Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Elucidations13 Juni 2022

Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence

This time around, Matt sits down with Rob Goodman to talk about political eloquence. Goodman is the author of a new book on this topic called Words on Fire, which you can pick up a copy of wherever you like to get books.


Can you think of the last time you saw someone give a rousing speech? They step up to the podium with throngs of onlookers staring at them. Somehow, rather than nervously scampering offstage or melting into a puddle, they speak off the cuff in a way that transfixes everyone listening. Their words feel fresh, sincere, and yet somehow also perfect, like a movie star nailing their big scene on the first take. You’d think that someone speaking from the heart would falter or stumble the way the rest of us do, but against all odds, this feels both maximally authentic and maximally polished.


What is it that makes a speaker compelling to listen to? Rob Goodman thinks that in order to understand what eloquence is, we need to look not just at the person up on stage and how they’re talking, but how the people in the audience are responding, and how the speaker is responding to their responses, and how they’re responding to the responses to their responses, and so on, ad infinitum. What makes eloquence happen isn’t really individual speakers talking in vacuum, so much as it is groups of people conversing together. Or at least that’s his idea. Eloquence isn’t just one person speaking skillfully; it’s several people conversing skillfully.


In this episode, our distinguished guest also argues that when a public speech goes well, it goes well because both the person speaking and the people listening are taking some risks. The person speaking is sort of on the spot, risking embarrassment, and the people listening might have to rethink their prior beliefs, which takes a lot of work, at least assuming they make an effort to live by their beliefs. When a speech does what it’s supposed to, these risks are shared between all parties, rather than farmed off onto just one. But when the speaker tries to give the appearance of taking risks without actually doing so, you end up with the audience shouldering 100% of the burden, and the exchange ends up somewhat dysfunctional. This, argues our guest, is what happens when politicians go to great lengths to control or sanitize the environment in which they speak, so that no matter what, they don’t embarrass themselves. Sort of like riding a roller coaster with a safety bar.


Tune in to hear more about what makes for a great speech!


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Avsnitt(153)

Episode 97: Meghan Sullivan discusses time biases

Episode 97: Meghan Sullivan discusses time biases

In this episode, Meghan Sullivan argues that if it's irrational to sacrifice long-term benefits for short-term gain, then it's also irrational to prefer for bad experiences to have already happened. H...

11 Juni 201755min

Episode 96: Nic Koziolek discusses the role of belief in reasoning

Episode 96: Nic Koziolek discusses the role of belief in reasoning

In this episode, Nic Koziolek offers an account of what thought, belief, and reasoning are in terms of what knowledge is. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

8 Maj 201741min

Episode 95: Zed Adams discusses the genealogy of color

Episode 95: Zed Adams discusses the genealogy of color

In this episode, Zed Adams argues that philosophers are in an irresolvable debate about whether colors are real because they inherited multiple conflicting conceptions of what color is from previous g...

10 Apr 201732min

Episode 94: Zsofia Zvolenszky discusses fictional names

Episode 94: Zsofia Zvolenszky discusses fictional names

In this episode, Zsofia Zvolenszky argues that names like 'Harry Potter' or 'Princess Leia' stand for non-concrete human-made artifacts. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

23 Mars 201736min

Episode 93: Barry Lam discusses obligations after death

Episode 93: Barry Lam discusses obligations after death

In this episode, Barry Lam examines our common assumption that we should prioritize honoring the wishes of dead people. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

30 Jan 201741min

Episode 92: Kristie Dotson discusses epistemic oppression

Episode 92: Kristie Dotson discusses epistemic oppression

In this episode, Kristie Dotson discusses how imbalances in the way we share information with each other reflect broader power imbalances between social groups. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy ...

14 Jan 201743min

Episode 91: Paolo Santorio discusses counterfactuals

Episode 91: Paolo Santorio discusses counterfactuals

In this episode, Paolo Santorio argues that to explain what statements like 'If A were, then B would be' mean, we need to understand them as statements about causal networks. Hosted on Acast. See acas...

23 Dec 201635min

Episode 90: Ásta Sveinsdóttir discusses social construction

Episode 90: Ásta Sveinsdóttir discusses social construction

In this episode, our guest argues that we confer social statuses on each other by treating each other has having different obligations and entitlements. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more...

20 Nov 201629min

Populärt inom Samhälle & Kultur

en-mork-historia
podme-dokumentar
gynning-berg
p3-dokumentar
mardromsgasten
aftonbladet-krim
nemo-moter-en-van
skaringer-nessvold
badfluence
creepypodden-med-jack-werner
killradet
hor-har
flashback-forever
kod-katastrof
spar
vad-blir-det-for-mord
p1-dokumentar
aftonbladet-daily
blenda-2
historiska-brott