Karen Read's Retrial Heats Up: K-9s, Cameras, and Constitutional Rights
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe17 Apr

Karen Read's Retrial Heats Up: K-9s, Cameras, and Constitutional Rights

Karen Read's Retrial Heats Up: K-9s, Cameras, and Constitutional Rights

So, here's where things got spicy: the judge agreed that Aidan Kearney—aka Turtleboy—has a valid basis to plead the Fifth Amendment in this case. That right there is the kind of courtroom moment that makes legal dramas look tame. Prosecutor Hank Brennan even conceded it. Kearney’s attorney, Timothy Bradl, said flat out that if called, Kearney would plead the Fifth, and the judge is letting him stay in the courtroom unless witnesses tied to his own witness intimidation case are on the stand. That’s where we ended for the day: “We’re all set until Tuesday.”

But let’s rewind a bit and walk through what led up to that mic-drop moment. The judge kicked things off with the defense’s renewed request for a forensic copy of video footage from inside the Canton Police Department’s garage. That’s been denied before, but defense attorney Elizabeth Little said they've now got expert testimony swearing there's still relevant metadata that could be extracted. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan, on the other hand, basically said, “Sure, come download whatever we’ve got,” but drew the line at handing over a full image of the department’s detective file since it includes unrelated case material. The judge didn’t make a ruling on that one—so, still in limbo.

Then there’s the canine controversy. Brennan’s not thrilled with the defense’s dog expert, Garrett Wing. He said Wing has no formal certifications and has never testified in court. But Robert Alessi fired back, saying Wing is a leading national expert on law enforcement K-9s. Wing might not have the standard paperwork, but apparently, the guy’s resume still carries weight. Meanwhile, Judge Cannone is standing firm on allowing Dr. Crosby—an expert for the prosecution—to testify, but she doesn’t believe Crosby can definitively say the marks on John O’Keefe’s arms came from Chloe, the German Shepherd allegedly involved.

Brennan tried to argue those bite marks don’t line up with Chloe’s mouth dimensions, but the judge called that an “uphill battle.” Not the kind of response a prosecutor wants to hear going into opening statements.

Then came the courtroom theater debate. Brennan wants to use an “independent reader” to read aloud some of Read’s text messages during trial—maybe a plain-clothed officer or another neutral voice. Defense attorney Alan Jackson wasn’t exactly sold, saying he needs more info before agreeing. Judge Cannone didn’t love the idea either, warning it could turn into a theatrical presentation that doesn’t belong in a courtroom. You know, courtroom not Broadway.

There’s also the ongoing tug-of-war over the ARCCA witnesses—the experts hired by the feds who testified in the first trial that O’Keefe likely wasn’t hit by a car. Brennan wants a full breakdown of these experts’ relationship with the defense since the defense ended up paying them after the mistrial. He’s pushing for a pre-testimony hearing, accusing the defense of setting up a potential “trial by ambush” with possible late-arriving evidence.

Jackson responded by saying ARCCA hasn’t done any new testing—yet. But he admits the defense gave ARCCA new info as recently as March 25 and expects more updates soon. The judge still seems fuzzy on which expert did what, but Jackson insists they’re not hiding anything.

Speaking of evidence wars, both sides agreed to allow an alternative DNA analyst for the prosecution, and the judge asked for previews of the props each side plans to use in opening statements. The prosecution is bringing video clips. The defense? Just one photo.

Back to the courtroom logistics—Judge Cannone wants the jury’s scene view to go smoothly. Read will likely travel separately with her attorneys, but at least one defense attorney has to be on the juror bus to match the prosecution’s presence. Cannone also expanded the buffer zone outside the courthouse after complaints from the first trial's jurors about noisy demonstrators. Apparently, the yelling and chanting could be heard during deliberations. Nothing like public protests to set the mood for life-or-death legal decisions.

Now for the bigger legal chessboard. Read’s team is making a Hail Mary pass to the Supreme Court, asking it to throw out two of the three charges, including second-degree murder, claiming the original jury actually acquitted her on those. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson already denied the request for an emergency pause on the retrial, but the full Supreme Court will consider the appeal on April 25. It only takes four of nine justices to hear it—but that’s rare air.

