The U.S. Army explored using radioactive poisons to assassinate important individuals such as military or civilian leaders, according to newly declassified docs.  Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden secret....

The U.S. Army explored using radioactive poisons to assassinate important individuals such as military or civilian leaders, according to newly declassified docs.  Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden secret....

"Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead." –Benjamin Franklin.

For 3 decades the United States of America performed human radiation experiments on about 700 human beings. In 1986 Congressman Ed Markey released a report that detailed 31 experiments that tracked the effects of radiation on people. Between the years of 1945 and 1947, doctors in hospitals actually injected eighteen patients with plutonium.

Do you have a psychopath in your life? The best way to find out is read my book. BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4

Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life

Hetch Hetchy - Wikipedia

Inside the Army's Radiological Weapon Research

"In one of the longest-held secrets of the Cold War, the U.S. Army explored the potential for using radioactive poisons to assassinate ‘important individuals’ such as military or civilian leaders," according to newly declassified documents obtained by The Associated Press.

Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden […]

Inside the Army's Radiological Weapon Research | WIRED

"In one of the longest-held secrets of the Cold War, the U.S. Army explored the potential for using radioactive poisons to assassinate 'important individuals' such as military or civilian leaders," according to newly declassified documents obtained by The Associated Press.

Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden part of the military's pursuit of a "new concept of warfare" using radioactive materials from atomic bombmaking to contaminate swaths of enemy land or to target military bases, factories or troop formations.

The documents give no indication whether a radiological weapon for targeting high-ranking individuals was ever used or even developed by the United States. They leave unclear how far the Army project went.

One memo from December 1948 outlined the project and another memo that month indicated it was under way. The main sections of several subsequent progress reports in 1949 were removed by censors before release to the AP...

The broader effort on offensive uses of radiological warfare apparently died by about 1954, at least in part because of the Defense
Department's conviction that nuclear weapons were a better bet...

Among the documents released to the AP — an Army memo dated Dec. 16,
1948, and labeled secret — described a crash program to develop a variety of military uses for radioactive materials.

Work on a "subversive weapon for attack of individuals or small groups" was listed as a secondary priority, to be confined to feasibility studies and experiments.

The top priorities listed were:

  • 1 — Weapons to contaminate "populated or otherwise critical areas for long periods of time.
  • 2 — Munitions combining high explosives with radioactive material
    "to accomplish physical damage and radioactive contamination simultaneously."
  • 3 — Air and-or surface weapons that would spread contamination across an area to be evacuated, thereby rendering it unusable by enemy forces.

The stated goal was to produce a prototype for the No. 1 and No. 2 priority weapons by Dec. 31, 1950.

Overview of the Radiological Weapon Program

  • Initiated: 1948
  • Approved by: Highest levels of the U.S. Army
  • Purpose:
  • Develop a “new concept of warfare” using radioactive materials.
  • Explore the use of radioactive poisons for assassinating “important individuals” (military or civilian leaders).
  • Create weapons that could contaminate land, facilities, and enemy formations.

⚛ Key Priorities (as per the December 16, 1948 Army memo)

Weapons to contaminate populated or critical areas long-term

  • Goal: Deny use of vital territory to the enemy by rendering it radioactive for extended periods.

Munitions combining explosives with radioactive material

  • Goal: Cause both immediate physical destruction and enduring radioactive contamination.

Air or surface weapons to spread contamination

  • Goal: Force evacuation of areas, making them unusable for enemy operations.

Secondary Priority:

  • Development of subversive weapons for targeting individuals or small groups (feasibility studies and experiments only).

⚛ Program Status

  • Timeline:
  • Aimed to produce prototypes for top-priority weapons by December 31, 1950.
  • The offensive radiological weapon effort seems to have ended by around 1954, largely because nuclear weapons were deemed more effective.
  • Secrecy:
  • Progress reports from 1949 were heavily censored before declassification.
  • No conclusive evidence from the documents on whether any radiological assassination weapons were built or deployed.

