaking skillfully; it’s several people conversing skillfully.


In this episode, our distinguished guest also argues that when a public speech goes well, it goes well because both the person speaking and the people listening are taking some risks. The person speaking is sort of on the spot, risking embarrassment, and the people listening might have to rethink their prior beliefs, which takes a lot of work, at least assuming they make an effort to live by their beliefs. When a speech does what it’s supposed to, these risks are shared between all parties, rather than farmed off onto just one. But when the speaker tries to give the appearance of taking risks without actually doing so, you end up with the audience shouldering 100% of the burden, and the exchange ends up somewhat dysfunctional. This, argues our guest, is what happens when politicians go to great lengths to control or sanitize the environment in which they speak, so that no matter what, they don’t embarrass themselves. Sort of like riding a roller coaster with a safety bar.


Tune in to hear more about what makes for a great speech!


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Avsnitt(153)

Episode 129: Nethanel Lipshitz discusses discrimination

Episode 129: Nethanel Lipshitz discusses discrimination

This month, Ben Andrew and I are joined by Nethanel Lipshitz (Tel Aviv University, Bar-Ilan University) to talk about discrimination.If someone treats me unequally--that is, if they give other people ...

27 Sep 202051min

Episode 128: Melissa Fusco discusses free choice permission

Episode 128: Melissa Fusco discusses free choice permission

One of the foundational ideas behind philosophical logic is that when you say something, that has further implications beyond the single thing you said. Like, if I think ‘every single frog is green’ a...

16 Aug 202041min

Episode 127 - Nic Koziolek discusses self-knowledge

Episode 127 - Nic Koziolek discusses self-knowledge

In this episode, Nic Koziolek (Washington University in St. Louis) returns to talk to me and Nora Bradford about self-consciousness.Self-consciousness, as philosophers use the term, is a word for when...

15 Juli 202040min

Episode 126 - Listener Q&A with Agnes Callard and Ben Callard

Episode 126 - Listener Q&A with Agnes Callard and Ben Callard

Three philosophers. Eight head-scratchers. 50 minutes. In this episode, Agnes Callard, Ben Callard and I respond to the world's most awesome listener-recorded questions.A lot of people have the impres...

11 Juni 202047min

Episode 125: James Koppel discusses counterfactual inference and automated explanation

Episode 125: James Koppel discusses counterfactual inference and automated explanation

Episode link here.In this episode, James Koppel (MIT, James Koppel Coaching) joins me and Dominick Reo to talk about how we can write software to help identify the causes of disasters.These days, ther...

17 Apr 202038min

Elucidations Episode 124: Graham Priest discusses Buddhist political philosophy

Elucidations Episode 124: Graham Priest discusses Buddhist political philosophy

Episode link here:https://elucidations.now.sh/posts/episode-124/In this episode, Graham Priest returns to discuss Buddhist political philosophy with me and Henry Curtis. (Last month, we talked with hi...

21 Mars 202040min

Episode 123: Graham Priest discusses Buddhist metaphysics

Episode 123: Graham Priest discusses Buddhist metaphysics

In this episode, Matt Teichman and Henry Curtis talk to Graham Priest (CUNY Graduate Center) about the philosophical foundations of Buddhism.Buddhism isn't just a religion--it's an entire family of ph...

15 Feb 202048min

Episode 122: Frithjof Bergmann and David Helmbold discuss new work, new culture

Episode 122: Frithjof Bergmann and David Helmbold discuss new work, new culture

In this episode, Frithjof Bergmann and David Helmbold make the case for a different approach to working in the modern world. A lot of us experience our day to day work as a 'mild disease'--not terribl...

17 Jan 202039min

Populärt inom Samhälle & Kultur

en-mork-historia
podme-dokumentar
gynning-berg
p3-dokumentar
mardromsgasten
aftonbladet-krim
nemo-moter-en-van
skaringer-nessvold
badfluence
creepypodden-med-jack-werner
killradet
hor-har
flashback-forever
kod-katastrof
spar
vad-blir-det-for-mord
p1-dokumentar
aftonbladet-daily
blenda-2
historiska-brott