So far, Read’s retrial team includes five lawyers, one of whom—Victoria George—was an alternate juror in the original trial. Yeah, that’s some wild trivia.

Opening statements are scheduled for April 22, and the new jury—nine women, nine men—will have plenty to chew on. The prosecution plans to lean heavily on Read’s own words from her many interviews. Meanwhile, the defense continues to allege a cover-up involving law enforcement, claiming O’Keefe was beaten inside the house, bitten by a dog, and left outside—not struck by Read’s car.

And sitting in the gallery this week? Just some cousins and friends of John O’Keefe. His brother and parents weren’t there for this round.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama

Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Avsnitt(500)

The Karen Read Puzzle: Was the Evidence Clear or Too Muddy?

The Karen Read Puzzle: Was the Evidence Clear or Too Muddy?

The Karen Read Puzzle: Was the Evidence Clear or Too Muddy? Description: In this critical breakdown, Hidden Killers host Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examine whether the evidence in the Karen Read trial was ever truly clear—or hopelessly muddy from the start. The prosecution argued that Read backed her SUV into John O’Keefe while intoxicated, leaving him to die in the snow. But the defense countered with conflicting expert opinions, challenges to forensic evidence, and pointed questions about the conduct of those inside the house that night. Coffindaffer dissects each piece of the state’s case—taillight fragments, injury patterns, and cell phone timelines—to determine whether the prosecution’s puzzle added up to a complete picture. What emerges is a case clouded by missing witness testimony, unexplored rebuttals, and decisions that may have left the jury unconvinced. Why didn’t the state present its crash reconstruction data? Why wasn’t a second medical examiner brought in to clarify the cause of death? And how did ambiguous statements from witnesses and officials shape the jury’s view? We also discuss the psychological dynamic at play: Did jurors feel overwhelmed by conflicting expert analysis? Did prosecution fatigue lead to key strategic omissions? This is the episode that puts the entire Karen Read trial under the microscope. Was the evidence truly there? Or was the picture always just too incomplete? Hashtags: #KarenRead #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JenniferCoffindaffer #ForensicEvidence #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #TrialBreakdown #CrashReconstruction #ReasonableDoubt #MurderInvestigation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

27 Juni 25min

Karen Read or Cover-Up? Why Jurors Had Reasonable Doubt

Karen Read or Cover-Up? Why Jurors Had Reasonable Doubt

Karen Read or Cover-Up? Why Jurors Had Reasonable Doubt Description: Was this a case of guilt—or just too many unanswered questions? In this installment of Hidden Killers, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine the roots of the reasonable doubt that ultimately led jurors to acquit Karen Read of murder and manslaughter charges in the death of Officer John O’Keefe. From the very beginning, the case was fraught with complications: a flawed investigation, internal police drama, and key witnesses who never took the stand. Coffindaffer highlights the law enforcement missteps that contributed to the doubt—such as the dismissal of lead investigator Michael Proctor, inconsistencies in forensic data, and the lack of direct evidence placing Read at the scene of the collision. We also explore the optics that fueled public skepticism: Why did no one inside 34 Fairview Road come outside when O’Keefe was allegedly dying in the snow? Why were cell phones discarded just before they were to be turned over to investigators? And why were rebuttal witnesses, including crash reconstructionists and a second medical examiner, left out of the prosecution’s final presentation? This episode is a forensic and legal deep dive into how perception, silence, and investigative gaps created a perfect storm of doubt. As Coffindaffer notes, sometimes it’s not what the jury sees—it’s what they don’t see that changes everything. Hashtags: #KarenRead #CoverUpTheory #ReasonableDoubt #JuryAcquittal #HiddenKillersPodcast #JenniferCoffindaffer #JohnOKeefeCase #TrueCrimeCommunity #PoliceAccountability #TrialStrategy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

25 Juni 19min

Karen Read Walks Free—The Jury Has Spoken. Now What?