⚛ Historical Significance

This program illustrates how, in the shadow of the atomic bomb, U.S. military planners briefly explored unconventional ways to leverage radioactive materials for strategic advantage — including ideas now considered ethically and legally reprehensible, such as radiological assassination.

⚛ From Radiological Weapons to “Dirty Electricity”?

  • The radiological weapons program (1948+) aimed to weaponize radioactive contamination for warfare and assassinations.
  • When large-scale use or practical deployment proved difficult (or politically dangerous), new covert technologies might have been explored — perhaps including environmental or household-level electromagnetic/radiological manipulation (what some people today call dirty electricity).

Original Plan: Radiological Weapons

1948 Army plans explored:

  • Assassinations via radioactive poisons.
  • Long-term contamination of critical areas.
  • Weapons mixing explosives + radioactive materials.

By ~1954, these efforts were largely abandoned (at least officially), as nuclear weapons took priority or...........

Early Smart Meter Patent Applications

  • 1970s–1980s: There were patents related to automatic meter reading (AMR) technologies. These were the predecessors to smart meters, focused on remote reading of meters via telephone lines or radio.
  • 1990s: Patents began to appear that combined AMR with two-way communication — an essential feature of smart meters. Examples include:
  • 1991 (US Patent 5,043,851) Remote utility meter reading system using radio signals (Motorola).
  • 1993 (US Patent 5,278,498) Apparatus for remotely reading electric meters.
  • Late 1990s – Early 2000s: The term “smart meter” started appearing in patent filings, alongside developments in mesh networking and PLC (power line communication).
  • 2001 (US Patent 6,278,936) Method and apparatus for real-time monitoring of energy usage (Echelon Corporation).
  • 2002–2003 — Companies like Itron, Landis+Gyr, and Elster began filing patents for more advanced smart meter systems.

Smart Grid & Smart Meter Surge

  • 2004–2008: Major patent activity coincided with the early smart grid initiatives and utility pilot projects.
  • 2005 — Numerous filings by Itron, Landis+Gyr, General Electric, and Siemens focused on two-way communication, demand response, and remote disconnection.
  • 2007 — The U.S. government began emphasizing smart grid tech under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA 2007), sparking a flurry of patents.

Key Patent Holders

  • Itron (formerly Schlumberger's metering division)
  • Landis+Gyr
  • Elster
  • General Electric
  • Siemens
  • Silver Spring Networks
  • Motorola (earlier AMR technology)
  • Echelon
  • Cisco (later networking layers for smart grids)

Timeline Summary

Period

Activity

1970s–1980s

AMR (remote meter reading) patents, no “smart meter” term

1990s

Early two-way communication patents

2000–2004

First smart meter patents focused on real-time monitoring

2005–2008

Surge in smart meter & grid patents, mesh networking, demand-response features

2009+

Continued innovation — integration with smart homes, renewables, and IoT

Could “Dirty Electricity” Be a Successor Concept?

Dirty electricity refers to:

  • Electrical pollution: spikes, surges, and erratic frequencies on power lines not part of the clean 50/60 Hz sine wave.
  • Some researchers (and conspiracy theories) suggest this could:
  • Stress human biology
  • Contribute to chronic illness
  • Be deliberately engineered as an invisible weapon (biological, psychological, or population control)

Hypothetical connection to military doctrine:

  • After giving up radiological poisons, covert programs may have:
  • Explored EMF (electromagnetic fields) and power grid-based ways to affect populations subtly.
  • Focused on long-term, deniable methods (e.g., sickening people via their environment rather than overt weapons).

There are Cold War-era projects in the U.S. and Soviet Union that explored:

  • EMF and microwave effects on health and behavior.
  • Technologies like Project Pandora (U.S. microwave mind control studies, 1950s-1970s).
  • Soviet “Woodpecker” signal and studies of low-frequency EM weapons.

Is There Evidence of Intentional Dirty Electricity as a Weapon?

