The President Of The United States And The Jeffrey Epstein Shrug Heard Around The World (7/9/25)

Les Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and Victoria’s Secret, has alleged that Jeffrey Epstein stole millions of dollars from him while serving as his personal money manager. Wexner gave Epstein sweeping power of attorney in the early 1990s, allowing him control over financial and real estate transactions. When Wexner severed ties with him in 2007, he said he discovered that Epstein had misappropriated a significant amount of money, with at least $46 million identified as funds taken without authorization. Wexner claimed that some of this money was supposed to support his charitable foundation but was instead diverted by Epstein.Despite the large sum, Wexner has never disclosed the full extent of what was allegedly stolen, nor has he clarified why Epstein was granted such unchecked financial authority. Reports suggest that Epstein’s control over Wexner’s finances allowed him to access charitable funds and move money with little oversight. Wexner has publicly insisted that he was one of Epstein’s victims, but critics have pointed out that he has never fully explained how such theft went unnoticed for years or whether authorities were ever asked to investigate the alleged financial misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://abcnews.go.com/US/billionaire-businessman-leslie-wexner-refuses-reveal-full-scope/story?id=68461262Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

26 Sep 16min

Denise George, the former Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, took a highly aggressive approach in pursuing Jeffrey Epstein’s financial network, using subpoenas as her primary weapon. Her office demanded records from major banks—including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank—seeking detailed information on Epstein’s accounts, shell companies, and offshore structures. She also extended subpoenas to powerful financiers like Leon Black and his firm Apollo Global Management, as well as Glenn Dubin and his wife, requiring them to produce financial statements and communications tied to their dealings with Epstein. These subpoenas aimed to uncover the hidden channels through which Epstein moved money, secured influence, and allegedly funded his trafficking operation.The broader intent behind George’s subpoenas was not just to secure financial restitution from Epstein’s estate, but to expose the web of enablers who may have knowingly or unknowingly facilitated his crimes. Her legal filings accused Epstein and his entities of running a criminal enterprise involving sex trafficking, forced labor, and aggravated sexual assault in the Virgin Islands. By targeting banks and billionaires alike, George’s subpoenas sent a clear message: Epstein’s power was built on institutional complicity, and the only way to dismantle it was to follow the money wherever it led.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 15min

Jeffrey Epstein had several documented parole violations after he "served" his original sentence, yet nothing was ever done about it. Even when he was caught by a police officer in a place where he wasn't supposed to be, his parole officer, Carmen Sloan covered for him, even after her supervisor said that he was in violation. Let's dive in and take a look. (commercial at 10:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/story/news/2012/04/01/jeffrey-epstein-house-arrest-missteps/9629975007/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 18min

Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 11min

The Epstein cover-up isn’t just corruption—it’s an insult to everyone’s intelligence. The powerful trot out the same tired lines—“we’re investigating,” “we didn’t know,” “our hands are tied”—while survivors are still screaming and files remain sealed. Politicians pound tables for the cameras, the FBI pretends to be helpless, and institutions hide behind PR spin, charity donations, and crocodile tears. The arrogance is breathtaking: they think if they stall long enough, the public will forget. But the public isn’t forgetting, because everyone knows this wasn’t ignorance—it was complicity.At its core, this isn’t just about Epstein—it’s about a system rotted through with people who knew, who benefited, and who chose to protect themselves instead of the victims. Every sealed file, every redacted name, every “move on” excuse is proof that power protects power at all costs. The outrage won’t fade, because truth doesn’t expire. The longer they bury it, the hotter the rage burns. And when the dam breaks, every enabler—from politicians to royals to institutions that took the money—will drown in the flood of accountability they thought they could dodge.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 11min

The Thomas Massie/Ro Khana discharge petition to bring Jeffrey Epstein’s sealed files to the House floor has surged forward, closing in on the 218 votes required. With all 212 Democrats unified in support, the math is simple: just a handful of Republicans breaking ranks will guarantee the petition’s success. The momentum has been further fueled by the Arizona special election, where the victor pledged to add their name as soon as they’re sworn in, potentially becoming the tipping point.Republican leadership, however, is digging in its heels. Reports have surfaced of threats and pressure campaigns aimed at peeling away GOP support, a reflection of the desperation to keep the vote from hitting the magic number. But if Massie secures the final signatures, leadership will lose control, and the House will be compelled to go on record in full public view. At that moment, lawmakers will have to choose between protecting secrets or siding with transparency—an unavoidable reckoning that could fracture party lines and ignite a political firestorm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House nears vote to compel release of Jeffrey Epstein filesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 16min

This morning’s Epstein-related headlines captured a mix of political, legal, and royal fallout. In Washington, a provocative bronze statue of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was installed overnight on the National Mall and swiftly removed by U.S. Park Police for lacking proper authorization. The work, titled “Best Friends Forever,” was claimed by an anonymous art collective as political satire, provoking crowds and online debate before authorities dismantled it. The episode highlighted ongoing tensions around Trump’s past ties to Epstein and the broader fight over transparency in the case.At the same time, James O’Keefe released hidden-camera footage of former DOJ official Glenn Prager alleging that Trump is blocking the release of Epstein-related files, even claiming Epstein had been a CIA asset—remarks that DOJ dismissed as misleading. Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie launched an anti-trafficking campaign in New York to address exploitation in counterfeit fashion supply chains. Her initiative, though welcomed by some human rights groups, was quickly overshadowed by renewed scrutiny of her parents’ ties to Epstein, underscoring how the scandal continues to reverberate across politics and royalty alike.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 11min

James O’Keefe (via his O’Keefe Media / Project Veritas apparatus) recently released a covert recording of Glenn Prager, a former DOJ official, during a flight from Phoenix to Washington. In the video, Prager asserts that Epstein was a CIA asset, alleges that President Trump is not personally implicated in Epstein-related sexual crimes, and claims Trump’s reluctance to release files stems from a desire to “protect a lot of people.” He further argues that his interviews with Epstein victims and review of itineraries found no evidence of Trump being present during assaults, while drawing a sharp contrast to Bill Clinton, whom he said was present during alleged rapes.The Department of Justice swiftly pushed back, stating that Prager’s role was limited to a program analyst position more than fifteen years ago and that he lacks direct knowledge of the Epstein investigations. The DOJ called his statements unreliable and criticized the release as exploitative of sexual abuse victims. Meanwhile, the recording has ignited renewed calls among critics and some Republicans for more transparency in the Epstein case and fresh scrutiny of withheld DOJ files.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein Investigator Taped Admitting Donald Trump ‘Covered Up’ FilesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 16min