Karen Read Walks Free—The Jury Has Spoken. Now What?

Karen Read Walks Free—The Jury Has Spoken. Now What Description: In this episode of Hidden Killers, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to break down what happens next after Karen Read was acquitted of second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a fatal accident in the death of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. While Read was convicted of operating under the influence, the jury’s decision to acquit on all other charges stunned many observers. We examine what this verdict means for the justice system, the O’Keefe family, and the investigators who worked the case. Was this simply a matter of reasonable doubt—or does it suggest something deeper, like jury nullification? Coffindaffer weighs in on the rare legal circumstances under which a criminal verdict could be challenged, and why, in this case, a retrial is almost certainly off the table. We also explore the potential fallout: Will the case resurface in civil court? Will those who were publicly accused by proxy seek legal recourse of their own? What protections still apply, and which ones no longer do? This is more than a verdict recap—it’s an expert-level breakdown of what happens when a high-profile case meets a courtroom crossroad. The jury has spoken, but the consequences of that decision are only beginning. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JuryVerdict #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JohnOKeefe #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #ReasonableDoubt #CivilTrial #DoubleJeopardy #FBIInsight Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

23 Juni 15min

Karen Read Trial Aftermath: Breaking Down Albert’s & Proctor’s ABC Interviews

Karen Read Trial Aftermath: Breaking Down Albert’s & Proctor’s ABC Interviews

Karen Read Trial Aftermath: Breaking Down Albert’s & Proctor’s ABC Interviews Description: In this episode, we unpack two pivotal ABC 20/20 interviews that unfolded in the immediate aftermath of Karen Read’s acquittal on second-degree murder charges for the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Firstly, crime scene host Matt Gutman sits down with Michael Proctor — the now-disgraced former Massachusetts State Trooper who led the original investigation and was later dismissed after a string of shocking, misogynistic text messages about Read were made public. Proctor candidly addresses every major controversy: from the crudeness of his private texts to the explosive accusations that he may have tampered with evidence—such as the taillight of Read’s vehicle. He refutes all conspiratorial claims, insisting there was “no conspiracy” and that his investigative methods followed protocol, even conceding that perhaps “we could have looked at other people’s cars just to say we did it” to avoid the conspiracy narrative. Secondly, we break down an insightful interview with Brian Albert, whose suburban Canton home was the scene of that tragic night when O’Keefe’s body was found in the snow. Albert weighs in on the defensive theory that O’Keefe was injured inside the house—possibly during a physical altercation or dog attack—and then staged to implicate Read. His ABC segment adds emotional depth and scrutiny as he voices lingering concerns over jurors’ doubt and calls the verdict “a devastating miscarriage of justice” . Through extensive analysis, this episode contrasts Proctor’s steadfast defense of his legitimacy with Albert’s heartfelt challenge to the acquittal. We proceed chronologically: evaluating the strongest rebuttals Proctor issues, the live reactions from both the investigator and the victim’s inner circle, and how these interviews shape public and legal discourse around the case. We also assess the broader implications—how Proctor’s firing and testimony may impact police accountability reforms, and whether Albert’s spotlight will pressure the ongoing civil lawsuit filed by O’Keefe’s family. Listeners will come away with a nuanced understanding of the emotions, contradictions, and lasting tensions that persist after one of Massachusetts’ most divisive trials. This is more than a post-trial recap—it’s a layered examination of power, perception, and the pursuit of justice. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #MichaelProctor #BrianAlbert #ABC2020 #CaseAftermath #JusticeDebate #TrueCrimeBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

23 Juni 58min

Karen Read Found Not Guilty - Live Coverage As It Happened-WEEK IN REVIEW

Karen Read Found Not Guilty - Live Coverage As It Happened-WEEK IN REVIEW

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

22 Juni 28min

Breaking Down The Karen Read Trial From 2 Perspectives With Bob Motta & Tony Brueski

Breaking Down The Karen Read Trial From 2 Perspectives With Bob Motta & Tony Brueski

Breaking Down The Karen Read Trial From 2 Perspectives With Bob Motta & Tony Brueski In this must‑watch episode of Hidden Killers, veteran defense attorney Bob Motta and true crime host Tony Brueski team up for a rare, civil‑conversation style breakdown of the Karen Read verdict. Motta insists Karen is innocent, pointing to forensic flaws, DNA ambiguity, and a possible blackout memory gap—while Brueski argues it was likely a tragic accident, not manslaughter, and points to injury patterns consistent with an unintended collision. We dive deep into: Legal strategy: Why Motta shifted from “voicemail rage” theory to a psychological blackout defense Forensic details: Spatter, impact analysis, shoe‑DNA, and accident reconstruction Psychological elements: Karen’s inconsistent statements, possible dissociation under stress, and mental health triggers True crime hooks: Did the jury buy the deception or the defense’s blackout narrative? Twisting mystery: Was John O’Keefe a victim of fate—or did Karen’s own narrative betray her? Featuring exclusive verdict analysis, courtroom psychology insights, and a forensic science deep‑dive, this video is essential for anyone fascinated by criminal memory, legal nuance, and justice vs deception. If you're into true crime, fascinated by DNA evidence, or want an unfiltered legal breakdown, this is your go‑to summary of the Karen Read trial aftermath.  Hit  to see both sides finally come together, examine the evidence, and debate the true meaning of manslaughter vs accident. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

20 Juni 49min

Karen Read's NARCISSIST Playbook: Blame Everyone Else | 12 Examples of Zero Accountability

Karen Read's NARCISSIST Playbook: Blame Everyone Else | 12 Examples of Zero Accountability

Karen Read's NARCISSIST Playbook: Blame Everyone Else | 12 Examples of Zero Accountability DESCRIPTION: PATHOLOGICAL BLAME-SHIFTING EXPOSED: In this psychological deep-dive, we examine how Karen Read has blamed literally EVERYONE except herself for John O'Keefe's death. From vast conspiracy theories to attacking grieving witnesses, Read displays textbook narcissistic behavior that mental health experts say reveals her guilt. The 12 most shocking examples of Read's blame game: Claiming the ENTIRE Canton Police Department framed her Accusing the Albert family of murder with zero evidence Blaming O'Keefe for "making her" drink and drive Attacking EMTs for "contaminating" the scene Accusing the snow plow driver of "destroying evidence" Claiming her own friends "misremembered" her confessions Blaming the judge for "bias" when rulings don't go her way Attacking the media while hiring a PR firm Accusing prosecutors of "hiding" non-existent evidence Blaming alcohol for her "not remembering" killing O'Keefe Claiming witnesses "conspired" to frame her before the body was found Even blaming the weather for "confusing" the evidence Dr. Patricia Matthews, clinical psychologist specializing in personality disorders, explains how narcissists create elaborate alternate realities where they're perpetual victims. Read's inability to accept ANY responsibility - even for undisputed facts like her drunk driving - reveals someone incapable of admitting guilt. We examine how this blame-shifting strategy has backfired spectacularly with the jury, who've watched Read point fingers at everyone while refusing to testify herself. When you accuse dozens of people of conspiracy but won't answer questions under oath, credibility dies. The victim here is John O'Keefe, but to hear Karen Read tell it, she's the real victim of everyone else's lies. Classic narcissist. Classic guilty behavior. #NarcissistExposed #BlameEveryone #KarenReadGuilt #ZeroAccountability #PathologicalLiar #PersonalityDisorder #VictimMentality #ConspiracyExcuses #RefusingResponsibility #TrueCrimePsychology Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

19 Juni 11min

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – VERDICT

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – VERDICT

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – VERDICT This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend’s home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

18 Juni 7min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

svenska-fall
aftonbladet-krim
rss-krimstad
p3-krim
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
fordomspodden
rss-viva-fotboll
olyckan-inifran
flashback-forever
aftonbladet-daily
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-frandfors-horna
dagens-eko
rss-expressen-dok
rss-krimreportrarna
motiv
krimmagasinet
rss-flodet
blenda-2