📝 What we know:

  • There is no declassified proof that dirty electricity was developed as a military population-control tool.
  • But military interest in EMF and its biological effects is well-documented.
  • Power grids could theoretically deliver harmful frequencies — but whether this has been done systematically is unproven, though suspected by some independent researchers.

Theory Fits a Known Pattern

Secret programs start with overt weapons (radiological, nuclear, chemical).
When politically risky or impractical, shift to:

  • Covert technologies (EMF, psychological ops, environmental manipulation).
  • Long-term, low-profile strategies.

PHASE 1: Radiological Warfare Research (1948–1954)

  • Army memos (1948): Plans to create weapons that would:
  • Assassinate individuals with radioactive poisons.
  • Contaminate land to deny its use.
  • Combine explosives + radioactive material.
  • Why it faded:
  • Nuclear bombs were seen as more practical.
  • Radiological weapons could be too indiscriminate or politically dangerous.

PHASE 2: Shift to Invisible, Covert Technologies

  • After 1954, Cold War focus included:
  • Psychotronic weapons / mind control studies (MKULTRA, ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD).
  • Project Pandora (1950s-1970s): U.S. studies of microwave radiation’s effect on the brain, partly in response to the Soviet microwave bombardment of the U.S. embassy in Moscow.
  • Soviet and U.S. interest in ELF/VLF (Extremely Low / Very Low Frequency) fields, for potential use in disrupting human health or cognition.
  • DARPA + CIA: Early research on electromagnetic pulse (EMP) effects, brainwave entrainment, and crowd control using directed energy.

PHASE 3: Possible Domestic Application — Power Grid & Dirty Electricity

  • By the 1970s-80s, researchers like Dr. Robert O. Becker and Neil Cherry warned that artificially altered EMFs could affect health.
  • “Dirty electricity” (high-frequency voltage transients and harmonics riding on standard 60 Hz power) becomes an identified concern in the civilian sector.
  • Some theorists propose:
  • The power grid could be used as an invisible delivery system for harmful EM fields.
  • Intentional manipulation (or reckless military-industrial experimentation) could produce widespread biological stress — fatigue, cancer, mood disorders.

Why this fits a Cold War mindset

Radiological weapons = crude, detectable, diplomatically dangerous.
EMF / power grid weapons = invisible, deniable, continuous, adaptable to “peacetime” or slow-acting population control.

This shift mirrors the larger trend of:

  • Moving from kinetic to silent weapons.
  • Moving from battlefield to environmental battlefields (including homes, cities).

Map of Research Sites + Power Grid Projects

  • Key military labs and test sites linked to radiological and EMF research (e.g., Dugway Proving Ground, Fort Detrick, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, NSA facilities).
  • Locations tied to early power grid expansion and experimental EMF field studies.

Summary of Key Documents

  • Declassified Army memos on radiological weapon projects (1948–1954).
  • Project Pandora and Moscow Signal studies (1950s–70s).
  • Early government and scientific reports on EMF health effects and dirty electricity.
  • Relevant patents and whistleblower statements.

Visual Timeline: From Radiological Weapons to Dirty Electricity

Year

Event/Project

Description

1948

U.S. Army Radiological Weapons Project

Approved secret research on radioactive poisons for assassination and area contamination. Prototypes aimed by 1950.

Early 1950s

Radiological weapon research continues

Project active but heavily censored; dies down by mid-1950s as nuclear weapons take precedence.

1950s–1970s

Project Pandora / Moscow Signal

U.S. investigates microwave radiation exposure from suspected Soviet source; effects on health and cognition studied.

1960s

MKULTRA & related mind control programs

CIA and military explore behavioral control, including EMF and psychotronic effects.

1970s–1980s

Dirty Electricity concept emerges

Scientists document high-frequency electrical noise in power lines, linked to health complaints; military interest in EMF weapons grows.

1980s–2000s

Expansion of EMF weapon research & infrastructure

DARPA and others explore electromagnetic pulse (EMP), crowd control tech; power grid modernizes with increased electronics generating “dirty electricity.”

