330 - Should Women Be Allowed To Hit Men?

Sponsor Link:

The Men's Guide to High-Conflict Divorce & The Police Are Not Your Friends

https://amzn.to/36YftNl

Men, Women, and Optimal Violence

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wuy14...

Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c

Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com

Bitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv

Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video is brought to you by a donation from The Chungus Among Us and here's what he briefly has to say: "Hey, I just wanted to send a short message showing my great appreciation for the work you do. Hopefully I'll eventually be able to support your work a little more my little addition will be another grain in the heap keeping you fed. Keep up the great work, you're truly saving lives Sandman!!" Well Chungus thanks for the support as YouTube continues to throttle my channel into oblivion. I wanted to share a crazy article I found called men, women, and optimal violence and here's what the summary of it says and I quote: "While both men and women can, and do, use violence against each other, men’s violence against women is far more common, less justified, and more destructive than women’s violence against men. One of the reasons for this asymmetry is that men do not fear retaliation for violence against women, whereas women do fear retaliation for their use of violence against men. The distribution of violence between the genders, then, is suboptimal. Society would be better off as a whole if more women were willing to engage in justified violence against men, and fewer men were willing to engage in unjustified violence against women. To that end, women’s justified violence against men should be encouraged, protected, and publicized. This will require a reversal of the current trend in legal and social practices, which is to tolerate and encourage men’s unjustified violence against women while discouraging and legally restricting women’s violence against men. Even if encouraging an increase in women’s justified violence against men may sometimes result in unjustified or disproportionate violence in individual situations, the overall effects of the redistribution of violence will be preferable to the current asymmetry." unquote So here we have a woman named Mary Anne Franks that expects men to get married and accept being a part of battered husband syndrome. She says that women that report violence from men fear retaliation. As if men don't fear being hunted down the street for hitting a woman by the popo. As if women don't have battered whamen shelters to run to if they are hit. How about instead of justifying violence against either men or women as normal we make it unacceptable for both men and women to hit each other? Men aren't even allowed to have shelters to go to if they experience spousal abuse. The feminists saw to that back in the 1970s. Every time a men's shelter is setup it's always shut down. Not to mention that Erin Pizzey opened a shelter for men and women in the 1970s and found that about half the people being abused by their spouse physically were men and the other half were women. That violence was already pretty equally distributed between the sexes. But if that were to be made a reality then it wouldn't paint women in a positive light so feminist forced her to shut down. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor T Fitz:

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy