139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)

139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)

We chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation An academic librarian’s perpsective on the importance of open reseasch The importance of copyright in research and what it means signing over your copyright The PDF crisis! What does a program officer at a grant funding organsiation do? Why should funding organisations care about open science? Why open access is more than just about acacemic papers, but extends to posters and presentations Why can't academics collectively decide to push back against the big publishers? The difference between private funders vs. goverment funding agencies Other links Everything Hertz on social media - Dan on twitter (https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana) - James on twitter (https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) - Everything Hertz on twitter (https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff! $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month Music credits Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere (https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Episode citation Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 6) "139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FQXSZ Special Guest: Ashley Farley.

Avsnitt(195)

179: Discovery vs. maintenance

179: Discovery vs. maintenance

Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources. Other things they cover: Should there be an annual l...

3 Apr 202448min

178: Alerting researchers about retractions

178: Alerting researchers about retractions

Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracte...

29 Feb 202449min

177: Plagiarism

177: Plagiarism

We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism ...

31 Jan 202442min

176: Tracking academic workloads

176: Tracking academic workloads

We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads. This episode was originally recorded in May 2023 in a hotel room just before o...

29 Dec 202336min

175: Defending against the scientific dark arts

175: Defending against the scientific dark arts

We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would th...

7 Dec 202338min

174: Smug missionaries with test tubes

174: Smug missionaries with test tubes

James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also tal...

1 Nov 202353min

173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?

173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psycho...

1 Okt 202335min

172: In defence of the discussion section

172: In defence of the discussion section

Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing. Links * The paper (https://doi.org/10.1007/s1122...

31 Aug 202335min

Populärt inom Vetenskap

dumma-manniskor
p3-dystopia
allt-du-velat-veta
kapitalet-en-podd-om-ekonomi
svd-nyhetsartiklar
rss-vetenskapsradion
det-morka-psyket
rss-vetenskapsradion-2
rss-ufo-bortom-rimligt-tvivel-2
rss-spraket
dumforklarat
medicinvetarna
sexet
barnpsykologerna
paranormalt-med-caroline-giertz
hacka-livet
halsorevolutionen
vetenskapsradion
doden-hjarnan-kemisten
rss-tidslinjen-podcast