2000s–present

Public and independent research on EMF & dirty electricity

Health advocates warn about chronic exposure; some link to covert environmental control theories.

  1. Visual Timeline: Radiological Weapons → EMF → Dirty Electricity

Year

Event/Project

Notes

1948

U.S. Army Radiological Weapons

Secret project to develop radioactive poisons and area contamination weapons; ended ~1954

1950s-70s

Project Pandora / Moscow Signal

U.S. studied microwave radiation effects from Soviet embassy targeting; brain effects studied

1950s-70s

MKULTRA, ARTICHOKE

CIA mind control and psychotronic weapons research, including EMF and chemical methods

1960s-80s

Dirty Electricity Identified

Researchers documented electrical pollution in power lines, linked to health concerns

1980s-2000s

DARPA, military EMF weapons research

Research into EMP, crowd control via EMF; power grid and electronics modernization increased “dirty electricity”

2000s–present

Public awareness and independent research

Growing concerns about chronic EMF exposure; some theories about covert use in population control

  1. Map of Research Sites and Power Grid Projects

Key Sites linked to radiological and EMF research:

  • Dugway Proving Ground, Utah — Chemical and radiological testing.
  • Fort Detrick, Maryland — Biological and radiological research.
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts — EMF, radar, and directed energy research.
  • NSA facilities in Maryland & Fort Meade — Intelligence and EMF research.
  • Los Alamos National Lab, New Mexico — Nuclear and radiological weapons development.
  • Soviet facilities: Semipalatinsk Test Site (Kazakhstan), Moscow Signal origin point.

Power Grid-related:

  • Major U.S. power grid hubs linked to EMF studies, such as PJM Interconnection, California ISO.
  • Early experimental sites for EMF transmission (Bell Labs, 1960s).

  1. Summary of Key Documents
  • Army Radiological Weapon Memo, Dec 16, 1948 — outlines priorities, secret status, and project goals.
  • Project Pandora Declassified Files (late 1970s) — detail microwave exposure studies on embassy personnel.
  • Scientific papers on dirty electricity — e.g., Dr. Robert Becker’s work on EMF biological effects (1970s-80s).
  • Whistleblower accounts related to covert EMF exposure or grid manipulation (various sources).

NEW: Psychopath In Your Life Iraq Plutonium and DNA destruction – Psychopath In Your Life

My file on how hormones work. https://psychopathinyourlife.com/CRD/

The Stolen Children Project – Psychopath In Your Life

Timeline and History of Ruling Class – Psychopath In Your Life

WHO are the Royal Monsters running the World? – Psychopath In Your Life

Timeline of Eugenics “Natural” Disasters – Psychopath In Your Life

Psychopath In Your Life – Dianne Emerson – YouTube

Tune in: Podcast Links – Psychopath In Your Life

BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life

TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life

Google Maps My HOME Address: 309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE 68701 SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life

Avsnitt(526)

005 - What Is A Psychopath

005 - What Is A Psychopath

18 Maj 201719min

DIANNE SHARES FROM HER PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH PSYCHOPATHS THE ATTRIBUTES THEY LOOK FOR IN THEIR FUTURE VICTIMS.

DIANNE SHARES FROM HER PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH PSYCHOPATHS THE ATTRIBUTES THEY LOOK FOR IN THEIR FUTURE VICTIMS.

In Episode 003, Dianne shares from her personal interviews with psychopaths the attributes they look for in their future victims. Dianne also explains just how manipulative psychopaths can be and how they use the strategy of gaslighting to maintain control over their victims. Tune in to find out why psychopaths play the victim and just how far they’ll push to stay in control. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – Last episode the kind of personalities psychopaths seek out 00:41 – One guy that Dianne interviewed look at how people’s eyes diverged, how confident they seemed, and even the look of the shoulders when it came to choosing their future victims 01:13 – Investigation Discovery Channel has stories about psychopaths 01:34 – Dateline Show also shares psychopaths’ stories 01:58 – Not all psychopaths are murderers 02:10 – Dealing with a psychopath is all about control 02:34 – Dateline Shows are usually about murder 03:24 – When you watch, read or listen to these stories—“Pay attention to when they describe the victim” 03:47 – The victim is the kind and caring person 04:04 – The victim’s kindness is usually what makes them a target 04:58 – Psychopaths victimize themselves in their own minds 05:13 – They flip and turn things around to make you believe they are the victim 05:51 – Dianne cites an example of how they play the victim 06:32 – Dianne was given a complete checklist of how psychopaths convince people they are the victim 07:08 – “The goal is to get you [the victim] to start to feel like you’re the crazy one and test your sense of normality” 07:21 – A description of the Gaslight Concept 07:51 – Dianne refers to the movie, Gas Light—where the term originated 07:57 – To gaslight is to alter the victim’s reality to fit into with what the psychopath wants it to be 08:59 – A psychopath manipulates to make themselves look like the victim 09:41 – Psychopaths test how far they can push their victims 11:06 – Some psychopaths are actually proud to be one 12:20 – Dianne looks forward for questions and comments 12:41 – Get in touch with Dianne on her website or by email 13:45 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: Psychopaths may have very specific qualities in mind when looking for potential targets. Dealing with a psychopath is all about control. Beware of “gaslighting”—psychopaths like playing the victim when, in fact, they victimize you! Resources Mentioned: Investigation Discovery Channel & Dateline Show– TV shows where stories and documentaries are about crimes that lead to psychopaths Gaslighting – the tactic psychopaths use to alter your reality   Credits – Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives – Podcast Production and Editing Service rendered by Red Walk Boy Prod. Look for Ron (Podcast Producer/Editor)

9 Maj 201713min

003 - Interviewing Psychopaths- They Said WHAT

003 - Interviewing Psychopaths- They Said WHAT

In Episode 003, Dianne shares from her personal interviews with psychopaths the attributes they look for in their future victims. Dianne also explains just how manipulative psychopaths can be and how they use the strategy of gaslighting to maintain control over their victims. Tune in to find out why psychopaths play the victim and just how far they’ll push to stay in control. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – Last episode the kind of personalities psychopaths seek out 00:41 – One guy that Dianne interviewed look at how people’s eyes diverged, how confident they seemed, and even the look of the shoulders when it came to choosing their future victims 01:13 – Investigation Discovery Channel has stories about psychopaths 01:34 – Dateline Show also shares psychopaths’ stories 01:58 – Not all psychopaths are murderers 02:10 – Dealing with a psychopath is all about control 02:34 – Dateline Shows are usually about murder 03:24 – When you watch, read or listen to these stories—“Pay attention to when they describe the victim” 03:47 – The victim is the kind and caring person 04:04 – The victim’s kindness is usually what makes them a target 04:58 – Psychopaths victimize themselves in their own minds 05:13 – They flip and turn things around to make you believe they are the victim 05:51 – Dianne cites an example of how they play the victim 06:32 – Dianne was given a complete checklist of how psychopaths convince people they are the victim 07:08 – “The goal is to get you [the victim] to start to feel like you’re the crazy one and test your sense of normality” 07:21 – A description of the Gaslight Concept 07:51 – Dianne refers to the movie, Gas Light—where the term originated 07:57 – To gaslight is to alter the victim’s reality to fit into with what the psychopath wants it to be 08:59 – A psychopath manipulates to make themselves look like the victim 09:41 – Psychopaths test how far they can push their victims 11:06 – Some psychopaths are actually proud to be one 12:20 – Dianne looks forward for questions and comments 12:41 – Get in touch with Dianne on her website or by email 13:45 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: Psychopaths may have very specific qualities in mind when looking for potential targets. Dealing with a psychopath is all about control. Beware of “gaslighting”—psychopaths like playing the victim when, in fact, they victimize you! Resources Mentioned: Investigation Discovery Channel & Dateline Show– TV shows where stories and documentaries are about crimes that lead to psychopaths Gaslighting – the tactic psychopaths use to alter your reality Visit: psychopathinyourlife.com Dianne’s book Psychopaths In Our Lives: My Interviews By Dianne Emerson Is available on Amazon http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517307880 Credits – Podcast Production and Editing Service by Red Walk Boy Production https://www.facebook.com/redwalkboypr... http://podcasteditor.weebly.com/ – Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives www.mallardcreatives.com/testimonials

9 Maj 201713min

004 - Characteristics of a Psychopath

004 - Characteristics of a Psychopath

Psychopath in Your Life -Podcast Show Notes- In Episode 004, Dianne continues to share from her personal interviews with psychopaths the attributes they look for in their future victims. Dianne also explains how the definition of how a psychopath is diagnosed. Tune in to find out why psychopaths are who they are. You can contact Dianne on her website or by email   Resources Mentioned:  Psychopaths In Our Lives: My Interviews http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517307880 Also available on iBook’s   Credits Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives

9 Maj 201715min

001 – Psychopaths: Let’s Chat

001 – Psychopaths: Let’s Chat

In the first episode, Dianne Emerson introduces the podcast, Psychopath in Your Life. The aim of this podcast is to help people understand who psychopaths are and how to identify them amongst the crowd of people that you rub shoulders with on a daily basis. Tune is as Dianne gives listeners insight into how her journey into this research began, why general information and checklists regarding psychopaths can be confusing and misleading, and what it means to be a “successful” psychopath. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – This podcast is exclusively dedicated to talk about psychopaths 00:42 – In the 1980’s, Ann Rule was one of the more famous crime writers 00:49 – Her first book was about Ted Bundy, The Stranger Beside Me 01:07 – Jack Olsen also came out with a book called Son 01:19 – The character in this book came from a prominent family 01:52 – This podcast will be about identifying psychopaths 02:04 – Not all the information about psychopaths—the checklists— translate into behavior 02:28 – More information has become available because of the internet 02:40 – To store the information, Dianne set up a free forum 02:52 – She started sorting information and people started sharing their stories 03:16 – Along the way, the discussion forum grew and grew 03:50 – Dianne became fascinated by how many people got involved with a psychopath 04:20 – Who are the psychopaths? They are people who are likely to commit crimes (general prison population) 04:28 – 25% of the prison population are tested and classified as psychopaths 04:35 – 1-3% of the general population are classified as psychopaths 05:04 – How do you know if a person is a psychopath? 05:08 – They fall under the personality disorder cluster 05:14 – “It’s in the genes” 06:03 – Checklists are a good source of information, but they can also cause confusion 06:12 – Smart psychopaths vs. those who end up in prison 06:49 – Psychopaths with criminal minds are easier to identify 06:58 – “The more educated they are, the more they are able to cover their behavior” 07:06 – “The one thing that they don’t have that we have is a conscience” 07:52 – Without a conscience, psychopaths are able to make decisions normal people cannot 08:06 – A practiced psychopath can trick people into believing that they have conscience 09:19 – A psychopath can be a person who’s successful 09:37 – A “successful psychopath” studies and learns different behaviors 10:12 – Normal people tend to overlook things 10:45 – A few years ago, Dianne was contacted by psychopaths who wanted to tell their stories 11:03 – She started a book about the plight of victims of psychopaths 11:13 – Dianne thought there had to be some more information to share to the public regarding how psychopaths operate 11:51 – She decided to interview psychopaths under controlled circumstances 12:46 – One question she asked was, “what was their motivation?” 12:51 – All 3 of them said they wanted to learn 13:00 – They wanted to learn how they can hide their behavior better 13:24 – Dianne’s book is called Psychopaths in Our Lives: My Interviews 14:09 – Stranger danger is overrated 14:31 – Next episode will be about the personalities of psychopaths, clues to look for, and how you can know if you’re a person they’re looking to victimize 14:44 – Dianne looks forward to your questions and comments to continue the conversation! 15:07 – Dianne has spoken with a lot of victims and understands your need for privacy and confidentiality and will deal with your comments/emails with the utmost respect 15:34 – Check out Psychopath In Your Life and send your questions and comments (anonymous, if you’d prefer) that Dianne will be more than willing to address on the air 15:57 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: One size does NOT fit all—the checklists of information regarding psychopaths does not always translate into behavior. Practiced and successful psychopaths trick people into believing they are “normal.” It is the psychopaths in our lives who are the ones that can hurt us the most. Resources Mentioned: Ann Rule – a crime writer in the 1980’s The Stranger Beside Me – Ann Rule’s book with Ted Bundy Son – Jack Olsen’s book on an affluent psychopath Psychopaths in Our Lives: My Interviews – Dianne Emerson’s book

2 Maj 201715min

002 - Psychopaths: Who ARE They

002 - Psychopaths: Who ARE They

In Episode 002, Dianne delves into the very terms used to define a psychopath and some of the attributes they may exhibit. She shares a story of a psychopath’s co-mingled diagnosis and discusses how a psychopath used the guise of kindness in The Fake Rockefeller. Who do psychopaths choose as victims? Why do some psychopaths pretend to be kind and caring? Tune in as Dianne discusses the complicated nature of defining a psychopath, why they try to blend into the crowd, and how being kind and caring can make you a token victim. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – This podcast is dedicated to be exclusively a discussion about psychopaths 00:31 – Psychopaths, sociopaths, and antisocial personality disorders – what’s the best way to identify them? 00:56 – Dianne will define all these terms on her website and how these terms have evolved over the years 01:33 – Even Psychopaths, themselves, disagree with the terms they’ve been called 02:44 – Dianne shares an example of a “co-mingled diagnosis” 04:07 – Psychopaths look like, walk like, and talk like normal people 04:30 – There are many psychopaths who are aware of their condition 05:07 – There are socialized and non-socialized psychopaths 05:47 – Less socialized ones end up in the prison system 06:13 – Dianne started this podcast to provide information 06:27 – One interviewee said something Dianne will never forgot 06:55 – “The world is becoming more like us than you” 07:13 – Certain industries attract more psychopaths than others 07:30 – Victims are kind and caring people 08:01 – The end game for a psychopath is to gain control; so if you’re kind, you tend to be an easier victim 08:20 – “Living life by painting the red flags white”—kind people tend to ignore the red flags 08:38 – Dianne has heard from victims all these years, but she never had an idea about how much detail goes into the planning 09:09 – Psychopaths may have animal abuse in their background, but can also use this stereotype to their advantage by befriending and taking care of an animal 09:52 – At the end of the day, “Psychopaths don’t love anybody, but themselves” 10:04 – See the story of The Fake Rockefeller 10:40 – Part of how the psychopath blended in was by pretending to be a kind person who wanted to adopt a handicapped dog 11:39 – Psychopaths know the triggers and attributes that kind and caring people exhibit as it becomes a part of their persona 12:14 – We RESPECT your privacy – send an email to dianne@dianneemerson.com for comments and questions 12:34 – Check out Psychopath In Your Life and send an anonymous email 13:23 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: Psychopaths behave very normally—you have to keep a close eye to actually identify them properly. The world is becoming filled with more psychopaths than normal people. Victims tend to be those who are kind and caring as they are the ones that are the most likely to give up control to a psychopath. Resources Mentioned: The Fake Rockefeller – A true crime story about a guy who faked his identity to blend with people

2 Maj 201713min

Populärt inom Utbildning

bygga-at-idioter
historiepodden-se
det-skaver
rss-bara-en-till-om-missbruk-medberoende-2
nu-blir-det-historia
harrisons-dramatiska-historia
svd-ledarredaktionen
alska-oss
johannes-hansen-podcast
allt-du-velat-veta
not-fanny-anymore
roda-vita-rosen
rikatillsammans-om-privatekonomi-rikedom-i-livet
sa-in-i-sjalen
rosceremoni
rss-max-tant-med-max-villman
sektledare
rss-sjalsligt-avkladd
i-vantan-pa-katastrofen
rss-npf-podden